Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.
Centre for Oral Growth & Development, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Jan;62(1):79-86. doi: 10.1177/10556656231201491. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
To assess the factors influencing the type and timing of Alveolar Bone Grafting (ABG) among cleft centers throughout India. To examine the decision-making criteria for orthodontic treatment and the timing of ABG.
Cross sectional survey.
This survey was based on a convenience-based sample selected from cleft teams across India. The survey was formulated using the SurveyMonkey platform and emailed to 40 cleft teams. The survey included questions on demographics, timing, surgical protocol, orthodontic protocol, radiograph prescription rate, assessment methods for the success of ABG and three scenarios for evaluating the timing of the bone graft. The Chi-squared test was performed to evaluate the difference in opinion between specialists. The inter-examiner reliability was assessed using Kappa statistics.
Thirty-five units completed the questionnaire. Most units operate with 1-2 surgeons, with 42.9% of them treating cleft patients for under 5 years. Only 11.4% of centres routinely advised oblique occlusal radiographs for post-surgery evaluation, and 31.4% prescribed CBCT. However, 40% of cleft teams did not perform audits to evaluate the success of ABG, and less than 50% advised radiographs six months post-surgery. Around 26% of centres do not routinely provide orthodontic treatment pre-ABG. The inter-examiner reliability for case scenarios showed poor agreement between the clinicians.
The survey showed a serious lack of consensus in the ABG treatment among cleft teams in India and emphasises the need for standardised protocols for the treatment of children with cleft palate. There is an urgent need to develop core outcome set in cleft.
评估影响印度各腭裂中心牙槽骨移植(ABG)类型和时机的因素。研究正畸治疗的决策标准和 ABG 的时机。
横断面调查。
本调查基于从印度腭裂团队中选择的便利样本。该调查使用 SurveyMonkey 平台制定,并通过电子邮件发送给 40 个腭裂团队。调查包括人口统计学、时间、手术方案、正畸方案、放射线照片处方率、ABG 成功率评估方法以及三种评估骨移植时机的方案。采用卡方检验评估专家意见的差异。采用 Kappa 统计评估检查者间的可靠性。
35 个单位完成了问卷。大多数单位有 1-2 名外科医生,其中 42.9%的单位治疗腭裂患者的时间不到 5 年。只有 11.4%的中心常规建议术后评估使用斜位咬合射线照片,31.4%的中心建议使用 CBCT。然而,40%的腭裂团队没有进行审计来评估 ABG 的成功率,不到 50%的团队建议术后 6 个月拍摄射线照片。约 26%的中心不在 ABG 前常规提供正畸治疗。病例情景的检查者间可靠性显示临床医生之间的一致性很差。
调查显示印度腭裂团队在 ABG 治疗方面严重缺乏共识,并强调需要制定腭裂儿童治疗的标准化方案。迫切需要制定腭裂核心结局集。