Unit of Neurosurgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2023 Nov;43(8):3833-3845. doi: 10.1007/s10571-023-01406-9. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
Liquid biopsy research on Low-Grade gliomas (LGG) has remained less conspicuous than that on other malignant brain tumors. Reliable serum markers would be precious for diagnosis, follow- up and treatment. We propose a clinical utility score (CUS) for biomarkers in LGG that mirrors their clinical usefulness. We conducted a PRISMA review. We examined each biomarker classifying them by CUS and Level of Evidence (LOE). We identified four classes of biomarkers: (1). Circulating protein-(a) vitronectin discriminates LGG from HGG (Sn:98%, Sp:91%, CUS: 3, LOE: III), (b) CTLA-4 discriminates LGG from HGG, (cutoff: 220.43 pg/ml, Sn: 82%, Sp: 78%, CUS:3, LOE:III), (c) pre-operative TGF b1 predict astrocytoma (cutoff: 2.52 ng/ml, Sn: 94.9%, Sp: 100%, CUS:3, LOE:VI). (2). micro-RNA (miR)-(a) miR-16 discriminates between WHO IV and WHO II and III groups (AUC = 0.98, CUS:3, LOE: III), (b) miR-454-3p is higher in HGG than in LGG (p = 0.013, CUS:3, LOE: III), (c) miR-210 expression is related to WHO grades (Sn 83.2%, Sp 94.3%, CUS: 3, LOE: III). (3). Circulating DNA-(a) IDH1R132H mutation detected in plasma by combined COLD and digital PCR (Sn: 60%, Sp: 100%, CUS: 3, LOE: III). 4. Exosomes-(a) SDC1 serum levels could discriminate GBM from LGG (Sn: 71%, Sp: 91%, CUS: 2C, LOE: VI). Our investigation showed that miRs appear to have the highest clinical utility. The LOE of the studies assessed is generally low. A combined approach between different biomarkers and traditional diagnostics may be considered. We identified four main classes of biomarkers produced by LGG. We examined each biomarker, classifying them by clinical utility score (CUS) and level of evidence (LOE). Micro-RNA (miRs) appears to have the highest CUS and LOE.
液体活检在低级别神经胶质瘤(LGG)中的研究一直不如其他恶性脑肿瘤显著。可靠的血清标志物对于诊断、随访和治疗非常宝贵。我们提出了一种用于 LGG 生物标志物的临床效用评分(CUS),以反映其临床实用性。我们进行了 PRISMA 综述。我们检查了每个生物标志物,根据 CUS 和证据水平(LOE)对其进行分类。我们确定了四类生物标志物:(1). 循环蛋白-(a)纤连蛋白区分 LGG 和 HGG(Sn:98%,Sp:91%,CUS:3,LOE:III),(b)CTLA-4 区分 LGG 和 HGG,(cutoff:220.43 pg/ml,Sn:82%,Sp:78%,CUS:3,LOE:III),(c)术前 TGF b1 预测星形细胞瘤(cutoff:2.52 ng/ml,Sn:94.9%,Sp:100%,CUS:3,LOE:VI)。(2). 微小 RNA(miR)-(a)miR-16 在 IV 级和 II 级和 III 级组之间区分(AUC=0.98,CUS:3,LOE:III),(b)miR-454-3p 在 HGG 中高于 LGG(p=0.013,CUS:3,LOE:III),(c)miR-210 表达与 WHO 分级相关(Sn 83.2%,Sp 94.3%,CUS:3,LOE:III)。(3). 循环 DNA-(a)通过联合 COLD 和数字 PCR 在血浆中检测到 IDH1R132H 突变(Sn:60%,Sp:100%,CUS:3,LOE:III)。4. 外泌体-(a)SDC1 血清水平可区分 GBM 和 LGG(Sn:71%,Sp:91%,CUS:2C,LOE:VI)。我们的研究表明,miRs 似乎具有最高的临床效用。评估的研究的 LOE 通常较低。可以考虑将不同生物标志物与传统诊断方法相结合。我们确定了 LGG 产生的四种主要类别的生物标志物。我们检查了每个生物标志物,根据临床效用评分(CUS)和证据水平(LOE)对其进行分类。微小 RNA(miRs)似乎具有最高的 CUS 和 LOE。