Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, China.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Adv Ther. 2023 Nov;40(11):4945-4956. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02679-8. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
This study examined the cost-effectiveness of first-line toripalimab plus chemotherapy (TC) for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), excluding patients with nonsquamous NSCLC and EGFR/ALK mutations. It further analyzed the cost-effectiveness of this strategy in biomarker-based subgroups, all within the context of the Chinese healthcare system.
Eighteen Markov models with 21-day Markov cycle lengths and 30-year time horizons were constructed in this study. Clinical effectiveness data were derived from the CHOICE-01 trial. Health state utilities and costs data were obtained from various sources. The primary outputs were the calculation of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were then compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $17,961 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). This comparison was used to determine the treatment that offered greater cost-effectiveness. To account for uncertainty in the model, sensitivity analyses were conducted.
For the overall patient population, the estimated ICER between first-line TC and placebo plus chemotherapy (PC) was $9445/QALY, significantly lower than the WTP threshold used in the model. In subgroups based on pathologic types, first-line TC had an ICER of $16,757/QALY for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, slightly below the WTP threshold; first-line TC demonstrated dominance in patients with squamous NSCLC, indicating both better effectiveness and lower costs compared to first-line PC. In biomarkers-based subgroups, first-line TC was dominant over first-line PC in the subgroups with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50% and SMARCA4 mutations. Moreover, first-line TC had ICERs lower than the WTP threshold in other subgroups, except for the subgroup with RB1 mutations. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings.
From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, this study's findings suggested that first-line TC represents a cost-effective strategy for patients with advanced NSCLC. However, the cost-effectiveness of first-line TC varied across different subgroups when considering predictive biomarkers.
本研究考察了一线替雷利珠单抗联合化疗(TC)在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的成本效益,这些患者不包括非鳞 NSCLC 和 EGFR/ALK 突变患者。本研究还进一步分析了该策略在基于生物标志物的亚组中的成本效益,所有这些均在中国医疗保健系统的背景下进行。
本研究构建了 18 个 21 天 Markov 周期和 30 年时间范围的 Markov 模型。临床疗效数据来自 CHOICE-01 试验。健康状态效用和成本数据来自不同来源。主要输出结果是增量成本效益比(ICER)的计算,然后将其与 17961 美元/QALY 的意愿支付(WTP)阈值进行比较。该比较用于确定具有更高成本效益的治疗方法。为了考虑模型中的不确定性,进行了敏感性分析。
对于总体患者人群,一线 TC 与安慰剂联合化疗(PC)相比的估计 ICER 为 9445 美元/QALY,明显低于模型中使用的 WTP 阈值。在基于病理类型的亚组中,一线 TC 用于非鳞 NSCLC 患者的 ICER 为 16757 美元/QALY,略低于 WTP 阈值;一线 TC 在鳞 NSCLC 患者中表现出优势,与一线 PC 相比,疗效更好,成本更低。在基于生物标志物的亚组中,一线 TC 在 PD-L1 表达≥50%和 SMARCA4 突变的亚组中优于一线 PC。此外,一线 TC 在其他亚组中的 ICER 低于 WTP 阈值,除了 RB1 突变亚组。敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性。
从中国医疗保健系统的角度来看,本研究的结果表明,一线 TC 是晚期 NSCLC 患者的一种具有成本效益的治疗策略。然而,当考虑预测生物标志物时,一线 TC 在不同亚组中的成本效益存在差异。