Suppr超能文献

养老院中晚期痴呆症患者的疼痛评估:一项系统综述。

Pain Assessment for Individuals with Advanced Dementia in Care Homes: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Felton Nansi, Lewis Jennifer S, Cockburn Sarah-Jane, Hodgson Margot, Dawson Shoba

机构信息

Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath NHS House, Newbridge Hill, Bath BA1 3QE, UK.

School for Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1DD, UK.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;6(4):101. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6040101.

Abstract

Pain is prevalent in older people, especially in those with advanced dementia who have communication impairments. Although pain is recognised to be present in this population, it is often under-assessed and ineffectively managed. The assessment of pain in advanced dementia is extremely challenging and complex, particularly in institutional settings such as care homes. This study systematically reviews the literature to examine and characterise the evidence for the use of pain assessment tools in care homes with individuals living with advanced dementia. Relevant publications were sourced from electronic bibliometric medical databases including AMED, CINAHL Plus, Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE, TRIP Pro, Google Scholar, and HINARI. The database search was supplemented by screening citations and reference lists, in addition to a grey literature searches. The search identified 2221 studies, among which 26 were included in the review. The majority of the studies were observational, which created a rich source of data to create four major themes. The findings were informed and shaped by working with key stakeholders to develop a conceptual model that can contribute to developing evidence-based practice. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive, multi-disciplinary approach to pain assessment in this population, which is beyond the use of tools.

摘要

疼痛在老年人中普遍存在,尤其是在患有晚期痴呆症且有沟通障碍的人群中。尽管人们认识到这一人群存在疼痛,但疼痛往往评估不足且管理不力。对晚期痴呆症患者的疼痛评估极具挑战性且复杂,尤其是在养老院等机构环境中。本研究系统回顾了文献,以检查和描述在养老院中对患有晚期痴呆症的个体使用疼痛评估工具的证据。相关出版物来自电子文献计量医学数据库,包括AMED、CINAHL Plus、Medline、PsycINFO、EMBASE、TRIP Pro、谷歌学术和HINARI。除了灰色文献搜索外,还通过筛选引用文献和参考文献列表对数据库搜索进行了补充。搜索共识别出2221项研究,其中26项被纳入综述。大多数研究为观察性研究,这为形成四个主要主题提供了丰富的数据来源。通过与关键利益相关者合作开发一个有助于发展循证实践的概念模型,研究结果得到了进一步的完善和深化。这凸显了采用全面、多学科方法对这一人群进行疼痛评估的重要性,而这不仅仅是使用评估工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10a0/8544573/94eba5e286f2/geriatrics-06-00101-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验