Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, China.
Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 19;15:1429895. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1429895. eCollection 2024.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common non-traumatic disabling disease affecting young adults. A definitive curative treatment is currently unavailable. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported the efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) on MS. Because of the uncertain quality of these RCTs, the recommendations for routine use of CHM for MS remain inconclusive. The comprehensive evaluation of the quality of RCTs of CHM for MS is urgent.
Nine databases, namely, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Sinomed, Wanfang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP Database, were searched from inception to September 2023. RCTs comparing CHM with placebo or pharmacological interventions for MS were considered eligible. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and its extension for CHM formulas (CONSORT-CHM Formulas) checklists were used to evaluate the reporting quality of RCTs. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The selection criteria of high-frequency herbs for MS were those with cumulative frequency over 50% among the top-ranked herbs.
A total of 25 RCTs were included. In the included RCTs, 33% of the CONSORT items and 21% of the CONSORT-CHM Formulas items were reported. Eligibility title, sample size calculation, allocation concealment, randomized implementation, and blinded description in CONSORT core items were reported by less than 5% of trials. For the CONSORT-CHM Formulas, the source and authentication method of each CHM ingredient was particularly poorly reported. Most studies classified the risk of bias as "unclear" due to insufficient information. The top five most frequently used herbs were, in order, , , , , and . No serious adverse effect had been reported.
The low reporting of CONSORT items and the unclear risk of bias indicate the inadequate quality of RCTs in terms of reporting completeness and result validity. The CONSORT-CHM Formulas appropriately consider the unique characteristics of CHM, including principles, formulas, and Chinese medicinal substances. To improve the quality of RCTs on CHM for MS, researchers should adhere more closely to CONSORT-CHM Formulas guidelines and ensure comprehensive disclosure of all study design elements.
多发性硬化症(MS)是最常见的影响年轻人的非外伤性致残性疾病。目前尚无明确的根治性治疗方法。许多随机对照试验(RCT)报告了中药(CHM)对 MS 的疗效。由于这些 RCT 的质量不确定,CHM 常规治疗 MS 的建议仍不明确。因此,迫切需要对 CHM 治疗 MS 的 RCT 质量进行综合评估。
从建库至 2023 年 9 月,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、EBSCO、中国生物医学文献数据库(Sinomed)、万方数据库、中国知网(China National Knowledge Infrastructure,CNKI)和维普数据库 9 个数据库,纳入比较 CHM 与安慰剂或药物干预治疗 MS 的 RCT。采用 CONSORT 及其中药方剂(CONSORT-CHM Formulas)扩展清单评估 RCT 的报告质量,采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。选择 MS 高频中药的标准是累积频率在排名前几位的中药中超过 50%。
共纳入 25 项 RCT。纳入的 RCT 中,CONSORT 条目有 33%,CONSORT-CHM Formulas 条目有 21%得到报告。少于 5%的试验报告了 CONSORT 核心条目中的入选标准标题、样本量计算、分配隐藏、随机实施和盲法描述。对于 CONSORT-CHM Formulas,每个 CHM 成分的来源和验证方法尤其未得到充分报告。由于信息不足,大多数研究将偏倚风险归类为“不清楚”。使用频率最高的前 5 位中药依次为、、、、、。未报告严重不良事件。
CONSORT 条目的低报告率和偏倚风险的不明确表明,在报告完整性和结果有效性方面,RCT 的质量不足。CONSORT-CHM Formulas 适当考虑了中药的独特特征,包括原则、方剂和中药物质。为提高 CHM 治疗 MS 的 RCT 质量,研究人员应更严格地遵守 CONSORT-CHM Formulas 指南,并确保全面披露所有研究设计要素。