National Clinician Scholars Program & Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 1100 Glendon Ave, Suite 900, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.
Healthcare Anchor Network, 2202 18th St. NW, Suite 317, Washington, DC, 20009, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):1824. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16761-x.
Healthcare-based interventions addressing social needs such as food and housing generally fail to impact the upstream wealth and power inequities underlying those needs. However, a small number of US healthcare organizations have begun addressing these upstream inequities by partnering with community wealth building initiatives. These initiatives include community land trusts, resident-owned communities, and worker cooperatives, which provide local residents ownership and control over their housing and workplaces. While these partnerships represent a novel, upstream approach to the social determinants of health, no research has yet evaluated them.
To assess the current state and key aspects of healthcare-community wealth building partnerships, we conducted a multiple case study analysis using semi-structured interviews with thirty-eight key informants across ten partnerships identified through the Healthcare Anchor Network. To analyze the interviews, we used a two-stage coding process. First, we coded responses based on the phase of the intervention to which they corresponded: motivation, initiation, implementation, or evaluation. Then we assessed responses within each aspect for common themes and variation on salient topics.
Partnerships were generally motivated by a combination of community needs, such as affordable housing and living wage jobs, and health system interests, such as workforce housing and supply chain resilience. Initiating projects required identifying external partners, educating leadership, and utilizing risk mitigation strategies to obtain health system buy-in. Implementation took various forms, with healthcare organizations providing financial capital in the form of grants and loans, social capital in the form of convening funders and other stakeholders, and/or capacity building support in the form of strategic planning or technical assistance resources. To evaluate projects, healthcare organizations used more process and community-level metrics rather than metrics based on individual health outcomes or returns on investment. Based on best practices from each partnership phase, we provide a roadmap for healthcare organizations to develop effective community wealth building partnerships.
Assessing healthcare partnerships with community wealth building organizations yields key strategies healthcare organizations can use to develop more effective partnerships to address the upstream causes of poor health.
以医疗为基础的干预措施,旨在解决食物和住房等社会需求,但这些措施往往无法改变导致这些需求的上游财富和权力不平等问题。然而,少数美国医疗机构已经开始通过与社区财富建设计划合作来解决这些上游不平等问题。这些计划包括社区土地信托、居民拥有的社区和工人合作社,它们为当地居民提供了对住房和工作场所的所有权和控制权。虽然这些伙伴关系代表了一种解决健康社会决定因素的新的、上游方法,但目前还没有研究评估过它们。
为了评估医疗保健与社区财富建设伙伴关系的现状和关键方面,我们使用半结构化访谈对通过医疗保健锚定网络确定的十个合作伙伴关系中的 38 名关键信息提供者进行了多案例研究分析。为了分析访谈,我们使用了两阶段编码过程。首先,我们根据干预措施的阶段对回复进行编码:动机、启动、实施或评估。然后,我们在每个方面内评估回复,以确定共同主题和突出主题的变化。
伙伴关系通常是由社区需求(如负担得起的住房和有竞争力的工作)和医疗系统利益(如劳动力住房和供应链弹性)共同推动的。启动项目需要确定外部合作伙伴、教育领导层并利用风险缓解策略获得医疗系统的认可。实施形式多样,医疗保健组织提供赠款和贷款等形式的财务资本、召集资金和其他利益相关者的社会资本、以及战略规划或技术援助资源等形式的能力建设支持。为了评估项目,医疗保健组织使用了更多基于过程和社区层面的指标,而不是基于个人健康结果或投资回报率的指标。根据每个伙伴关系阶段的最佳实践,我们为医疗保健组织提供了一份路线图,以制定有效的社区财富建设伙伴关系。
评估医疗保健与社区财富建设组织的伙伴关系,可以为医疗保健组织提供关键策略,以制定更有效的伙伴关系,解决导致健康状况不佳的上游原因。