Suppr超能文献

中国一线托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的成本效益分析

A cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line toripalimab plus chemotherapy in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer in China.

作者信息

Zheng Zhiwei, Zhu Gaofeng, Cao Xueqiong, Cai Hongfu, Zhu Huide

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Mar;16(3):267-273. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2188194. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compares first-line toripalimab with chemotherapy for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A three-state Markov model was established to compare the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of first-line toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy. Clinical outcomes data were acquired from the CHOICE-01 clinical trials. Costs and utilities were gathered from regional databases or published publications. One-way sensitivity and probability sensitivity analyses were used to investigate the stability of the model parameters.

RESULTS

First-line toripalimab treatment for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC resulted in an incremental cost of $16,214.03 and added 0.77 QALYs compared to chemotherapy, which had an ICER of $21,057.18 per QALY gained. The ICER was substantially lower than the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold in China, which was $37,663.26 per QALY. The toripalimab cycle used was shown to have the greatest impact on the ICERs, according to sensitivity analysis, although none of the factors significantly affected the model's outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Toripalimab plus chemotherapy is likely to be a cost-effective option compared with chemotherapy alone for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

摘要

背景

本研究从中国医疗保健系统的角度比较了一线托瑞帕利单抗与化疗治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的效果。

研究设计与方法

建立了一个三状态马尔可夫模型,以比较一线托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗的质量调整生命年(QALY)和增量成本效益比(ICER)。临床结局数据来自CHOICE-01临床试验。成本和效用数据来自区域数据库或已发表的文献。采用单向敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析来研究模型参数的稳定性。

结果

与化疗相比,一线使用托瑞帕利单抗治疗晚期非鳞状NSCLC增加了16,214.03美元的成本,但增加了0.77个QALY,ICER为每获得一个QALY 21,057.18美元。该ICER远低于中国的支付意愿(WTP)阈值,即每QALY 37,663.26美元。敏感性分析表明,使用托瑞帕利单抗的周期对ICER影响最大,不过没有一个因素对模型结果有显著影响。

结论

从中国医疗保健系统的角度来看,对于晚期非鳞状NSCLC患者,与单纯化疗相比,托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗可能是一种具有成本效益的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验