Department of Emergency Medicine, Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, and The Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese Ministry of Health, and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Emergency Medicine Center, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China; Research Unit of Island Emergency Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (No 2019RU013), Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China; Key Laboratory of Emergency and Trauma, Ministry of Education, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Dec;8(12):e923-e932. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00173-1. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is an important global public health issue, but its epidemiology and outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries remain largely unknown. We aim to comprehensively describe the incidence, process of care, and outcomes of OHCA in China.
In the prospective, multicentre, population-based Baseline Investigation of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (BASIC-OHCA) registry study, participating sites were selected from both urban and rural areas in all seven geographical regions across China. All patients with OHCA assessed by emergency medical service (EMS) staff were consecutively enrolled from Aug 1, 2019, to Dec 31, 2020. Patients with suspected cardiac arrest assessed by bystanders whose return of spontaneous circulation was achieved without the need for defibrillation or EMS personnel cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. Patients with all key variables missing were excluded, including resuscitation attempt, age, sex, witnessed status, cause, all process of care indicators, and all outcome measures. In this analysis, we included data for EMS agencies serving 25 monitoring sites (20 urban and five rural) that included the entire serving population, data for the whole of 2020, and at least 50 OHCA patients in 2020. Data were collected and reported using the Utstein template. We calculated the crude incidence of EMS-assessed OHCA in 2020. We also report data on baseline characteristics (including sex, cause, location of OHCA, and presence of shockable rhythm), process of care (including EMS response time, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, and advanced life support), and outcomes of non-traumatic OHCA between Aug 1, 2019, and Dec 31, 2020, including survival and survival with favourable neurological outcomes at discharge or 30 days, and at 6 and 12 months.
Of 115·1 million people served by the 25 participating sites, 132 262 EMS-assessed patients with OHCA were enrolled, and resuscitation was attempted for 42 054 (31·8%) patients between Aug 1, 2019, and Dec 31, 2020. The crude incidence of EMS-assessed OHCA was 95·7 per 100 000 population (95% CI 95·6-95·8) in 2020. Among 38 227 individuals with non-traumatic OHCA, 25 958 (67·9%) were male, 30 282 (79·2%) had a cardiac arrest at home, 32 523 (85·1%) had a presumed cardiac cause, and 2297 (6·0%) presented with an initial shockable rhythm. 4049 (11·5%) of 35 090 patients with an unwitnessed or bystander-witnessed OHCA received dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 7121 (20·3%) received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation; only 14 (<0·1%) patients were assessed by bystanders with an automated external defibrillator. The median EMS response time was 12 min (IQR 9-16). At hospital discharge or 30 days, 441 (1·2%) of 38 227 survived, 304 (0·8%) survived up to 6 months, and 269 (0·7%) up to 12 months. At hospital discharge or 30 days, 309 (0·8%) survived with favourable neurological outcomes, 257 (0·7%) had favourable neurological outcomes at 6 months, and 236 (0·6%) at 12 months.
Our findings revealed a high burden of EMS-assessed OHCA with a low proportion of resuscitation attempts. The suboptimal implementation of chain of survival and unsatisfactory prognosis call for national efforts to improve the care and outcomes of patients with OHCA in China.
The National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China, the State Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Taishan Pandeng Scholar Program of Shandong Province, the Key Research & Development Program of Shandong Province, the Interdisciplinary Young Researcher Groups Program of Shandong University, the Clinical Research Center of Shandong University, the ECCM Program of Clinical Research Center of Shandong University, and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province.
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)是一个重要的全球公共卫生问题,但在低收入和中等收入国家,其流行病学和结局在很大程度上仍不清楚。我们旨在全面描述中国 OHCA 的发生率、救治过程和结局。
在前瞻性、多中心、基于人群的院外心脏骤停基础调查(BASIC-OHCA)登记研究中,从中国七个地理区域的城市和农村地区选择参与地点。所有由急救医疗服务(EMS)人员评估的 OHCA 患者均连续纳入,时间为 2019 年 8 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。由旁观者评估的疑似心脏骤停患者,且旁观者目击患者发生心搏骤停,旁观者未进行除颤或 EMS 人员心肺复苏,这些患者被排除在外。如果患者的所有关键变量缺失,包括复苏尝试、年龄、性别、目击者状态、病因、所有救治过程指标和所有结局测量,患者也将被排除。在本分析中,我们纳入了服务于 25 个监测站点(20 个城市和 5 个农村)的 EMS 机构的数据,这些站点覆盖了整个服务人群,包括 2020 年全年的数据,以及 2020 年至少 50 例 OHCA 患者的数据。使用 Utstein 模板收集和报告数据。我们计算了 2020 年 EMS 评估的 OHCA 的粗发生率。我们还报告了基线特征(包括性别、病因、OHCA 发生地点和休克节律存在情况)、救治过程(包括 EMS 反应时间、心肺复苏、除颤和高级生命支持)和非创伤性 OHCA 结局的数据,包括出院或 30 天时的存活和良好神经结局、6 个月和 12 个月时的存活和良好神经结局。
在参与的 25 个地点服务的 1.151 亿人中,有 132262 例经 EMS 评估的 OHCA 患者被纳入,在 2019 年 8 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间,有 42054 例(31.8%)患者接受了复苏尝试。2020 年 EMS 评估的 OHCA 粗发生率为 95.7/10 万(95%CI 95.6-95.8)。在 38227 例非创伤性 OHCA 患者中,25958 例(67.9%)为男性,30282 例(79.2%)发生在家庭,32523 例(85.1%)被认为是心脏原因引起的,2297 例(6.0%)初始时出现可除颤节律。4049 例(11.5%)无目击者或目击者见证的 OHCA 患者接受了调度员协助的心肺复苏,7121 例(20.3%)接受了旁观者心肺复苏;只有 14 例(<0.1%)患者由旁观者使用自动体外除颤器进行评估。EMS 反应时间中位数为 12 分钟(IQR 9-16)。出院或 30 天时,38227 例患者中有 441 例(1.2%)存活,304 例(0.8%)存活至 6 个月,269 例(0.7%)存活至 12 个月。出院或 30 天时,309 例(0.8%)存活且神经功能良好,257 例(0.7%)在 6 个月时神经功能良好,236 例(0.6%)在 12 个月时神经功能良好。
我们的研究结果显示,OHCA 的发生率很高,但复苏尝试的比例很低。生存链的实施情况不理想,预后不理想,这呼吁国家努力改善中国 OHCA 患者的救治和结局。
国家科技基础资源调查专项、国家自然科学基金重点项目、山东省泰山学者攀登计划、山东省重点研发计划、山东大学交叉学科青年研究团队计划、山东大学临床研究中心、山东大学临床研究中心 ECCM 计划和山东省自然科学基金。