• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西雅图足部评估

Evaluation of the Seattle Foot.

作者信息

Reswick J B

出版信息

J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986 Jul;23(3):77-94.

PMID:3772820
Abstract

Evaluation of the Seattle Foot was the first major evaluation project undertaken by the Rehabilitation Research and Development Evaluation Unit. As a joint project with the Prosthetic and Sensory Aids Service, it not only helped to launch an important new prosthetic foot concept but also set precedents for methods and procedures to evaluate promising prototype devices and to facilitate their commercialization. A great many people contributed to this project. Fred Downs and Edward Nowack organized the service delivery of the Seattle Foot through their 44 Prosthetic Clinics in VAMCs across the nation. The clinic chiefs and the prosthetic contractors gave freely of their time to ensure that evaluation data and comments were obtained and reported. Ernest Burgess and his Prosthetic Research Study staff developed evaluation protocols on which this evaluation was based. Finally, the 486 amputee veteran subjects made the evaluation a credible reality with their thoughtful responses.

摘要

西雅图足部假肢评估是康复研究与发展评估部门开展的首个重大评估项目。作为与假肢及感官辅助服务部门的联合项目,它不仅助力推出了一项重要的新型假肢足部概念,还为评估有前景的原型设备以及推动其商业化的方法和程序树立了先例。许多人参与了该项目。弗雷德·唐斯和爱德华·诺瓦克通过他们在全国各地退伍军人事务医疗中心的44家假肢诊所组织了西雅图足部假肢的服务提供。诊所主任和假肢承包商无偿贡献出他们的时间,以确保获取并报告评估数据及意见。欧内斯特·伯吉斯和他的假肢研究团队制定了本次评估所依据的评估方案。最后,486名截肢退伍军人受试者以他们深思熟虑的回答使评估成为了可信的现实。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Seattle Foot.西雅图足部评估
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986 Jul;23(3):77-94.
2
Report on the evaluation of the VA/Seattle below-knee prosthesis.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(2):260-6.
3
Mechanical efficiency during gait of adults with transtibial amputation: a pilot study comparing the SACH, Seattle, and Golden-Ankle prosthetic feet.经胫截肢成人步态中的机械效率:一项比较SACH、西雅图和金踝假肢脚的初步研究。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1998 Jun;35(2):177-85.
4
A comparative study of oxygen consumption for conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in transfemoral amputees.经股骨截肢患者使用传统假肢脚和储能假肢脚的耗氧量比较研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2008 Oct-Nov;22(10-11):896-901. doi: 10.1177/0269215508088990.
5
A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.高功能经股骨截肢者中传统假肢脚与储能假肢脚的对比研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jun;88(6):801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.028.
6
Energy storing property of so-called energy-storing prosthetic feet.所谓储能假肢脚的储能特性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jan;74(1):68-72.
7
Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.血管性和创伤性膝下截肢者行走时的能量消耗:五种假肢足部的比较
J Rehabil Res Dev. 1995 May;32(2):111-9.
8
Below-knee amputee gait in stair ambulation. A comparison of stride characteristics using five different prosthetic feet.膝下截肢者上楼梯时的步态。使用五种不同假肢脚的步幅特征比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jun(303):185-92.
9
Recent advances in research in prosthetics for children.儿童假肢研究的最新进展。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 May(148):26-33.
10
Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet.假肢足部的比较翻滚分析
J Biomech. 2009 Aug 7;42(11):1746-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 May 15.