Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Optentia, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2024 Apr;36(4):289-305. doi: 10.1017/S1041610223000704. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
Not only care professionals are responsible for the quality of care but other stakeholders including regulators also play a role. Over the last decades, countries have increasingly invested in regulation of Long-Term Care (LTC) for older persons, raising the question of how regulation should be put into practice to guarantee or improve the quality of care. This scoping review aims to summarize the evidence on regulatory practices in LTC for older persons. It identifies empirical studies, documents the aims and findings, and describes research gaps to foster this field.
A literature search (in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, APA PsycInfo and Scopus) was performed from inception up to December 12, 2022. Thirty-one studies were included.
All included studies were from high-income countries, in particular Australia, the US and Northwestern Europe, and almost all focused on care provided in LTC facilities. The studies focused on different aspects of regulatory practice, including care users' experiences in collecting intelligence, impact of standards, regulatory systems and strategies, inspection activities and policies, perception and style of inspectors, perception and attitudes of inspectees and validity and reliability of inspection outcomes.
With increasingly fragmented and networked care providers, and an increasing call for person-centred care, more flexible forms of regulatory practice in LTC are needed, organized closer to daily practice, bottom-up. We hope that this scoping review will raise awareness of the importance of regulatory practice and foster research in this field, to improve the quality of LTC for older persons, and optimize their functional ability and well-being.
不仅护理专业人员对护理质量负责,其他利益相关者,包括监管机构,也发挥着作用。在过去几十年中,各国越来越多地投资于老年人长期护理(LTC)的监管,这引发了一个问题,即应如何实施监管以保证或提高护理质量。本范围综述旨在总结老年人长期护理监管实践的证据。它确定了实证研究,记录了目标和发现,并描述了研究空白,以促进这一领域的发展。
从开始到 2022 年 12 月 12 日,在 PubMed、Embase、Cinahl、APA PsycInfo 和 Scopus 上进行了文献检索。
所有纳入的研究均来自高收入国家,特别是澳大利亚、美国和西北欧,几乎所有研究都集中在长期护理机构提供的护理上。这些研究侧重于监管实践的不同方面,包括护理使用者在收集情报、标准的影响、监管系统和策略、检查活动和政策、检查员的感知和风格、检查对象的感知和态度以及检查结果的有效性和可靠性方面的经验。
随着护理提供者日益分散和网络化,以及对以患者为中心的护理的需求不断增加,长期护理中需要更加灵活的监管实践形式,更接近日常实践,自下而上组织。我们希望本范围综述将提高对监管实践重要性的认识,并促进该领域的研究,以提高老年人长期护理的质量,优化他们的功能能力和幸福感。