• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量和反馈对重症监护病房患者使用葡萄糖酸洗必泰沐浴的影响:一项多中心研究。

Impact of measurement and feedback on chlorhexidine gluconate bathing among intensive care unit patients: A multicenter study.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Community, Systems, and Mental Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;44(9):1375-1380. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.177. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1017/ice.2023.177
PMID:37700540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10859163/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether measurement and feedback of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) skin concentrations can improve CHG bathing practice across multiple intensive care units (ICUs).

DESIGN

A before-and-after quality improvement study measuring patient CHG skin concentrations during 6 point-prevalence surveys (3 surveys each during baseline and intervention periods).

SETTING

The study was conducted across 7 geographically diverse ICUs with routine CHG bathing.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients in the medical ICU.

METHODS

CHG skin concentrations were measured at the neck, axilla, and inguinal region using a semiquantitative colorimetric assay. Aggregate unit-level CHG skin concentration measurements from the baseline period and each intervention period survey were reported back to ICU leadership, which then used routine education and quality improvement activities to improve CHG bathing practice. We used multilevel linear models to assess the impact of intervention on CHG skin concentrations.

RESULTS

We enrolled 681 (93%) of 736 eligible patients; 92% received a CHG bath prior to survey. At baseline, CHG skin concentrations were lowest on the neck, compared to axillary or inguinal regions ( < .001). CHG was not detected on 33% of necks, 19% of axillae, and 18% of inguinal regions ( < .001 for differences in body sites). During the intervention period, ICUs that used CHG-impregnated cloths had a 3-fold increase in patient CHG skin concentrations as compared to baseline ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine CHG bathing performance in the ICU varied across multiple hospitals. Measurement and feedback of CHG skin concentrations can be an important tool to improve CHG bathing practice.

摘要

目的

评估测量和反馈葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)皮肤浓度是否可以改善多个重症监护病房(ICU)的 CHG 沐浴实践。

设计

在 6 次点患病率调查(基线和干预期间各进行 3 次调查)期间测量患者 CHG 皮肤浓度的前后质量改进研究。

设置

该研究在 7 个地理位置不同的 ICU 进行,这些 ICU 常规进行 CHG 沐浴。

参与者

内科 ICU 的成年患者。

方法

使用半定量比色法测量颈部、腋窝和腹股沟区域的 CHG 皮肤浓度。从基线期和每个干预期调查的汇总单位水平 CHG 皮肤浓度测量值报告给 ICU 领导层,然后 ICU 领导层利用常规教育和质量改进活动来改善 CHG 沐浴实践。我们使用多水平线性模型评估干预对 CHG 皮肤浓度的影响。

结果

我们招募了 736 名符合条件的患者中的 681 名(93%);92%的患者在调查前接受了 CHG 沐浴。在基线时,与腋窝或腹股沟区域相比,颈部的 CHG 皮肤浓度最低(<0.001)。颈部 33%、腋窝 19%和腹股沟 18%的 CHG 未检出(身体部位之间的差异<0.001)。在干预期间,与基线相比,使用 CHG 浸渍布的 ICU 患者的 CHG 皮肤浓度增加了 3 倍(<0.001)。

结论

多个医院的 ICU 常规 CHG 沐浴表现存在差异。测量和反馈 CHG 皮肤浓度可以是改善 CHG 沐浴实践的重要工具。

相似文献

1
Impact of measurement and feedback on chlorhexidine gluconate bathing among intensive care unit patients: A multicenter study.测量和反馈对重症监护病房患者使用葡萄糖酸洗必泰沐浴的影响:一项多中心研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;44(9):1375-1380. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.177. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
2
Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing practices and skin concentrations in intensive care unit patients.葡萄糖酸氯己定沐浴实践和重症监护病房患者的皮肤浓度。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Feb;46(2):226-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
3
Implementing daily chlorhexidine gluconate treatment for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections in non-intensive care settings: A multiple case analysis.在非重症监护环境中实施日常葡萄糖酸氯己定处理以预防医源性感染:多案例分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0232062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232062. eCollection 2020.
4
A Multicenter Pragmatic Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing in Community Hospital Intensive Care Units.社区医院重症监护病房葡萄糖酸氯己定沐浴的多中心实用中断时间序列分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;37(7):791-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.23. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
5
Differential Effects of Chlorhexidine Skin Cleansing Methods on Residual Chlorhexidine Skin Concentrations and Bacterial Recovery.不同洗必泰皮肤清洁方法对残余洗必泰皮肤浓度和细菌回收的影响差异。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):405-411. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.312. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Relationship between chlorhexidine gluconate concentration and microbial colonization of patients' skin.葡萄糖酸氯己定浓度与患者皮肤微生物定植之间的关系。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 May 28:1-6. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.81.
7
Daily skin cleansing with chlorhexidine did not reduce the rate of central-line associated bloodstream infection in a surgical intensive care unit.在外科重症监护病房,每天用洗必泰进行皮肤清洁并未降低中心静脉导管相关血流感染的发生率。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 May;36(5):854-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1783-y. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
8
Relationship between chlorhexidine gluconate skin concentration and microbial density on the skin of critically ill patients bathed daily with chlorhexidine gluconate.洗必泰葡萄糖酸皮肤浓度与重症患者每日用洗必泰葡萄糖酸沐浴后皮肤微生物密度的关系。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;33(9):889-96. doi: 10.1086/667371. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
9
A Quality Improvement Project to Decrease CLABSIs in Non-ICU Settings.非 ICU 环境下降低 CLABSI 的质量改进项目。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2023;32(3):189-196. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000375. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
10
Implementing daily chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing in VA settings: The human factors engineering to prevent resistant organisms (HERO) project.在退伍军人事务部环境中实施日常葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)沐浴:预防耐药菌的人为因素工程(HERO)项目。
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Jun;49(6):775-783. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Can chlorhexidine gluconate baths reduce fungal colonisation in intensive care unit patients?葡萄糖酸氯己定浴能减少重症监护病房患者的真菌定植吗?
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2025 Jul 9;14(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13756-025-01606-6.
2
Relationship between chlorhexidine gluconate concentration and microbial colonization of patients' skin.葡萄糖酸氯己定浓度与患者皮肤微生物定植之间的关系。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 May 28:1-6. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.81.
3
Rapid Environmental Contamination With Candida auris and Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pathogens Near Colonized Patients.耳念珠菌和多重耐药菌病原体在定植患者附近的快速环境污染。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 May 15;78(5):1276-1284. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad752.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.急性护理医院预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染的策略:2022年更新
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 May;43(5):553-569. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.87. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Integrated genomic, epidemiologic investigation of Candida auris skin colonization in a skilled nursing facility.在一家熟练护理机构中对耳念珠菌皮肤定植进行的整合基因组、流行病学调查。
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1401-1409. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01383-w. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
3
Association between chlorhexidine gluconate concentrations and resistant bacterial bioburden on skin.葡萄糖酸氯己定浓度与皮肤耐药菌生物负荷的关系。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;40(12):1430-1432. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.265. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
4
You get back what you give: Decreased hospital infections with improvement in CHG bathing, a mathematical modeling and cost analysis.付出就有回报:通过改进 CHG 沐浴,用数学模型和成本分析降低医院感染率。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Dec;47(12):1471-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
5
Differential Effects of Chlorhexidine Skin Cleansing Methods on Residual Chlorhexidine Skin Concentrations and Bacterial Recovery.不同洗必泰皮肤清洁方法对残余洗必泰皮肤浓度和细菌回收的影响差异。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):405-411. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.312. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
Chlorhexidine gluconate bathing practices and skin concentrations in intensive care unit patients.葡萄糖酸氯己定沐浴实践和重症监护病房患者的皮肤浓度。
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Feb;46(2):226-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.08.022. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
7
Acquired resistance to chlorhexidine - is it time to establish an 'antiseptic stewardship' initiative?对洗必泰获得性耐药——是时候开展“抗菌药物管理”倡议了吗?
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Nov;94(3):213-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
8
Chlorhexidine and Mupirocin Susceptibility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in the REDUCE-MRSA Trial.REDUCE-MRSA试验中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌分离株对氯己定和莫匹罗星的敏感性
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Nov;54(11):2735-2742. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01444-16. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
9
Evidence for a Standardized Preadmission Showering Regimen to Achieve Maximal Antiseptic Skin Surface Concentrations of Chlorhexidine Gluconate, 4%, in Surgical Patients.术前沐浴标准化方案以实现手术患者葡萄糖酸洗必泰 4%的最大皮肤表面抗菌浓度的证据。
JAMA Surg. 2015 Nov;150(11):1027-33. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.2210.
10
Chlorhexidine Only Works If Applied Correctly: Use of a Simple Colorimetric Assay to Provide Monitoring and Feedback on Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Application.洗必泰只有正确使用才有效:使用简单的比色测定法来监测洗必泰应用效果并提供反馈。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Sep;36(9):1095-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.124. Epub 2015 Jun 15.