Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2023;85(2):123-134. doi: 10.3233/CH-231694.
Many Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) category 3-4 nodules are benign. Our study aimed to add virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI) to TI-RADS using two methods, namely conservative and aggressive, and to explore which method had better diagnostic performance and which method avoided more unnecessary biopsies.
From January 2016 to December 2021, we included 121 thyroid nodules classified as TI-RADS category 3-4 in 115 consecutive patients in this retrospective study. This study used the reference standard for pathological diagnosis by surgical resection or biopsy. The diagnostic performance of the different methods was evaluated and compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the ROC curve (AUC).
In this study, the aggressive approach had the best diagnostic performance among TI-RADS alone, the conservative approach, and the aggressive approach (AUC: 0.863 versus 0.598, P = 0.0007; 0.863 versus 0.755, P = 0.0067). When we used an aggressive approach, 75.44% (43/57) of the 57 false-positive nodes diagnosed by TI-RADS were appropriately downgraded from TI-RADS category 4 to category 3, avoiding unnecessary biopsies.
VTI improves the diagnostic performance of TI-RADS. The aggressive approach of combining the TI-RADS with VTI would help reduce unnecessary biopsies.
许多甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)类别 3-4 结节为良性。本研究旨在通过保守和积极两种方法将虚拟触诊组织成像(VTI)添加到 TI-RADS 中,并探讨哪种方法具有更好的诊断性能,以及哪种方法能避免更多不必要的活检。
本回顾性研究纳入了 115 例连续患者共 121 个 TI-RADS 类别 3-4 的甲状腺结节。本研究采用手术切除或活检的病理诊断作为参考标准。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)评估和比较不同方法的诊断性能。
在本研究中,与单独使用 TI-RADS、保守方法相比,积极方法的诊断性能最佳(AUC:0.863 比 0.598,P=0.0007;0.863 比 0.755,P=0.0067)。当我们使用积极方法时,TI-RADS 诊断的 57 个假阳性结节中有 75.44%(43/57)被适当从 TI-RADS 类别 4 降级为类别 3,避免了不必要的活检。
VTI 提高了 TI-RADS 的诊断性能。TI-RADS 联合 VTI 的积极方法有助于减少不必要的活检。