• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎感染与注射吸毒人群药物相关住院之间的短暂正相关:全国数据的自我对照病例系列分析。

A transient positive association between direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C infection and drug-related hospitalization among people who inject drugs: Self-controlled case-series analysis of national data.

机构信息

School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Addiction. 2024 Feb;119(2):369-378. doi: 10.1111/add.16344. Epub 2023 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1111/add.16344
PMID:37726951
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment has an established positive effect on liver outcomes in people with hepatitis C infection; however, there is insufficient evidence regarding its effects on the 'extra-hepatic' outcomes of drug-related hospitalization and mortality (DRM) among people who inject drugs (PWID). We investigated associations between these outcomes and DAA treatment by comparing post-treatment to baseline periods using a within-subjects design to minimize selection bias concerns with cohort or case-control designs.

DESIGN

This was a self-controlled case-series study.

SETTING

Scotland, 1 January 2015-30 November 2020.

PARTICIPANTS

The study population of non-cirrhotic, DAA-treated PWID was identified using a data set linking Scotland's hepatitis C diagnosis, HCV clinical databases, national inpatient/day-case hospital records and the national deaths register. Three principal outcomes (drug overdose admission, non-viral injecting related admission and drug-related mortality) were defined using ICD codes.

MEASUREMENTS

Self-controlled case-series methodology was used to estimate the relative incidence (RI) of each outcome associated with time on treatment and up to six 90-day exposure risk periods thereafter.

FINDINGS

A total of 6050 PWID were treated with DAAs in the sampling time-frame. Compared with the baseline period, there was a significantly lowered risk of a drug overdose hospital admission in the second to fifth exposure risk periods only [relative incidence (RI) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-0.99; 0.89, 95% CI = 0.80-0.99; 0.86, 95% CI = 0.77-0.96; 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78-0.99, respectively]. For non-viral injecting-related admission, there was a reduced risk in the first, third and fourth exposure risk periods (RI = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.64-0.90; 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62-0.90; 0.79, 95% CI = 0.66-0.96, respectively). There was no evidence for reduced DRM risk in any period following treatment end.

CONCLUSIONS

Among people who inject drugs in Scotland, direct-acting antiviral treatment appears to be associated with a small, non-durable reduction in the risk of drug-related hospital admission, but not drug-related mortality. Direct-acting antiviral therapy, despite high effectiveness against liver disease, does not appear to offer a panacea for reducing other drug-related health harms.

摘要

背景和目的

直接作用抗病毒 (DAA) 治疗对丙型肝炎感染患者的肝脏结局具有明确的积极影响;然而,在注射毒品者(PWID)中,关于药物相关住院和死亡率(DRM)的“肝外”结局的证据不足。我们通过使用个体内设计来比较治疗后的时期与基线时期,以最小化队列或病例对照设计中选择偏差的问题,研究了这些结局与 DAA 治疗之间的关联。

设计

这是一项自身对照病例系列研究。

地点

苏格兰,2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 11 月 30 日。

参与者

使用一个链接苏格兰丙型肝炎诊断、HCV 临床数据库、全国住院/日间病例医院记录和国家死亡登记处的数据集,确定非肝硬化、接受 DAA 治疗的 PWID 研究人群。使用 ICD 代码定义了三个主要结局(药物过量入院、非病毒性注射相关入院和药物相关死亡)。

测量

使用自身对照病例系列方法估计与治疗时间相关的每个结局的相对发病率(RI)以及之后最多六个 90 天暴露风险期。

结果

在采样时间范围内,共有 6050 名 PWID 接受了 DAA 治疗。与基线期相比,仅在第二至第五个暴露风险期,药物过量入院的风险显著降低(相对发病率(RI)=0.86,95%置信区间(CI)=0.80-0.99;0.89,95%CI=0.80-0.99;0.86,95%CI=0.77-0.96;0.88,95%CI=0.78-0.99,分别)。对于非病毒性注射相关入院,在第一个、第三个和第四个暴露风险期风险降低(RI=0.76,95%CI=0.64-0.90;0.75,95%CI=0.62-0.90;0.79,95%CI=0.66-0.96,分别)。在治疗结束后的任何时期,都没有证据表明 DRM 风险降低。

结论

在苏格兰注射毒品者中,直接作用抗病毒治疗似乎与药物相关住院风险的小而不持久的降低相关,但与药物相关死亡率无关。尽管对肝脏疾病具有高度有效性,但直接作用抗病毒疗法似乎并不能提供解决其他药物相关健康危害的万能药。

相似文献

1
A transient positive association between direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C infection and drug-related hospitalization among people who inject drugs: Self-controlled case-series analysis of national data.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗丙型肝炎感染与注射吸毒人群药物相关住院之间的短暂正相关:全国数据的自我对照病例系列分析。
Addiction. 2024 Feb;119(2):369-378. doi: 10.1111/add.16344. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
2
Incidence of primary hepatitis C virus infection among people who inject drugs in Australia pre- and post-unrestricted availability of direct acting antiviral therapies.在澳大利亚,直接作用抗病毒疗法可无限制获取之前和之后,注射吸毒者中丙型肝炎病毒原发性感染的发生率。
Addiction. 2023 May;118(5):901-911. doi: 10.1111/add.16113. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Reduction in the population prevalence of hepatitis C virus viraemia among people who inject drugs associated with scale-up of direct-acting anti-viral therapy in community drug services: real-world data.在社区药物服务中扩大直接作用抗病毒治疗与注射吸毒者中丙型肝炎病毒病毒血症流行率降低相关:真实世界数据。
Addiction. 2021 Oct;116(10):2893-2907. doi: 10.1111/add.15459. Epub 2021 May 5.
4
Improved health-related quality of life after hepatitis C viraemic clearance among people who inject drugs may not be durable.在注射毒品人群中,丙型肝炎病毒血症清除后健康相关生活质量的改善可能不持久。
Addiction. 2023 Jul;118(7):1340-1350. doi: 10.1111/add.16169. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
5
Population-level estimates of hepatitis C reinfection post scale-up of direct-acting antivirals among people who inject drugs.人群水平估计丙型肝炎再感染直接作用抗病毒药物扩大应用于注射毒品人群后
J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):549-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.038. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
6
Declining prevalence of current HCV infection and increased treatment uptake among people who inject drugs: The ETHOS Engage study.当前丙型肝炎病毒感染率下降,以及注射吸毒者治疗参与度增加:ETHOS Engage 研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 Jul;105:103706. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103706. Epub 2022 May 6.
7
Gaps in hepatitis C virus prevention and care for HIV-hepatitis C virus co-infected people who inject drugs in Canada.加拿大注射毒品的艾滋病毒-丙型肝炎病毒合并感染者在丙型肝炎病毒预防和护理方面存在的差距。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 May;103:103627. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103627. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
8
Evaluating the population impact of hepatitis C direct acting antiviral treatment as prevention for people who inject drugs (EPIToPe) - a natural experiment (protocol).评估丙型肝炎直接抗病毒治疗作为对注射毒品者的预防措施所产生的人群影响(EPIToPe)——一项自然实验(方案)
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):e029538. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029538.
9
Comparison of the Efficacies of Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment for HCV Infection in People Who Inject Drugs and Non-Drug Users.比较直接作用抗病毒药物治疗在吸毒者和非吸毒者中 HCV 感染的疗效。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Mar 17;58(3):436. doi: 10.3390/medicina58030436.
10
Determinants of hepatitis C antiviral effectiveness awareness among people who inject drugs in the direct-acting antiviral era.直接作用抗病毒药物时代,影响注射吸毒人群对丙型肝炎抗病毒疗效认知的因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Feb;52:115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.12.014.