Tadokoro Naoki, Kainuma Satoshi, Kawamoto Naonori, Kakuta Takashi, Tonai Kohei, Shimizu Hideyuki, Fujita Tomoyuki, Fukushima Satsuki
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 6-1 Kishibeshimmachi, Suita, Osaka, 564-8565, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 May;72(5):324-330. doi: 10.1007/s11748-023-01974-z. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
Progression of aortic insufficiency during left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is a crucial topic. One treatment option is aortic valvuloplasty (AVP); however, there is controversy regarding its safety and efficacy. We investigated the safety and efficacy of AVP using the coaptation stitch method (Park's stitch) performed for de novo aortic insufficiency.
Between 2013 and 2020, 175 consecutive patients underwent LVAD implantation, of which 7 patients [men, 2 (28.6%); median age, 55 years] underwent late-stage AVP. Two patients underwent AVP within 2 weeks, and the remaining six patients underwent AVP 3, 19, 24, 28, 42, and 49 months, respectively, after LVAD implantation.
Preoperatively, the degree of aortic insufficiency was moderate in 6 (85.7%) patients and severe in 1 (14.3%) patient. AVP was technically successful in 6 (85.7%) patients, while one case of failed plasty was subsequently treated with bioprosthetic valve replacement. A 1-year post-AVP right heart catheterization study revealed a median pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 10.0 mmHg. No deaths or heart failure admissions occurred during the follow-up (median, 38.0 months). There was no aortic insufficiency in 2 (28.6%) patients; however, trivial AI was observed in 3 (42.8%) patients, and mild AI was observed in 1 (14.3%) patient 2 years postoperatively. However, at the 3-year follow-up, two patients developed an increase in AI grade from trivial to mild.
AVP using Park's stitch was safe. It is critical to carefully observe the aortic valve during AVP surgery to ensure that AVP is appropriate.
在左心室辅助装置(LVAD)支持期间主动脉瓣关闭不全的进展是一个关键话题。一种治疗选择是主动脉瓣成形术(AVP);然而,其安全性和有效性存在争议。我们研究了采用对合缝线法(帕克缝线法)治疗新发主动脉瓣关闭不全的AVP的安全性和有效性。
2013年至2020年期间,175例连续患者接受了LVAD植入,其中7例患者[男性,2例(28.6%);中位年龄55岁]接受了晚期AVP。2例患者在2周内接受了AVP,其余6例患者分别在LVAD植入后3、19、24、28、42和49个月接受了AVP。
术前,6例(85.7%)患者的主动脉瓣关闭不全程度为中度,1例(14.3%)患者为重度。6例(85.7%)患者的AVP在技术上成功,而1例成形失败的病例随后接受了生物瓣膜置换。AVP术后1年的右心导管检查显示,肺动脉楔压中位数为10.0 mmHg。随访期间(中位时间38.0个月)未发生死亡或心力衰竭住院。2例(28.6%)患者无主动脉瓣关闭不全;然而,术后2年,3例(42.8%)患者出现轻微主动脉瓣反流,1例(14.3%)患者出现轻度主动脉瓣反流。然而,在3年随访时,2例患者的主动脉瓣反流分级从轻微增加到轻度。
采用帕克缝线法的AVP是安全的。在AVP手术期间仔细观察主动脉瓣以确保AVP合适至关重要。