Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Social Work, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Scand J Pain. 2023 Sep 18;24(1). doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2023-0002. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS). METHODS: Standard forward-backward translation was used. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among treatment seeking individuals with chronic pain included in a clinical cohort. Internal consistency was measured with Cronbach's α, test-retest reliability was examined with intraclass correlation, confirmatory factor analyses was used for examining factor structure, and correlations between the MOS-SSS and selected health validity measures were used for testing concurrent validity hypotheses. RESULTS: 182 participants were included in the study. Internal consistency measured with Cronbach's alpha was acceptable for all subscales and for the total support index of the MOS-SSS. Test-retest reliability was moderate - good for the different subscales, and was good for the overall support index. The original four factor model of the MOS-SSS was confirmed, and the concurrent validity hypotheses were also confirmed; however, the associations were weaker than expected. CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish version of the MOS-SSS was found psychometrically sound and offers a systematic assessment of social support in specialized pain care.
目的:本研究旨在检验瑞典版医疗结局研究社会支持量表(MOS-SSS)的心理测量特性。
方法:采用标准的正向-反向翻译法。对纳入临床队列的慢性疼痛治疗人群进行横断面调查。采用克朗巴赫 α 系数评估内部一致性,采用组内相关系数评估重测信度,采用验证性因子分析评估因子结构,采用 MOS-SSS 与选定健康有效性测量指标之间的相关性检验同时效性假设。
结果:本研究共纳入 182 名参与者。克朗巴赫 α 系数评估的所有子量表和 MOS-SSS 的总支持指数的内部一致性可接受。不同子量表的重测信度为中-高度,总支持指数的重测信度良好。MOS-SSS 的原始四因子模型得到了确认,同时效性假设也得到了确认;然而,关联比预期的要弱。
结论:瑞典版 MOS-SSS 在心理测量学上表现良好,为专门的疼痛护理中的社会支持提供了系统的评估。
Springerplus. 2016-8-9