方法学质量、偏倚风险和报告质量：混淆依然存在。 - Suppr

Methodological quality, risk of bias, and reporting quality: A confusion persists.

作者信息

Faggion Clovis Mariano

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology and Operative Dentistry, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

J Evid Based Med. 2023 Sep;16(3):261-263. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12550. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1111/jebm.12550

PMID:37725482

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Methodological quality, risk of bias, and reporting quality: A confusion persists.方法学质量、偏倚风险和报告质量：混淆依然存在。

J Evid Based Med. 2023 Sep;16(3):261-263. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12550. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.摘要分析方法有助于筛选银屑病干预措施中方法学质量低和偏倚风险高的系统评价。

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0460-z.

Assessing the methodological and reporting quality of network meta-analyses in Chinese medicine.评估中医网络荟萃分析的方法学和报告质量。

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(47):e13052. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013052.

Quality of Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Five Leading Neurology Journals in 2008 and 2013 Using the Modified "Risk of Bias" Tool.2008年和2013年使用改良版“偏倚风险”工具对五家顶尖神经病学期刊中随机对照试验报告质量的研究

World Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;99:687-694.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.136. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

The reporting quality and risk of bias of randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for migraine: Methodological study based on STRICTA and RoB 2.0.针刺治疗偏头痛的随机对照试验的报告质量和偏倚风险：基于 STRICTA 和 RoB 2.0 的方法学研究。

Complement Ther Med. 2020 Aug;52:102433. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102433. Epub 2020 Jun 10.

Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.基于膝关节骨关节炎的干细胞系统评价和荟萃分析的方法学质量和偏倚风险：横断面调查。

Stem Cells Dev. 2022 Aug;31(15-16):431-444. doi: 10.1089/scd.2022.0060. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.阿尔茨海默病患者护理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的报告和方法学质量：研究结果的普遍意义。

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

Reporting and Methodological Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.血管与血管内手术随机对照试验的报告及方法学质量

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Nov;50(5):664-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.06.114. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

The MethodologicAl STandards for Epidemiological Research (MASTER) scale demonstrated a unified framework for bias assessment.方法学标准在流行病学研究（MASTER）量表中表现出一个统一的偏倚评估框架。

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:52-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.012. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.使用 AMSTAR 和 ROBIS 评估正畸系统评价的方法学质量和偏倚风险。

Eur J Orthod. 2021 Oct 4;43(5):544-550. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaa074.

引用本文的文献

Guidelines for Reporting Oral Epidemiologic Studies to Inform Burden Estimation (GROESBE).用于告知负担估计的口腔流行病学研究报告指南（GROESBE）。

J Dent Res. 2025 Feb;104(2):140-146. doi: 10.1177/00220345241293410. Epub 2024 Dec 5.

Do authors of systematic reviews of epidemiological observational studies assess the methodologies of the included primary studies? An empirical examination of methodological tool use in the literature.系统评价流行病学观察性研究的作者是否评估纳入的原始研究方法？文献中方法学工具使用的实证检验。

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02349-5.

Reporting quality and risk of bias of randomized controlled trials of Chinese herbal medicine for multiple sclerosis.中文草药治疗多发性硬化症的随机对照试验的报告质量和偏倚风险。

Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 19;15:1429895. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1429895. eCollection 2024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

Methodological quality, risk of bias, and reporting quality: A confusion persists.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

文档翻译

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献