Yang Yuan-Po, Lin Tsung-Hsien, Chou Chen-Ying, Lee Cheng-Liang, Huang Hung-Kai, Wu Xian-Nin, Chen Ching-Pei
Department of Cardiology, Changhua Christian Hospital.
PhD Program in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, National Chung-Hsing University and National Health Research Institutes, Taichung.
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2023 Sep;39(5):765-772. doi: 10.6515/ACS.202309_39(5).20230115A.
Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) often exhibit long, diffuse, totally occluded and heavily calcified infrapopliteal (IP) lesions. This study evaluated limb salvage after peripheral excimer laser atherectomy (PELA) plus low-pressure balloon inflation (LPBI) without stent deployment in CLTI patients with severe IP disease.
We retrospectively evaluated 70 consecutive patients with 109 IP vessels who underwent PELA plus LPBI from 2010 to 2013. Technical success was defined as at least one IP straight-line flow being achieved below the malleolus. Binary logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with 6-month limb salvage.
Of the 109 IP vessels, 100 (91.7%) were totally occluded, and none of the patients received a stent. Of the 70 patients, 20% were octogenarians, and 85.8% had a Rutherford-Becker class 5 and 6. The technical success rate was 87.1% and 6-month limb salvage rate was 78.6%. Rutherford score was negatively correlated with clinical success (adjusted odds ratio 0.24; p = 0.028). No immediate major cardiovascular events were recorded during admission.
PELA plus LPBI may be a treatment option for complex IP lesions in patients with CLTI. Higher Rutherford class was correlated with a lower 6-month limb salvage rate. However, a large-scale study with a control group is needed to clarify our results.
慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者常表现为腘下(IP)病变长、弥漫、完全闭塞且严重钙化。本研究评估了在患有严重IP疾病的CLTI患者中,外周准分子激光斑块旋切术(PELA)加低压球囊扩张术(LPBI)且不植入支架后的肢体挽救情况。
我们回顾性评估了2010年至2013年期间连续接受PELA加LPBI治疗的70例患者的109条IP血管。技术成功定义为在内踝以下至少实现一条IP直线血流。进行二元逻辑回归以确定与6个月肢体挽救相关的因素。
在109条IP血管中,100条(91.7%)完全闭塞,且所有患者均未接受支架植入。70例患者中,20%为八旬老人,85.8%的患者Rutherford-Becker分级为5级和6级。技术成功率为87.1%,6个月肢体挽救率为78.6%。Rutherford评分与临床成功呈负相关(调整后的优势比为0.24;p = 0.028)。住院期间未记录到即刻重大心血管事件。
PELA加LPBI可能是CLTI患者复杂IP病变的一种治疗选择。较高的Rutherford分级与较低的6个月肢体挽救率相关。然而,需要开展有对照组的大规模研究来明确我们的结果。