• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公民参与使用数字工具进行 COVID-19 接触者追踪:一项探索公民观点和需求的定性研究。

Citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing with digital tools: a qualitative study to explore citizens' perspectives and needs.

机构信息

National Coordination Centre for Communicable Disease Control, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x
PMID:37716982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10504771/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contact tracing (CT) is a key strategy when dealing with outbreaks of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. The scale of the COVID-19 pandemic has often left public health professionals (PHPs), who are responsible for the execution of CT, unable to keep up with the rapid and largescale spread of the virus. To enhance or support its execution, and potentially lower the workload for PHPs, citizens may be more actively involved in CT-tasks that are commonly executed by PHPs (referred to as 'self-led CT'). There is limited insight into citizens' perspectives on and needs for self-led CT for COVID-19. This study aims to explore the perspectives and needs of Dutch citizens on taking more responsibilities in the execution of CT for COVID-19, potentially through the use of digital tools.

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative study was performed, in which online semi-structured interviews were conducted. Questions were based on the Reasoned Action Approach and Health Belief Model. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify citizens' perspectives and needs to participate in self-led CT.

RESULTS

We conducted 27 interviews with Dutch citizens. Seven main themes were identified from the interviews: 1) 'Citizens' perspectives on self-led CT are influenced by prior experiences with regular CT', 2) 'Citizens' felt responsibilities and the perceived responsibilities of the PHS in CT shape their perspectives on self-led CT', 3) 'Anticipated impacts of self-led CT on the CT-process', 4) 'Citizens' attitude towards the application of self-led CT depends on their own perceived skills and the willingness and skills of others', 5) 'Shame and social stigma may hamper participation in self-led CT', 6) 'Concerns about privacy and data security: a barrier for self-led CT', and 7) 'Citizens' perspectives and anticipated needs for the implementation and application of self-led CT in practice'.

CONCLUSIONS

Most interviewees hold a positive attitude towards self-led CT and using digital tools for this purpose. However, their intention for self-led CT may depend on various factors, such as prior experiences with regular CT, and their perceived self-efficacy to participate. Perspectives and needs of citizens should be considered for the future implementation of self-led CT in practice.

摘要

背景

接触者追踪(CT)是应对 COVID-19 等传染病爆发的关键策略。COVID-19 大流行的规模常常使负责执行 CT 的公共卫生专业人员(PHPs)无法跟上病毒的快速大规模传播。为了增强或支持其执行,并可能降低 PHPs 的工作量,公民可能会更积极地参与通常由 PHPs 执行的 CT 任务(称为“自我主导 CT”)。对于公民对 COVID-19 自我主导 CT 的看法和需求,了解有限。本研究旨在探讨荷兰公民对在执行 COVID-19 接触者追踪方面承担更多责任的看法和需求,可能通过使用数字工具。

方法

进行了一项探索性定性研究,其中进行了在线半结构化访谈。问题基于理性行为理论和健康信念模型。访谈进行了录音并逐字记录。进行了主题分析,以确定公民参与自我主导 CT 的观点和需求。

结果

我们对 27 名荷兰公民进行了访谈。从访谈中确定了七个主要主题:1)“公民对自我主导 CT 的看法受其对常规 CT 的先前经验的影响”;2)“公民对自己在 CT 中的责任和 PHPS 的感知责任塑造了他们对自我主导 CT 的看法”;3)“自我主导 CT 对 CT 过程的预期影响”;4)“公民对自我主导 CT 的态度取决于他们自己的感知技能以及他人的意愿和技能”;5)“羞耻感和社会耻辱感可能会阻碍自我主导 CT 的参与”;6)“对隐私和数据安全的担忧:自我主导 CT 的障碍”;7)“公民对自我主导 CT 在实践中的实施和应用的看法和预期需求”。

结论

大多数受访者对自我主导 CT 和为此目的使用数字工具持积极态度。然而,他们对自我主导 CT 的意愿可能取决于各种因素,例如常规 CT 的先前经验以及他们参与的自我效能感。应该考虑公民的观点和需求,以便在实践中实施自我主导 CT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d787/10504771/e1ba0e3d88ce/12889_2023_16664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d787/10504771/ab2b095d701e/12889_2023_16664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d787/10504771/e1ba0e3d88ce/12889_2023_16664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d787/10504771/ab2b095d701e/12889_2023_16664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d787/10504771/e1ba0e3d88ce/12889_2023_16664_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing with digital tools: a qualitative study to explore citizens' perspectives and needs.公民参与使用数字工具进行 COVID-19 接触者追踪:一项探索公民观点和需求的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x.
2
Dutch public health professionals' perspectives and needs regarding citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing through digital support tools: an exploratory qualitative study.荷兰公共卫生专业人员对通过数字支持工具让公民参与新冠病毒接触者追踪的看法和需求:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):1378. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08764-y.
3
Online respondent-driven detection for enhanced contact tracing of close-contact infectious diseases: benefits and barriers for public health practice.在线受访者驱动检测增强密切接触传染病的接触者追踪:对公共卫生实践的益处和障碍。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 16;21(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06052-4.
4
Determinants of Dutch public health professionals' intention to use digital contact tracing support tools: A cross-sectional online questionnaire study.荷兰公共卫生专业人员使用数字接触者追踪支持工具意向的影响因素:一项横断面在线问卷调查研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 14;3(2):e0000425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000425. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Fantastic perspectives and where to find them: involving patients and citizens in digital health research.奇妙的前景以及如何找到它们:让患者和公众参与数字健康研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Aug 2;8(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00374-6.
6
Investigating Citizens' Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy.调查公民对接种追踪应用程序的接受程度:信任和隐私作用的定量研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 18;12:e48700. doi: 10.2196/48700.
7
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
8
Factors Contributing to Citizens' Participation in COVID-19 Prevention and Control in China: An Integrated Model Based on Theory of Planned Behavior, Norm Activation Model, and Political Opportunity Structure Theory.中国公民参与新冠肺炎疫情防控的影响因素:基于计划行为理论、规范激活模型和政治机会结构理论的综合模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 27;19(23):15794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315794.
9
Digital Contact Tracing Apps for COVID-19: Development of a Citizen-Centered Evaluation Framework.数字接触者追踪应用程序用于 COVID-19:以公民为中心的评估框架的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 11;10(3):e30691. doi: 10.2196/30691.
10
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of Citizens' Intention to Participate in Self-Led Contact Tracing: Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Study.公民参与自我主导接触者追踪意愿的决定因素:横断面在线问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 30;10:e56943. doi: 10.2196/56943.
2
Determinants of Dutch public health professionals' intention to use digital contact tracing support tools: A cross-sectional online questionnaire study.荷兰公共卫生专业人员使用数字接触者追踪支持工具意向的影响因素:一项横断面在线问卷调查研究。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Feb 14;3(2):e0000425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000425. eCollection 2024 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention.是什么促使人们安装新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序?了解应用程序设计和个体差异对接触者追踪应用程序采用意愿的影响。
Pervasive Mob Comput. 2021 Aug;75:101439. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.101439. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
Beyond contact-tracing: The public value of eHealth application in a pandemic.超越接触者追踪:疫情期间电子健康应用程序的公共价值。
Gov Inf Q. 2021 Jul;38(3):101581. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101581. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
3
Dutch public health professionals' perspectives and needs regarding citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing through digital support tools: an exploratory qualitative study.
荷兰公共卫生专业人员对通过数字支持工具让公民参与新冠病毒接触者追踪的看法和需求:一项探索性定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):1378. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08764-y.
4
Treatment and Partner Notification Outcomes for Clients Diagnosed With Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Through GetCheckedOnline Compared With Sexually Transmitted Infection Clinics in British Columbia, Canada.与加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省性传播感染诊所相比,通过在线检查平台确诊衣原体和淋病的患者的治疗及性伴通知结果
Sex Transm Dis. 2023 Feb 1;50(2):86-91. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001735. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
5
Effectiveness, Policy, and User Acceptance of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps in the Post-COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Experience and Comparative Study.新冠疫情后时代的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的效果、政策和用户接受度:经验与比较研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Oct 27;8(10):e40233. doi: 10.2196/40233.
6
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.《柳叶刀》新冠疫情对未来的启示委员会
Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1224-1280. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
7
An Evaluation of Digital Partner Notification Tool Engagement and Impact for Patients Diagnosed With Gonorrhea and Syphilis.淋病和梅毒患者的数字伴侣通知工具使用情况及其影响评估。
Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Dec 1;49(12):815-821. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001707. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
8
Widening or narrowing inequalities? The equity implications of digital tools to support COVID-19 contact tracing: A qualitative study.扩大还是缩小不平等?支持 COVID-19 接触者追踪的数字工具的公平影响:一项定性研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2851-2861. doi: 10.1111/hex.13593. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
9
Effectiveness of contact tracing in the control of infectious diseases: a systematic review.接触者追踪在传染病控制中的效果:系统评价。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e259-e273. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00001-9. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
10
Including the Public in Public eHealth: The Need for Community Participation in the Development of State-Sponsored COVID-19-Related Mobile Apps.将公众纳入公共电子健康领域:在国家资助的 COVID-19 相关移动应用程序的开发中需要社区参与。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 9;10(3):e30872. doi: 10.2196/30872.