Ballarín Castany Angels, Serrà Rigol Thaïs, Cereceda Ferrés M, Serrarols Soldevila M, Oller Piqué Ramon, Gómez-Batiste Xavier
Equip d'Atenció Primària, Vic, España.
Institut Català de la Salut, Santa Eugènia de Berga, España.
Aten Primaria. 2023 Dec;55(12):102741. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102741. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
Determine pain prevalence and clinical characteristics in patients with advanced chronic disease and identify breakthrough pain frequency.
Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study.
Three primary care teams and one intermediate care hospital.
All patients with advanced chronic disease.
A semi-structured interview was performed to collect demographic, clinical, and specific variables of pain using validated scales. Patient location (home, nursing home or hospital) and advanced chronicity trajectory (organ failure, oncological disease, dementia, or multimorbidity) were recorded. Pain was assessed based on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and, in cases of disabling dementia, using the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD). A statistical descriptive, comparative analysis between variables was performed using the R software.
Of all patients selected, 223 (60.4%) were included. Prevalence of pain: 83.9% (n=187), with no differences based on location or trajectory. Significant differences in pain intensity based on location (P=.0046) (moderate-severe in patients at home, moderate in hospital patients, and mild in nursing home patients) and on trajectory (P<.0001) (moderate-severe in patients with organ failure and multimorbidity, moderate in patients with cancer, and mild in patients with dementia). Global functional impact of pain was mild-moderate, emotional impact was severe in 41.5% of patients (n=51), and breakthrough pain was observed in 8.6% (n=13).
Pain must always be explored and assessed in patients with advanced chronicity, since it was highly prevalent in all locations and trajectories, being particularly intense in patients at home with organ failure and multimorbidity. Breakthrough pain was found in non-oncological trajectories.
确定晚期慢性病患者的疼痛患病率和临床特征,并识别爆发性疼痛的频率。
观察性、描述性横断面研究。
三个初级保健团队和一家中级护理医院。
所有晚期慢性病患者。
采用经过验证的量表进行半结构化访谈,以收集人口统计学、临床和疼痛的特定变量。记录患者所在位置(家中、养老院或医院)以及晚期慢性病轨迹(器官衰竭、肿瘤疾病、痴呆或多种疾病并存)。根据简明疼痛问卷(BPI)评估疼痛,对于失能性痴呆患者,则使用晚期痴呆疼痛评估量表(PAINAD)进行评估。使用R软件对变量进行统计描述性和比较分析。
在所有选定患者中,223例(60.4%)被纳入研究。疼痛患病率为83.9%(n = 187),在位置或轨迹方面无差异。基于位置的疼痛强度存在显著差异(P = 0.0046)(家中患者为中度至重度,医院患者为中度,养老院患者为轻度),基于轨迹的疼痛强度也存在显著差异(P < 0.0001)(器官衰竭和多种疾病并存患者为中度至重度,癌症患者为中度,痴呆患者为轻度)。疼痛对整体功能的影响为轻度至中度,41.5%的患者(n = 51)有严重的情绪影响,8.6%(n = 13)的患者观察到爆发性疼痛。
对于晚期慢性病患者,必须始终进行疼痛的探索和评估,因为疼痛在所有位置和轨迹中都非常普遍,在家中患有器官衰竭和多种疾病并存的患者中尤为强烈。在非肿瘤轨迹中发现了爆发性疼痛。