Cui Tingting, Zhang Xuefeng, Wang Qiang, Yue Na, Bao Changjun, Jiang Renjie, Xu Shilin, Yuan Zhaohu, Qian Yunke, Chen Liling, Hang Hui, Zhang Zhong, Sun Hongmin, Jin Hui
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Hepatol Res. 2024 Feb;54(2):142-150. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13967. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis E vaccination strategies in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.
Based on the societal perspective, the cost-effectiveness of three hepatitis E vaccination strategies-vaccination without screening, screening-based vaccination, and no vaccination-among CHB patients was evaluated using a decision tree-Markov model, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Values for treatment costs and health utilities were estimated from a prior investigation on disease burden, and values for transition probabilities and vaccination-related costs were obtained from previous studies and government agencies. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken for assessing model uncertainties.
It was estimated that CHB patients superinfected with hepatitis E virus (HEV) incurred significantly longer disease course, higher economic burden, and more health loss compared to those with HEV infection alone (all p < 0.05). The ICERs of vaccination without screening and screening-based vaccination compared to no vaccination were 41,843.01 yuan/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and 29,147.32 yuan/QALY, respectively, both lower than China's per-capita gross domestic product (GDP) in 2018. The screening-based vaccination reduced the cost and gained more QALYs than vaccination without screening. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that vaccine price, vaccine protection rate, and decay rate of vaccine protection had the greatest impact on the cost-effectiveness analysis. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the base-case results, and if the willingness-to-pay value reached per-capita GDP, the probability that screening-based vaccination would be cost-effective was approaching 100%.
The disease burden in CHB patients superinfected with HEV is relatively heavy in China, and the screening-based hepatitis E vaccination strategy for CHB patients is the most cost-effective option.
本研究旨在评估戊型肝炎疫苗接种策略在慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者中的成本效益。
基于社会视角,采用决策树-马尔可夫模型评估CHB患者中三种戊型肝炎疫苗接种策略(无筛查接种、基于筛查的接种和不接种)的成本效益,并计算增量成本效益比(ICER)。治疗成本和健康效用值根据先前关于疾病负担的调查进行估算,转移概率和疫苗相关成本值则从先前研究和政府机构获取。进行敏感性分析以评估模型的不确定性。
据估计,与单纯感染戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)的患者相比,CHB患者合并感染HEV的病程显著更长,经济负担更高,健康损失更多(所有p<0.05)。与不接种相比,无筛查接种和基于筛查的接种的ICER分别为41,843.01元/质量调整生命年(QALY)和29,147.32元/QALY,均低于2018年中国的人均国内生产总值(GDP)。基于筛查的接种比无筛查接种降低了成本并获得了更多的QALY。单向敏感性分析显示,疫苗价格、疫苗保护率和疫苗保护衰减率对成本效益分析的影响最大。概率敏感性分析证实了基础病例结果,并且如果支付意愿值达到人均GDP,基于筛查的接种具有成本效益的概率接近100%。
在中国,CHB患者合并感染HEV的疾病负担相对较重,基于筛查的CHB患者戊型肝炎疫苗接种策略是最具成本效益的选择。