• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国开放式胰十二指肠切除术联合或不联合海德堡 TRIANGLE 手术治疗胰腺癌的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness of open pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without Heidelberg TRIANGLE operation for pancreatic cancer in China.

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, No. 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211166, China.

School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(18):16705-16715. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05406-6. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00432-023-05406-6
PMID:37726557
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer is a digestive malignancy with dismal prognosis. The advent of Heidelberg TRIANGLE dissection technique brings a turning point to improve the chance of survival. Our study aimed to evaluated the cost-effectiveness of open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) versus OPD combined with TRIANGLE operation (OPD-TRIANGLE) for patients with pancreatic cancer from the perspective of healthcare system in China.

METHODS

Two hundred forty-six patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent OPD or OPD-TRIANGLE from January to September 2022 were enrolled in this study. We performed a decision tree model to assess clinical and economic implications of different surgical strategies. Estimation of health utilities was based on published literature, while costs were acquired from the hospitals, clinical expert consultations, and other local charge. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was regarded as the primary outcome. Uncertainty of the findings was addressed via sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses.

RESULTS

The results indicated that OPD-TRIANGLE group yielded additional 0.0402 QALYs at an incremental cost of US$1501.83 compared with OPD group, and the corresponding ICER was US$37,358.96 per QALY. The probabilities of OPD-TRIANGLE as the prior option were 52.8% at the WTP threshold of 60,000 US$/QALY. The main factors lined with costs incorporating total medical costs and operation-related costs. With 5-20% price reduction of OPD-TRIANGLE, the outcomes were also economically attractive.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this population-based study suggested that OPD-TRIANGLE was likely to be cost-effective for patients with pancreatic cancer when compared against OPD. Further in-depth studies should be conducted to provide more comprehensive evidence.

摘要

目的

胰腺癌是一种预后极差的消化系统恶性肿瘤。海德堡 TRIANGLE 解剖技术的出现为提高生存机会带来了转机。我们的研究旨在从中国医疗保健系统的角度评估开放式胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)与 OPD 联合 TRIANGLE 手术(OPD-TRIANGLE)治疗胰腺癌患者的成本效益。

方法

本研究纳入了 2022 年 1 月至 9 月期间接受 OPD 或 OPD-TRIANGLE 手术的 246 例胰腺癌患者。我们使用决策树模型评估了不同手术策略的临床和经济影响。健康效用的估计基于已发表的文献,而成本则来自医院、临床专家咨询和其他当地收费。增量成本效益比(ICER)被视为主要结果。通过敏感性分析和情景分析来解决研究结果的不确定性。

结果

结果表明,与 OPD 组相比,OPD-TRIANGLE 组在增加 1501.83 美元的增量成本下获得了额外的 0.0402 个 QALY,相应的 ICER 为每 QALY 37358.96 美元。在 60000 美元/QALY 的 WTP 阈值下,OPD-TRIANGLE 作为首选方案的概率为 52.8%。主要因素与总成本和手术相关成本有关。如果 OPD-TRIANGLE 的价格降低 5-20%,其结果也具有经济吸引力。

结论

这项基于人群的研究结果表明,与 OPD 相比,OPD-TRIANGLE 可能对胰腺癌患者具有成本效益。需要进一步开展深入研究,以提供更全面的证据。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of open pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without Heidelberg TRIANGLE operation for pancreatic cancer in China.中国开放式胰十二指肠切除术联合或不联合海德堡 TRIANGLE 手术治疗胰腺癌的成本效果分析。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec;149(18):16705-16715. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05406-6. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
3
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model.心脏再同步治疗(双心室起搏)用于心力衰竭的临床疗效及成本效益:系统评价与经济学模型
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. doi: 10.3310/hta11470.
5
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging assessment after pancreaticoduodenectomy: reconstruction techniques-normal findings and complications.胰十二指肠切除术后的影像学评估:重建技术、正常表现及并发症
Insights Imaging. 2022 Oct 20;13(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01306-4.
2
Case-matched analysis of robotic versus open surgical enucleation for pancreatic tumours: A comparative cost-effectiveness study.机器人与开放式手术摘除法治疗胰腺肿瘤的病例匹配分析:一项比较成本效益的研究。
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Oct;18(5):e2425. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2425. Epub 2022 May 28.
3
TRIANGLE operation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in total pancreatectomy.
全胰切除术中对可切除边缘胰腺癌的TRIANGLE手术
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Oct;8(6):2416-2424. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.09.50.
4
Health technology assessment-informed pricing negotiation in China: higher negotiated price for more effective targeted anticancer medicines?中国基于卫生技术评估的定价谈判:更有效的靶向抗癌药物是否意味着更高的谈判价格?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jan 3;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00810-1.
5
The TRIANGLE operation for pancreatic head and body cancers: early postoperative outcomes.三角手术治疗胰头和胰体癌:术后早期结果。
HPB (Oxford). 2022 Mar;24(3):332-341. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.06.432. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
6
Mesopancreas Excision and Triangle Operation During Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy.机器人胰十二指肠切除术时的中肠系膜切除和三角操作。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8330-8334. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10412-4. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
7
Advancing on pancreatic cancer.攻克胰腺癌。
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;18(7):447. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00479-5.
8
Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in China: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020.全球及中国癌症负担的变化趋势:对《2020年全球癌症统计数据》的二次分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2021 Mar 17;134(7):783-791. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474.
9
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:多中心分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Mar 12;108(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa039.
10
Defining and Implementing Value-Based Health Care: A Strategic Framework.定义和实施基于价值的医疗保健:战略框架。
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):682-685. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003122.