• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[预防性热腹腔内化疗对老年局部晚期胃癌患者的安全性和有效性:倾向评分匹配分析]

[The safety and efficacy of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].

作者信息

Yu T, Ma F H, An Q, Cao X L, Xiao G, Wu G J

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 26;103(36):2867-2873. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230319-00435.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230319-00435
PMID:37726993
Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on elderly patients diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer based on a propensity score matching analysis. Clinical data of elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy in Beijing Hospital from January 2017 to December 2021 were retrospectively collected. According to whether HIPEC was used, the patients were divided into HIPEC group (radical gastrectomy combined with HIPEC) and control group (radical gastrectomy alone), and 29 patients in HIPEC group and 122 patients in control group. After 1∶1 matching of PSM, there were 28 patients in each group. The clinicopathological data, surgical data, postoperative recovery and long-term survival of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Before PSM, the mean age in the HIPEC group was (70.7±4.0) years, and in the control group was (73.1±5.8) years (=0.011). After PSM, the mean age in the HIPEC group was (70.9±3.9) years, and it was (71.8±5.4) years in the control group (=0.739). Before PSM, the incidence of postoperative complications was 20.7% (6 cases) in the HIPEC group and 26.2% (32 cases) in the control group (=0.639). After PSM, the incidence of postoperative complications was 21.4% (6 cases) in the HIPEC group and 14.3% (4 cases) in the control group (=0.730). Before PSM, the mean duration of hospitalization after radical gastrectomy was (13.6±7.6) days in HIPEC group and (16.2±13.0) days in control group, respectively (=0.312). After PSM, the mean duration of hospitalization after radical gastrectomy was (13.7±7.8) days in HIPEC group and (15.4±9.7) days in control group, respectively (=0.479). Before PSM, the 1-and 3-year overall survival rates of the HIPEC group were 88.2% and 69.7%, and 88.0% and 66.1% for control group, respectively, with no statistical difference between the two groups in overall survival (=0.499). After PSM, the 1-and 3-year overall survival rates of the HIPEC group were 86.8% and 69.7%, and 93.1% and 67.5% for control group, respectively, with no statistical difference between the two groups in overall survival (=0.425). Before PSM, the 1-and 3-year disease-free survival rates of the HIPEC group were 88.2% and 67.1%, and 87.8% and 64.3% for control group, respectively, with no statistical difference between the two groups in disease-free survival (=0.863). After PSM, the 1-and 3-year disease-free survival rates of the HIPEC group were 88.2% and 62.8%, and 93.7% and 64.7% for control group, respectively, with no statistical difference between the two groups in disease-free survival (=0.804). Radical surgery combined with HIPEC for elderly patients with gastric cancer does not increase postoperative complications and postoperative recovery time. However, there was no significant difference in overall survival and disease-specific survival between the two groups.

摘要

基于倾向评分匹配分析,评估预防性腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)对诊断为局部晚期胃癌的老年患者的安全性和有效性。回顾性收集2017年1月至2021年12月在北京医院接受根治性胃切除术的老年局部晚期胃癌患者的临床资料。根据是否使用HIPEC,将患者分为HIPEC组(根治性胃切除术联合HIPEC)和对照组(单纯根治性胃切除术),HIPEC组29例,对照组122例。经PSM 1∶1匹配后,每组各有28例患者。比较并分析两组患者的临床病理资料、手术资料、术后恢复情况及长期生存情况。PSM前,HIPEC组的平均年龄为(70.7±4.0)岁,对照组为(73.1±5.8)岁(P = 0.011)。PSM后,HIPEC组的平均年龄为(70.9±3.9)岁,对照组为(71.8±5.4)岁(P = 0.739)。PSM前,HIPEC组术后并发症发生率为20.7%(6例),对照组为26.2%(32例)(P = 0.639)。PSM后,HIPEC组术后并发症发生率为21.4%(6例),对照组为14.3%(4例)(P = 0.730)。PSM前,HIPEC组根治性胃切除术后平均住院时间分别为(13.6±7.6)天,对照组为(16.2±13.0)天(P = 0.312)。PSM后,HIPEC组根治性胃切除术后平均住院时间分别为(13.7±7.8)天,对照组为(15.4±9.7)天(P = 0.479)。PSM前,HIPEC组1年和3年总生存率分别为88.2%和69.7%,对照组分别为88.0%和66.1%,两组总生存率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.499)。PSM后,HIPEC组1年和3年总生存率分别为86.8%和69.7%,对照组分别为93.1%和67.5%,两组总生存率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.425)。PSM前,HIPEC组1年和3年无病生存率分别为88.2%和67.1%,对照组分别为87.8%和64.3%,两组无病生存率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.863)。PSM后,HIPEC组1年和3年无病生存率分别为88.2%和62.8%,对照组分别为93.7%和64.7%,两组无病生存率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.804)。根治性手术联合HIPEC治疗老年胃癌患者不会增加术后并发症和术后恢复时间。然而,两组患者的总生存率和疾病特异性生存率无显著差异。

相似文献

1
[The safety and efficacy of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].[预防性热腹腔内化疗对老年局部晚期胃癌患者的安全性和有效性:倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 26;103(36):2867-2873. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20230319-00435.
2
Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with prophylactic intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with clinical T4 gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study based on propensity score matching.新辅助化疗联合预防性腹腔内热灌注化疗对接受腹腔镜根治性胃切除术的临床 T4 期胃癌患者的疗效:基于倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 11;22(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03526-y.
3
Prognostic Analysis of Prophylactic Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.进展期胃癌预防性腹腔内热化疗的预后分析:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Nov;27(11):2297-2307. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05823-5. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
4
[Safety evaluation of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with local advanced gastric cancer after radical resection for prevention of peritoneal metastasis].[局部进展期胃癌根治术后腹腔内热灌注化疗预防腹膜转移的安全性评估]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 25;25(1):48-55. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210514-00206.
5
Phase II trial of prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer after curative surgery.根治性手术后局部进展期胃癌患者预防性腹腔内热化疗的 II 期临床试验。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Mar 2;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07925-2.
6
Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with clinical T4 gastric cancer.临床 T4 期胃癌患者的预防性腹腔温热化疗。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Sep;48(9):1972-1979. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.018. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
[Safety of patients undergoing radical resection combined with paclitaxel-based hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer].[局部进展期胃癌行根治性切除联合紫杉醇腹腔热灌注化疗患者的安全性]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 25;27(5):471-477. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20240104-00006.
8
Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Radical Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis.局部进展期胃癌根治性手术联合或不联合腹腔热灌注化疗的疗效和安全性的对比研究:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(13):8551-8563. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12348-9. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
9
Morbidity following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastases with or without early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A propensity score matched study.细胞减灭术和腹腔内热灌注化疗治疗腹膜转移伴或不伴术后早期腹腔内化疗的术后发病率:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jul;48(7):1598-1605. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.02.004. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
10
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) plus systemic chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy alone in locally advanced gastric cancer after D2 radical resection: a randomized-controlled study.腹腔内热灌注化疗(HIPEC)联合全身化疗对比 D2 根治术后局部进展期胃癌单纯全身化疗的随机对照研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;149(13):11491-11498. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05019-z. Epub 2023 Jul 1.