Ezeife Doreen A, Spackman Eldon, Juergens Rosalyn A, Laskin Janessa J, Agulnik Jason S, Hao Desiree, Laurie Scott A, Law Jennifer H, Le Lisa W, Kiedrowski Lesli A, Melosky Barbara, Shepherd Frances A, Cohen Victor, Wheatley-Price Paul, Vandermeer Rachel, Li Janice J, Fernandes Roxanne, Shokoohi Aria, Lanman Richard B, Leighl Natasha B
Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, 1331 29 St NW, Toronto, ON T2N 4N2, Canada University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Jul 26;14:17588359221112696. doi: 10.1177/17588359221112696. eCollection 2022.
Liquid biopsy (LB) can detect actionable genomic alterations in plasma circulating tumor circulating tumor DNA beyond tissue testing (TT) alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of adding LB to TT in the Canadian healthcare system.
A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a decision analytic Markov model from the Canadian public payer (Ontario) perspective and a 2-year time horizon in patients with treatment-naïve stage IV non-squamous NSCLC and ⩽10 pack-year smoking history. LB was performed using the comprehensive genomic profiling Guardant360™ assay. Standard of care TT for each participating institution was performed. Costs and outcomes of molecular testing by LB + TT were compared to TT alone. Transition probabilities were calculated from the VALUE trial (NCT03576937). Sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess uncertainty in the model.
Use of LB + TT identified actionable alterations in more patients, 68.5 52.7% with TT alone. Use of the LB + TT strategy resulted in an incremental cost savings of $3065 CAD per patient (95% CI, 2195-3945) and a gain in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.02 (95% CI, 0.01-0.02) TT alone. More patients received chemo-immunotherapy based on TT with higher overall costs, whereas more patients received targeted therapy based on LB + TT with net cost savings. Major drivers of cost-effectiveness were drug acquisition costs and prevalence of actionable alterations.
The addition of LB to TT as initial molecular testing of clinically selected patients with advanced NSCLC did not increase system costs and led to more patients receiving appropriate targeted therapy.
在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,液体活检(LB)能够检测血浆循环肿瘤DNA中可用于指导治疗的基因组改变,这是单纯组织检测(TT)所无法做到的。我们评估了在加拿大医疗体系中,将LB添加到TT中的成本效益。
采用决策分析马尔可夫模型,从加拿大公共支付方(安大略省)的角度,对初治IV期非鳞状NSCLC且吸烟史≤10包年的患者进行了为期2年的成本效益分析。使用综合基因组分析Guardant360™检测法进行LB检测。各参与机构均进行了标准的TT护理。将LB + TT分子检测的成本和结果与单纯TT进行比较。根据VALUE试验(NCT03576937)计算转移概率。进行敏感性分析以评估模型中的不确定性。
使用LB + TT能在更多患者中检测到可用于指导治疗的改变,单纯TT检测的患者比例为52.7%,而使用LB + TT策略的患者比例为68.5%。使用LB + TT策略每位患者可节省3065加元的增量成本(95%CI,2195 - 3945),质量调整生命年增加0.02(95%CI,0.01 - 0.02),高于单纯TT检测。更多患者基于TT接受了化疗免疫治疗,总体成本更高,而更多患者基于LB + TT接受了靶向治疗,净成本有所节省。成本效益的主要驱动因素是药物购置成本和可用于指导治疗的改变的患病率。
对于临床选择的晚期NSCLC患者,将LB添加到TT作为初始分子检测不会增加系统成本,且能使更多患者接受合适的靶向治疗。