Suppr超能文献

利用某医院健康检查数据比较韩国职业安全与健康局和国民健康保险服务局的心血管疾病风险评估工具。

Comparing Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency and National Health Insurance Service's cardio-cerebrovascular diseases risk-assessment tools using data from one hospital's health checkups.

作者信息

Cho Yunrae, Kim Dong Geon, Park Byung-Chan, Yang Seonhee, Kim Sang Kyu

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Gyeongju, Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Gyeongju, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Occup Environ Med. 2023 Aug 21;35:e35. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2023.35.e35. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardio-cerebrovascular diseases (CVDs) are the most common cause of death worldwide. Various CVD risk assessment tools have been developed. In South Korea, the Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency (KOSHA) and the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) have provided CVD risk assessments with health checkups. Since 2018, the KOSHA guide has stated that NHIS CVD risk assessment tool could be used as an alternative of KOSHA assessment tool for evaluating CVD risk of workers. The objective of this study was to determine the correlation and agreement between the KOSHA and the NHIS CVD risk assessment tools.

METHODS

Subjects of this study were 17,485 examinees aged 20 to 64 years who had undergone medical examinations from January 2021 to December 2021 at a general hospital. We classified subjects into low-risk, moderate-risk, high-risk, and highest-risk groups according to KOSHA and NHIS's CVD risk assessment tools. We then compared them with cross-analysis, Spearman correlation analysis, and linearly weighted kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

The correlation between KOSHA and NHIS tools was statistically significant (-value < 0.001), with a correlation coefficient of 0.403 and a kappa coefficient of 0.203. When we compared risk group distribution using KOSHA and NHIS tools, CVD risk of 6,498 (37.1%) participants showed a concordance. Compared to the NHIS tool, the KOSHA tool classified 9,908 (56.7%) participants into a lower risk category and 1,079 (6.2%) participants into a higher risk category.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, KOSHA and NHIS tools showed a moderate correlation with a fair agreement. The NHIS tool showed a tendency to classify participants to higher CVD risk group than the KOSHA tool. To prevent CVD more effectively, a higher estimation tool among verified CVD risk assessment methods should be selected and managements such as early intervention and treatment of risk factors should be performed targeting the high-risk group.

摘要

背景

心脑血管疾病(CVDs)是全球最常见的死亡原因。已经开发了各种CVD风险评估工具。在韩国,韩国职业安全与健康局(KOSHA)和国民健康保险服务(NHIS)已在健康检查中提供CVD风险评估。自2018年以来,KOSHA指南指出,NHIS CVD风险评估工具可作为KOSHA评估工具的替代方案,用于评估工人的CVD风险。本研究的目的是确定KOSHA和NHIS CVD风险评估工具之间的相关性和一致性。

方法

本研究的受试者为2021年1月至2021年12月在一家综合医院接受体检的17485名20至64岁的受检者。我们根据KOSHA和NHIS的CVD风险评估工具将受试者分为低风险、中度风险、高风险和最高风险组。然后,我们通过交叉分析、Spearman相关性分析和线性加权kappa系数对它们进行比较。

结果

KOSHA和NHIS工具之间的相关性具有统计学意义(P值<0.001),相关系数为0.403,kappa系数为0.203。当我们使用KOSHA和NHIS工具比较风险组分布时,6498名(37.1%)参与者的CVD风险显示出一致性。与NHIS工具相比,KOSHA工具将9908名(56.7%)参与者分类为较低风险类别,将1079名(6.2%)参与者分类为较高风险类别。

结论

在本研究中,KOSHA和NHIS工具显示出中等相关性和合理的一致性。NHIS工具显示出比KOSHA工具将参与者分类到更高CVD风险组的趋势。为了更有效地预防CVD,应在经过验证的CVD风险评估方法中选择更高估计的工具,并针对高风险组进行早期干预和危险因素治疗等管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验