Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
Research, Audit and Academic Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Nov;79(11):1525-1535. doi: 10.1007/s00228-023-03560-x. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
Nausea is a common and unpleasant sensation for which current therapies such as serotonin (5-HT) antagonists are often ineffective, while also conferring a risk of potential adverse events. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) has been proposed as a treatment for nausea. We aimed to compare IPA with 5-HT antagonists for the treatment of nausea across all clinical settings.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL and CINAHL were searched from inception to 17 July 2023 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing inhaled IPA and a 5-HT antagonist for treatment of nausea. Severity and duration of nausea, rescue antiemetic use, adverse events and patient satisfaction were the outcomes sought. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2. Random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Combination of meta-analyses and narrative review was used to synthesise findings. The evidence was appraised using GRADE.
From 1242 records, 4 RCTs were included with 382 participants. Participants receiving IPA had a significantly lower mean time to 50% reduction in nausea (MD - 20.06; 95% CI - 26.26, - 13.85). Nausea score reduction at 30 min was significantly greater in the IPA group (MD 21.47; 95% CI 15.47, 27.47). IPA led to significantly reduced requirement for rescue antiemetics (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.37, 0.95; p = 0.03). IPA led to no significant difference in patient satisfaction when compared with a 5-HT antagonist. The overall GRADE assessment of evidence quality ranged from very low to low.
IPA may provide rapid, effective relief of nausea when compared with 5-HT antagonists.
恶心是一种常见且令人不适的感觉,目前的治疗方法,如 5-羟色胺(5-HT)拮抗剂,往往效果不佳,同时还存在潜在不良事件的风险。异丙醇(IPA)已被提议用于治疗恶心。我们旨在比较 IPA 与 5-HT 拮抗剂在所有临床环境中治疗恶心的效果。
从建库到 2023 年 7 月 17 日,我们在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PubMed、CENTRAL 和 CINAHL 中检索了比较吸入 IPA 和 5-HT 拮抗剂治疗恶心的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们寻求的结局包括恶心的严重程度和持续时间、使用止吐急救药物、不良事件和患者满意度。使用 Cochrane RoB 2 评估偏倚风险(RoB)。我们使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。使用荟萃分析和叙述性综述相结合的方法来综合研究结果。使用 GRADE 评估证据质量。
从 1242 条记录中,我们纳入了 4 项 RCT,共有 382 名参与者。接受 IPA 的参与者达到恶心缓解 50%的时间明显缩短(MD-20.06;95%CI-26.26,-13.85)。IPA 组在 30 分钟时恶心评分的降低幅度明显更大(MD 21.47;95%CI 15.47,27.47)。IPA 显著减少了对急救止吐药物的需求(OR 0.60;95%CI 0.37,0.95;p=0.03)。与 5-HT 拮抗剂相比,IPA 对患者满意度没有显著差异。证据质量的总体 GRADE 评估范围从极低到低。
与 5-HT 拮抗剂相比,IPA 可能提供快速、有效的恶心缓解。