Ferre J M, Wilber L A
Ear Hear. 1986 Oct;7(5):336-43. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198610000-00009.
The performance of normal children (N = 13) and learning disabled children (N = 26) on an experimental battery of central auditory processing (CAP) tasks was examined. The battery included low-pass filtered speech (LPFS), binaural fusion (BF), time-compressed speech (TC), and dichotic monosyllables (DM) tests. The learning disabled subjects were classified as having normal (LD/N) or significantly impaired (LD/LD) auditory perceptual skills on the basis of a pretest battery of auditory language tests. The normal (N/N) subjects and nonauditory learning disabled (LD/N) subjects tended to perform alike across measures. The auditorily impaired (LD/LD) subjects tended to perform significantly poorer than their normal agemates. The results emphasized the heterogeneity of the learning disabled population. In addition, the results suggested a potentially useful "at risk" criterion when a CAP test battery is used in the assessment of auditory perceptual impairment among children.
对13名正常儿童和26名学习障碍儿童在一组中枢听觉处理(CAP)实验任务中的表现进行了检查。该组任务包括低通滤波言语(LPFS)、双耳融合(BF)、时间压缩言语(TC)和双耳单音节(DM)测试。根据一组听觉语言测试的预测试,将学习障碍受试者分为听觉感知技能正常(LD/N)或明显受损(LD/LD)两类。正常(N/N)受试者和非听觉学习障碍(LD/N)受试者在各项测量中的表现往往相似。听觉受损(LD/LD)受试者的表现往往明显比同龄正常儿童差。结果强调了学习障碍人群的异质性。此外,结果表明,当使用CAP测试组评估儿童的听觉感知障碍时,可能存在一个有用的“风险”标准。