Kishihara Yuki, Amagasa Shunsuke, Yasuda Hideto, Kashiura Masahiro, Shinzato Yutaro, Moriya Takashi
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, 1-847 Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama-shi, Saitama, Japan.
Department of Emergency and Transport Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, 2-10-1 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Resusc Plus. 2025 Apr 15;23:100957. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100957. eCollection 2025 May.
We aimed to investigate the appropriate timing for advanced airway management (AAM) in witnessed adult non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) by adjusting for resuscitation time bias and limiting the analysis to witnessed OHCA.
This retrospective observational study used a multicentre OHCA registry involving 99 participating hospitals in Japan and included adult patients with witnessed non-traumatic OHCA who underwent AAM during resuscitation. The primary and secondary outcomes were favourable 30-day neurological outcomes and survival, respectively. The time from emergency medical service contact to AAM was categorised as follows: 1-5, 6-10, 11-15, 16-20, 21-25, and 26-30 min. In each group, we calculated the time-dependent propensity score using a Fine-Gray regression model. After propensity score matching, we used a generalised estimating equation (GEE).
A total of 16,448 patients who underwent AAM were matched with patients at risk of requiring AAM. AAM was associated with favourable 30-day neurological outcomes when performed at 6-10 and 16-20 min with RRs (95% CIs) of 1.41 (1.12-1.78), but not at 16-20 min (0.74 [0.56-0.99]), respectively. AAM was associated with improved 30-day survival at 1-5 and 6-10 min (1.22 [1.05-1.41], 1.33 [1.16-1.54], respectively), but not at 16-20 min (0.78 [0.62-0.97].
Performing AAM within 10 min was associated with improved outcomes compared with those at risk of receiving AAM. However, the results were not consistent across all groups, therefore, careful interpretation is required.
通过调整复苏时间偏差并将分析局限于目击的院外心脏骤停(OHCA),我们旨在研究成年目击非创伤性院外心脏骤停患者进行高级气道管理(AAM)的合适时机。
这项回顾性观察研究使用了一个多中心OHCA登记系统,该系统涉及日本的99家参与医院,纳入了在复苏过程中接受AAM的成年目击非创伤性OHCA患者。主要和次要结局分别为30天良好神经功能结局和存活。从紧急医疗服务接触到AAM的时间分为以下几类:1 - 5分钟、6 - 10分钟、11 - 15分钟、16 - 20分钟、21 - 25分钟和26 - 30分钟。在每组中,我们使用Fine - Gray回归模型计算时间依赖性倾向评分。倾向评分匹配后,我们使用广义估计方程(GEE)。
共有16448例接受AAM的患者与有接受AAM风险的患者进行了匹配。在6 - 10分钟和16 - 20分钟进行AAM时,与30天良好神经功能结局相关,风险比(RRs)(95%置信区间)分别为1.41(1.12 - 1.78),但在16 - 20分钟时不相关(0.74 [0.56 - 0.99])。在1 - 5分钟和6 - 10分钟进行AAM与30天存活率提高相关(分别为1.22 [1.05 - 1.41],1.33 [1.16 - 1.54]),但在16 - 20分钟时不相关(0.78 [0.62 - 0.97])。
与有接受AAM风险的患者相比,在10分钟内进行AAM与更好的结局相关。然而,结果在所有组中并不一致,因此,需要谨慎解读。