Suppr超能文献

回顾性评估匹兹堡大学医学中心队列中的产后生长和早产儿视网膜病变(G-ROP)和科罗拉多早产儿视网膜病变(CO-ROP)筛查算法。

Retrospective evaluation of Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) and Colorado Retinopathy of Prematurity (CO-ROP) screening algorithms in University of Pittsburgh Medical Centers cohort.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus, and Adult Motility, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Division of Pediatric Ophthalmology, Strabismus, and Adult Motility, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J AAPOS. 2023 Oct;27(5):289-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Sep 13.

Abstract

Of the 70,000 infants screened for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) each year in the United States, only 43% develop any ROP, and <10% develop treatment-requiring ROP. Investigators have tried to develop new methods for determining more specific screening criteria, including the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) and Colorado Retinopathy of Prematurity (CO-ROP), to reduce the number of infants being screened while maintaining a high degree of sensitivity. We evaluated the records of 138 premature infants who received treatment for ROP between 2010 and 2021 with respect to G-ROP (129 infants) and CO-ROP (102 infants) to test the sensitivity of each. Using the G-ROP criteria, 0.8% (1/129) of treated infants had type 1 ROP that would have been missed and 3.1% (4/129) of total infants treated were missed. These infants would not have been screened or received treatment if G-ROP guidelines were followed. Using the CO-ROP criteria, 2% (2/102) of treated infants had type 1 ROP that would have been missed and 4.9% (5/102) of total infants treated were missed. In our study cohort, both sets of criteria proved less sensitive than our current screening guidelines.

摘要

在美国,每年有 70000 名婴儿接受早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)筛查,只有 43%的婴儿患有 ROP,<10%的婴儿需要治疗 ROP。研究人员试图开发新的方法来确定更具体的筛查标准,包括产后生长与早产儿视网膜病变(G-ROP)和科罗拉多早产儿视网膜病变(CO-ROP),以减少需要筛查的婴儿数量,同时保持高敏感性。我们评估了 2010 年至 2021 年间接受 ROP 治疗的 138 名早产儿的记录,涉及 G-ROP(129 名婴儿)和 CO-ROP(102 名婴儿),以测试每种方法的敏感性。使用 G-ROP 标准,0.8%(1/129)接受治疗的婴儿患有 1 型 ROP,这将被遗漏,3.1%(129 名接受治疗的婴儿总数)被遗漏。如果遵循 G-ROP 指南,这些婴儿将不会被筛查或接受治疗。使用 CO-ROP 标准,2%(2/102)接受治疗的婴儿患有 1 型 ROP,这将被遗漏,4.9%(102 名接受治疗的婴儿总数)被遗漏。在我们的研究队列中,这两套标准都不如我们目前的筛查指南敏感。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验