Suppr超能文献

基于中国外科手术部位感染监测的2018至2021年中国急诊腹部手术后手术部位感染调查及因素分析

[Investigation and factor analysis of postoperative surgical site infections in emergency abdominal surgery in China from 2018 to 2021 based on Chinese SSI Surveillance].

作者信息

Zheng Z Q, Liu Y Y, Luo W W, Zhang H W, Wang Y Y, Wang H, Li X M, Chen H P, Li Y, Jin W D, Huang H, Guan Y T, Zhang H M, Li S K, Ren J A, Wang P G

机构信息

Department of Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 25;26(9):827-836. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230619-00216.

Abstract

We investigated the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) following emergency abdominal surgery (EAS) in China and further explored its risk factors, providing a reference for preventing and controlling SSI after EAS. This was an observational study. Data of patients who had undergone EAS and been enrolled in the Chinese SSI Surveillance Program during 2018-2021were retrospectively analyzed. All included patients had been followed up for 30 days after surgery. The analyzed data consisted of relevant patient characteristics and perioperative clinical data, including preoperative hemoglobin, albumin, and blood glucose concentrations, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, grade of surgical incision, intestinal preparation, skin preparation, location of surgical site, approach, and duration. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI occurring within 30 days following EAS. SSI was defined as both superficial and deep incisional infections and organ/space infections, diagnoses being supported by results of microbiological culture of secretions and pus. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative mortality rates, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), duration of postoperative hospitalization, and associated costs. The patients were classified into two groups, SSI and non-SSI, based on whether an infection had been diagnosed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with SSI following EAS. The study cohort comprised 5491 patients who had undergone EAS, comprising 3169 male and 2322 female patients. SSIs were diagnosed in 168 (3.1%) patients after EAS (SSI group); thus, the non-SSI group consisted of 5323 patients. The SSIs comprised superficial incision infections in 69 (41.1%), deep incision infections in 51 (30.4%), and organ or space infections in 48 (28.6%). Cultures of secretions and pus were positive in 115 (68.5%) cases. The most frequently detected organism was Escherichia coli (47/115; 40.9%). There were no significant differences in sex or body mass index between the SSI and non-SSI groups (both >0.05). However, the proportion of individuals aged 60 years or older was significantly greater in the SSI than in the non-SSI group (49.4% [83/168] vs. 27.5% [1464/5323), χ=38.604, <0.001). Compared with the non-SSI group, the SSI group had greater proportions of patients with diabetes (11.9% [20/168] vs. 4.8% [258/5323], χ=16.878, <0.001), hypertension (25.6% [43/168] vs. 12.2% [649/5323], χ=26.562, <0.001); hemoglobin <110 g/L (27.4% [46/168] vs. 13.1% [697/5323], χ=28.411, <0.001), and albuminemia <30 g/L (24.4% [41/168] vs. 5.9% [316/5323], χ=91.352, <0.001), and a reduced rate of preoperative skin preparation (66.7% [112/168] vs. 75.9% [4039/5323], χ=7.491, =0.006). Furthermore, fewer patients in the SSI group had preoperative ASA scores of between one and two (56.0% [94/168] vs. 88.7% [4724/5323], χ=162.869, <0.001) in the non-SSI group. The incidences of contaminated and infected incisions were greater in the SSI group (63.1% [106/168] vs. 38.6% [2056/5323], χ=40.854, <0.001). There was a significant difference in surgical site distribution between the SSI and non-SSI groups (small intestine 29.8% [50/168] vs. 10.6% [565/5323], colorectal 26.2% [44/168] vs. 5.6% [298/5 323], and appendix 24.4% [41/168] vs. 65.1% [3465/5323]) χ=167.897, <0.001), respectively. There was a significantly lower proportion of laparoscope or robotic surgery in the non-SSI group (24.4 % [41/168] vs. 74.2% [3949/5323], χ=203.199, <0.001); the percentage of operations of duration less than 2 hours was significantly lower in the SSI than non-SSI group (35.7% [60/168] vs. 77.4% [4119/5323], χ=155.487, <0.001). As to clinical outcomes, there was a higher 30-day postoperative mortality rate (3.0%[5/168] vs. 0.2%[10/5323], χ=36.807, <0.001) and higher postoperative ICU occupancy rate (41.7% [70/168] vs. 19.7% [1046/5323], χ=48.748, <0.001) in the SSI group. The median length of stay in the ICU (0[2] vs. 0[0] days, =328597.000, <0.001), median total length of stay after surgery (16[13] vs. 6[5] days, =128146.000, <0.001), and median hospitalization cost (ten thousand yuan, 4.7[4.4] vs. 1.7[1.8], =175965.000, <0.001) were all significantly greater in the SSI group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the absence of skin preparation before surgery (OR=2.435,95%CI: 1.690-3.508, <0.001), preoperative albuminemia <30 g/L (OR=1.680, 95%CI: 1.081-2.610, =0.021), contaminated or infected incisions (OR=3.031, 95%CI: 2.151-4.271, <0.001), and laparotomy (OR=3.436, 95% CI: 2.123-5.564, <0.001) were independent risk factors of SSI. Operative duration less than 2 hours (OR=0.465, 95%CI: 0.312-0.695, <0.001) and ASA score of 1-2 (OR=0.416, 95% CI: 0.289-0.601, <0.001) were identified as independent protective factors for SSI. It is important to consider the nutritional status in the perioperative period of patients undergoing EAS. Preoperative skin preparation should be conducted and, whenever possible, laparoscope or robot-assisted surgery. Duration of surgery should be as short as possible while maintaining surgery quality and improving patient care.

摘要

我们调查了中国急诊腹部手术(EAS)后手术部位感染(SSI)的发生率,并进一步探讨了其危险因素,为EAS后SSI的预防和控制提供参考。这是一项观察性研究。对2018 - 2021年期间接受EAS并纳入中国SSI监测项目的患者数据进行回顾性分析。所有纳入患者术后均随访30天。分析的数据包括相关患者特征和围手术期临床数据,包括术前血红蛋白、白蛋白和血糖浓度、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、手术切口等级、肠道准备、皮肤准备、手术部位、入路和手术时长。主要结局是EAS后30天内发生SSI的发生率。SSI定义为表浅和深部切口感染以及器官/腔隙感染,诊断由分泌物和脓液的微生物培养结果支持。次要结局包括术后30天死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时长、术后住院时间及相关费用。根据是否诊断感染将患者分为两组,即SSI组和非SSI组。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以确定与EAS后SSI相关的危险因素。研究队列包括5491例接受EAS的患者,其中男性3169例,女性2322例。EAS后168例(3.1%)患者被诊断为SSI(SSI组);因此,非SSI组由5323例患者组成。SSI包括表浅切口感染69例(41.1%)、深部切口感染51例(30.4%)和器官或腔隙感染48例(28.6%)。115例(68.5%)病例的分泌物和脓液培养呈阳性。最常检测到的病原体是大肠埃希菌(47/115;40.9%)。SSI组和非SSI组在性别或体重指数方面无显著差异(均>0.05)。然而,SSI组中60岁及以上个体的比例显著高于非SSI组(49.4% [83/168] 对27.5% [1464/5323],χ = 38.604,<0.001)。与非SSI组相比,SSI组糖尿病患者比例更高(11.9% [20/168] 对4.8% [258/5323],χ = 16.878,<0.001)、高血压患者比例更高(25.6% [43/168] 对12.2% [649/5323],χ = 26.562,<0.001);血红蛋白<110 g/L的患者比例更高(27.4% [46/168] 对13.1% [697/5323],χ = 28.411,<0.001),低蛋白血症<30 g/L的患者比例更高(24.4% [41/168] 对5.9% [316/5323],χ = 91.352,<0.001),术前皮肤准备率更低(66.7% [112/168] 对75.9% [4039/5323],χ = 7.491,=0.006)。此外,SSI组术前ASA评分为1至2分的患者比例低于非SSI组(56.0% [94/168] 对88.7% [4724/5323],χ = 162.869,<0.001)。SSI组污染和感染切口的发生率更高(63.1% [106/168] 对38.6% [2056/5323],χ = 40.854,<0.001)。SSI组和非SSI组的手术部位分布存在显著差异(小肠29.8% [50/168] 对10.6% [565/5323],结直肠26.2% [44/168] 对5.6% [298/5323],阑尾24.4% [41/168] 对65.1% [3465/5323])χ = 167.897,<0.001)。非SSI组腹腔镜或机器人手术的比例显著更低(24.4 % [41/168] 对74.2% [3949/5323],χ = 203.199,<0.001);SSI组手术时长小于2小时的手术比例显著低于非SSI组(35.7% [60/168] 对77.4% [4119/5323],χ = 155.487,<0.001)。关于临床结局,SSI组术后30天死亡率更高(3.0%[5/168] 对0.2%[10/5323],χ = 36.807,<0.001),术后ICU入住率更高(41.7% [70/168] 对19.7% [1046/5323],χ = 48.748,<0.001)。SSI组ICU住院中位时长(0[2] 对0[0] 天,=328597.000,<0.001)、术后总住院中位时长(16[13] 对6[5] 天,=128146.000,<0.001)和中位住院费用(万元,4.7[4.4] 对1.7[1.8],=175965.000,<0.001)均显著更高。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,术前未进行皮肤准备(OR = 2.435,95%CI:1.690 - 3.508,<0.001)、术前低蛋白血症<30 g/L(OR = 1.680,95%CI:1.081 - 2.610,=0.021)、污染或感染切口(OR = 3.031,95%CI:2.151 - 4.271,<0.001)和开腹手术(OR = 3.436,95%CI:2.123 - 5.564,<0.001)是SSI的独立危险因素。手术时长小于2小时(OR = 0.465,95%CI:0.312 - 0.695,<0.001)和ASA评分为1 - 2分(OR = 0.416,95%CI:0.289 - 0.601,<0.001)被确定为SSI的独立保护因素。在EAS患者围手术期考虑营养状况很重要。应进行术前皮肤准备,并尽可能采用腹腔镜或机器人辅助手术。手术时长应在保持手术质量和改善患者护理的同时尽可能缩短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验