• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字乳腺断层合成术随机对照试验前后的早期筛查结果。

Early screening outcomes before, during, and after a randomized controlled trial with digital breast tomosynthesis.

机构信息

Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2023 Oct;167:111069. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111069. Epub 2023 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111069
PMID:37708674
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe and compare early screening outcomes before, during and after a randomized controlled trial with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) including synthetic 2D mammography versus standard digital mammography (DM) (To-Be 1) and a follow-up cohort study using DBT (To-Be 2).

METHODS

Retrospective results of 125,020 screening examinations from four consecutive screening rounds performed in 2014-2021 were described and compared for pre-To-Be 1 (DM), To-Be 1 (DM or DBT), To-Be 2 (DBT), and post-To-Be 2 (DM) cohorts. Descriptive analyses of rates of recall, biopsy, screen-detected and interval cancer, distribution of histopathologic tumor characteristics and time spent on image interpretation and consensus were presented for the four rounds including five cohorts, one cohort in each screening round except for the To-Be 1 trail, which included a DBT and a DM cohort. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% CIs was calculated for recall and cancer detection rates.

RESULTS

Rate of screen-detected cancer was 0.90% for women screened with DBT in To-Be 2 and 0.64% for DM in pre-To-Be 1. The rates did not differ for the To-Be 1 DM (0.61%), To-Be 1 DBT (0.66%) and post-To-Be 2 DM (0.67%) cohorts. The interval cancer rates ranged between 0.13% and 0.20%. The distribution of histopathologic tumor characteristics did not differ between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening all women with DBT following a randomized controlled trial in an organized, population-based screening program showed a temporary increase in the rate of screen-detected cancer.

摘要

目的

描述并比较在一项数字乳腺断层合成摄影术(DBT)与标准数字乳腺摄影术(DM)(To-Be 1)的随机对照试验之前、期间和之后的早期筛查结果,以及使用 DBT 的随访队列研究(To-Be 2)。

方法

回顾性分析了 2014 年至 2021 年连续四次筛查中 125020 例筛查检查的结果,比较了 To-Be 1(DM)、To-Be 1(DM 或 DBT)、To-Be 2(DBT)和 To-Be 2(DM)队列的结果。对四个筛查轮次包括五个队列(除了 To-Be 1 试验,该试验包括 DBT 和 DM 队列)的五个队列的召回率、活检率、筛查检出癌和间隔癌、组织病理学肿瘤特征分布以及图像解读和共识所花费的时间进行描述性分析。计算了召回率和癌症检出率的比值比(OR)和 95%可信区间(CI)。

结果

在 To-Be 2 中,接受 DBT 筛查的女性中筛查检出癌的比例为 0.90%,而在 pre-To-Be 1 中为 0.64%。To-Be 1 DM(0.61%)、To-Be 1 DBT(0.66%)和 post-To-Be 2 DM(0.67%)队列的比例没有差异。间隔癌的比例在 0.13%至 0.20%之间。队列之间组织病理学肿瘤特征的分布没有差异。

结论

在一项有组织的、基于人群的筛查计划中,对所有女性进行 DBT 筛查后,随机对照试验显示筛查检出癌的比例暂时增加。

相似文献

1
Early screening outcomes before, during, and after a randomized controlled trial with digital breast tomosynthesis.数字乳腺断层合成术随机对照试验前后的早期筛查结果。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Oct;167:111069. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111069. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
3
Interval and Subsequent Round Breast Cancer in a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography Screening.数字乳腺断层合成与数字乳腺钼靶筛查比较的随机对照试验中间期和后续乳腺癌。
Radiology. 2021 Jul;300(1):66-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021203936. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.基于人群的筛查项目中数字乳腺断层合成摄影与标准数字乳腺钼靶摄影连续检查的筛查结果。
Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6991-6999. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06264-y. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
5
Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.连续 5 年使用数字乳腺断层合成技术进行筛查:按筛查年度和轮次的结果。
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):285-293. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191751. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
Comparing Screening Outcomes for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammography by Automated Breast Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial: Results from the To-Be Trial.在一项随机对照试验中,通过自动乳腺密度比较数字乳腺断层合成和数字乳腺 X 线摄影的筛查结果:来自 To-Be 试验的结果。
Radiology. 2020 Dec;297(3):522-531. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201150. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
7
Digital breast tomosynthesis in mammographic screening: false negative cancer cases in the To-Be 1 trial.乳腺钼靶筛查中的数字乳腺断层合成:To-Be 1试验中的假阴性癌症病例
Insights Imaging. 2024 Feb 8;15(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01604-5.
8
Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.数字乳腺断层合成摄影与数字乳腺钼靶摄影的有效性比较:3 年乳腺癌筛查的结果分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;2(6):737-43. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5536.
9
Interval and Consecutive Round Breast Cancer after Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography in BreastScreen Norway.挪威乳腺筛查中数字乳腺断层合成摄影与标准二维数字乳腺钼靶筛查后间期及连续乳腺癌
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):256-264. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191337. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
10
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.数字乳腺断层合成摄影术和数字乳腺钼靶摄影与数字乳腺钼靶摄影的比较:基于人群的筛查计划中的评估。
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):787-794. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018171361. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Mammographic density by time and breast: a retrospective cohort study from BreastScreen Norway.不同时间及不同乳房的乳腺钼靶密度:来自挪威乳腺筛查项目的一项回顾性队列研究
Breast Cancer Res. 2025 May 16;27(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-02037-2.