• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌根治术后吻合口狭窄的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Risk factors for anastomotic stenosis after radical resection of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.209. Epub 2023 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.209
PMID:37704476
Abstract

Radical resection of rectal cancer is a safe and effective treatment, but there remain several complications related to anastomosis. We aimed to assess the risk factors and incidence of rectal anastomotic stenosis (AS) after rectal cancer resection. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis after searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline databases from inception until May 2023. Data are reported as the combined odds ratio (OR) for categorical variables and the weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables. Six hundred and fifty-nine studies were retrieved, nine (3031 patients) of which were included in the meta-analysis. Young age (WMD = -3.09, P = 0.0002), male sex (OR = 1.53, P = 0.0002), smoking (OR = 1.54, P = 0.009), radiotherapy (OR = 2.34, P = 0.0002), protective stoma (OR = 2.88, P = 0.007), intersphincteric resection surgery (OR = 6.28, P = 0.05), anastomotic fistula (OR = 3.72, P = 0.003), and anastomotic distance (WMD = -3.11, P = 0.0006) were identified as factors that increased the risk of AS, while staple (OR = 0.39, P < 0.001) was a protective factor. The incidence of AS after rectal cancer resection was approximately 17% (95% CI: 13%-21%). We identified eight risk factors and one protective factor associated with AS after rectal cancer resection. These factors may be combined in future studies to develop a more comprehensive and accurate prediction model related to AS after rectal cancer resection.

摘要

直肠癌根治术是一种安全有效的治疗方法,但仍存在与吻合口相关的几种并发症。我们旨在评估直肠癌切除术后直肠吻合口狭窄(AS)的危险因素和发生率。我们在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Medline 数据库中进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,检索时间从建库至 2023 年 5 月。数据以分类变量的合并比值比(OR)和连续变量的加权均数差(WMD)报告。共检索到 659 项研究,其中 9 项(3031 例患者)纳入荟萃分析。年轻(WMD=-3.09,P=0.0002)、男性(OR=1.53,P=0.0002)、吸烟(OR=1.54,P=0.009)、放疗(OR=2.34,P=0.0002)、保护性造口(OR=2.88,P=0.007)、经括约肌间切除术(OR=6.28,P=0.05)、吻合口瘘(OR=3.72,P=0.003)和吻合口距离(WMD=-3.11,P=0.0006)是增加 AS 风险的因素,而吻合器(OR=0.39,P<0.001)是保护因素。直肠癌切除术后 AS 的发生率约为 17%(95%CI:13%-21%)。我们确定了 8 个与直肠癌切除术后 AS 相关的危险因素和 1 个保护因素。这些因素可能在未来的研究中结合起来,以开发更全面和准确的与直肠癌切除术后 AS 相关的预测模型。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for anastomotic stenosis after radical resection of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌根治术后吻合口狭窄的危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Jan;47(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.08.209. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
2
Ghost Ileostomy Versus Loop Ileostomy Following Oncologic Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.直肠癌术后行造口还纳术时,预防性回肠袢式造口与单纯末端回肠造口的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Innov. 2023 Aug;30(4):501-516. doi: 10.1177/15533506231169066. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
3
Does rectal tube/transanal stent placement after an anterior resection for rectal cancer reduce anastomotic leak? A systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌前切除术后直肠管/经肛门支架置入是否降低吻合口漏?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;36(6):1123-1132. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03851-8. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
4
Comparison of complications and bowel function among different reconstruction techniques after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较低位前切除术后不同重建技术的并发症和肠道功能:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar 10;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02977-z.
5
Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经直肠系膜全切除术治疗低位直肠癌后,Turnbull-Cutait 延迟结肠直肠端端吻合经肛门拖出术与即刻结肠直肠端端吻合+预防性造口术的手术效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Aug;26(8):603-613. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02601-4. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
6
Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.机器人切除术与腹腔镜直肠切除术治疗癌症的比较:短期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;14(4):e134-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02907.x.
7
A systematic review of the function and complications of colonic pouches.结肠袋功能及并发症的系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 May;22(5):543-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0187-5. Epub 2006 Sep 13.
8
Efficacy of transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直肠癌前切除术后经肛门置管的疗效:一项系统评价和Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Mar 31;14:92. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0854-0.
9
Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma.直肠癌前切除术中回肠或结肠造口的覆盖。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006878.pub2.
10
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing clinical practice: The role of digital rectal examination in diagnosing functional defecation disorders.加强临床实践:直肠指检在功能性排便障碍诊断中的作用
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106471. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106471.
2
Development and validation of a histological calculator for anastomotic margins to predict anastomotic failure among rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.用于预测接受新辅助放化疗的直肠癌患者吻合口失败的吻合缘组织学计算器的开发与验证
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):1181. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14522-0.
3
Pathophysiology of anastomotic stricture following rectal anastomosis: Insights into mechanisms, risk factors, and preventive strategies.
直肠吻合术后吻合口狭窄的病理生理学:对机制、危险因素及预防策略的见解
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2025 Jun 22;16(2):107492. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v16.i2.107492.
4
Importance of the diameter of the mechanical suture in rectal surgery in relation to benign anastomotic stenosis. Cross-sectional observational study.直肠手术中机械缝合线直径与良性吻合口狭窄的关系。横断面观察性研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Jun 18;29(1):137. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03157-9.
5
Machine learning prediction model of prolonged delay to loop ileostomy closure after rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study.直肠癌手术后回肠造口关闭延迟的机器学习预测模型:一项回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 May 14;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03843-w.
6
Rectal stenosis after circular mechanical anastomosis; the influence of stapler size.圆形机械吻合术后的直肠狭窄;吻合器尺寸的影响
Surg Endosc. 2024 Dec;38(12):7261-7268. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11306-8. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
7
A nomogram of anastomotic stricture after rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis.直肠癌吻合口狭窄的列线图:一项回顾性队列分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3661-3671. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10885-w. Epub 2024 May 22.
8
Preoperative risk factors and cumulative incidence of temporary ileostomy non-closure after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.直肠癌保肛手术后临时性回肠造口还纳术失败的术前危险因素和累积发生率:一项荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr 12;22(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03363-z.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure during versus after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer.直肠癌患者辅助化疗期间与化疗后行回肠造口还纳术的临床结局。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar 20;2024:2410643. doi: 10.1155/2024/2410643. eCollection 2024.