Suppr超能文献

血栓闭塞性脉管炎腔内斑块旋切术治疗的评估:单中心经验

Assessment of atherectomy treatment for Thromboangiitis Obliterans: A single center experience.

作者信息

Xue Song, Zhang Xing, Peng Zhaoxi, Wu Xiaoyu, Peng Zhiyou, Qin Jinbao, Lu Xinwu

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Oct;102(4):713-720. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30801. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endovascular recanalizaiton (ER) has been proven to be a feasible method for Thromboangiitis Obliterans (TAO). The aims of this study were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of atherectomy for TAO compared to nonatherectomy ER in our center.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed as TAO were reviewed from January 2016 to June 2021 in our center. Basic characteristics of patients before ER and perioperative data were collected and compared between the atherectomy and nonatherectomy groups. The vascular event-free survival and limb salvage were calculated to evaluate the prognosis of TAO patients after ERs. Logistic Regression and Cox Regression were used to identify the risk factors for technical failure and prognosis, respectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-two TAO patients with 79 lower limbs who met the criteria were included in this report. Compared with the nonatherectomy group, no significant improvement was identified in ER technical success, vascular event-free survival, or limb salvage in the atherectomy group. The total technical success rate was 91.1% (atherectomy group, 95.2%; nonatherectomy group, 89.7%), and the multiple limb involvement (p = 0.005; odds ratio [OR], 28.16; confidence interval [CI], 3.28-241.55) was the independent risk factor for technical failure. The total vascular event-free survival proportion was 66.05% and 58.40% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Technical failure (OR, 5.61; 95% CI, 1.57-20.04; p = 0.008), and runoff grade 0 (OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.09-9.85; p = 0.034) were independent risk factors for vascular events. The total limb salvage proportion at 1 and 3 years was 95.84% and 92.53%, respectively. Technical failure (OR, 8.54; 95% CI, 1.71-40.73; p = 0.02) was identified as an independent risk factor for above ankle amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference in prognosis was found between the atherectomy group and the nonatherectomy group during a midterm follow-up. The technical success of ER was crucial for TAO prognosis.

摘要

背景与目的

血管腔内再通术(ER)已被证明是治疗血栓闭塞性脉管炎(TAO)的一种可行方法。本研究的目的是评估在我们中心,与非旋切术式的ER相比,旋切术治疗TAO的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2021年6月在我们中心诊断为TAO的患者。收集ER术前患者的基本特征和围手术期数据,并在旋切术组和非旋切术组之间进行比较。计算无血管事件生存期和肢体挽救率,以评估TAO患者ER术后的预后。分别采用逻辑回归和Cox回归确定技术失败和预后的危险因素。

结果

本报告纳入了72例符合标准的TAO患者,共79条下肢。与非旋切术组相比,旋切术组在ER技术成功率、无血管事件生存期或肢体挽救率方面未发现显著改善。总技术成功率为91.1%(旋切术组为95.2%;非旋切术组为89.7%),多肢体受累(p = 0.005;比值比[OR],28.16;置信区间[CI],3.28 - 241.55)是技术失败的独立危险因素。1年和3年时无血管事件生存的总比例分别为66.05%和58.40%。技术失败(OR,5.61;95% CI,1.57 - 20.04;p = 0.008)和流出道0级(OR,3.28;95% CI,1.09 - 9.85;p = 0.034)是血管事件的独立危险因素。1年和3年时肢体挽救的总比例分别为95.84%和92.53%。技术失败(OR,8.54;95% CI,1.71 - 40.73;p = 0.02)被确定为踝关节以上截肢的独立危险因素。

结论

在中期随访期间,旋切术组和非旋切术组的预后无显著差异。ER的技术成功对TAO的预后至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验