Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09649-4.
Affordability and accessibility of hospital care are under pressure. Research on hospital care financing focuses primarily on incentives in the financial system outside the hospital. It is notable that little is known about (incentives in) internal funding in hospitals. Therefore, our study focuses on the budget allocation in hospitals: the distribution model. Based on our hypothesis that the reimbursement and distribution models in hospitals might interact, we gain knowledge about-, and insight into, the interaction of different reimbursement and distribution models used in Dutch hospitals, and how they affect the financial output of hospital care.
An online survey with 22 questions was conducted among financial senior management as an expert group in 49 Dutch hospitals.
Ultimately, 38 of 49 approached experts fully completed the survey, which amounts to 78% of the hospitals we approached and 60% of all Dutch hospitals. The results on the reimbursement model indicate price * volume with adjusted prices above a maximum cap as the most common dominant contract type. On the internal distribution model, 75-80% of the experts reported incremental budgeting as the dominant budgeting method. Results on the interaction between the reimbursement and the distribution model show that both general and specific changes in contract agreements are only partially incorporated in hospital budgets. In 28 out of 31 hospitals with self-employed medical specialists, a relation is reported between the reimbursement model and the contracts with the Medical Consultant Group(s) in which the medical specialists are united.
Our results in Dutch setting indicate a limited interaction between the reimbursement model and the distribution model. This lack of congruence between both models might limit the desired effects of incentives in contractual agreements aimed at the financial output. This applies to different reimbursement and distribution models. Further research into the various interactions and incentives, as visualized in our conceptual framework, could result in evidence-based advice for achieving affordable and accessible hospital care.
医院医疗的可负担性和可及性面临压力。医院医疗融资的研究主要集中在医院外部金融系统中的激励措施上。值得注意的是,人们对医院内部资金(激励措施)知之甚少。因此,我们的研究侧重于医院的预算分配:分配模式。基于我们的假设,即医院的报销和分配模式可能会相互作用,我们获得了关于荷兰医院使用的不同报销和分配模式的相互作用以及它们如何影响医院医疗的财务产出的知识和见解。
我们在 49 家荷兰医院的财务高级管理人员中进行了一项有 22 个问题的在线调查,作为专家组。
最终,在我们联系的 49 家专家中,有 38 家完全完成了调查,占我们联系的医院的 78%,占荷兰所有医院的 60%。关于报销模式的结果表明,按价格*数量计算,调整后的价格高于最高上限是最常见的主导合同类型。关于内部分配模式,75-80%的专家报告增量预算是主导的预算编制方法。关于报销和分配模式之间相互作用的结果表明,合同协议的一般和具体变化仅部分纳入医院预算。在 31 家有自营医疗专家的医院中,有 28 家报告称,报销模式与联合医疗顾问组(s)的合同之间存在关系,其中包括医疗专家。
我们在荷兰的研究结果表明,报销模式和分配模式之间的相互作用有限。这两种模式之间缺乏一致性可能会限制旨在影响财务产出的合同协议中激励措施的预期效果。这适用于不同的报销和分配模式。进一步研究我们概念框架中可视化的各种相互作用和激励措施,可以为实现负担得起和可及的医院医疗提供基于证据的建议。