• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国杭州新冠疫情后基于集成时间序列方法的高频儿科发热门诊就诊情况分析与预测:一项回顾性研究

Analyzing and Forecasting Pediatric Fever Clinic Visits in High Frequency Using Ensemble Time-Series Methods After the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hangzhou, China: Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Zhang Wang, Zhu Zhu, Zhao Yonggen, Li Zheming, Chen Lingdong, Huang Jian, Li Jing, Yu Gang

机构信息

Department of Data and Information, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Sino-Finland Joint AI Laboratory for Child Health of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Sep 20;11:e45846. doi: 10.2196/45846.

DOI:10.2196/45846
PMID:37728972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10551790/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly altered the global health and medical landscape. In response to the outbreak, Chinese hospitals have established 24-hour fever clinics to serve patients with COVID-19. The emergence of these clinics and the impact of successive epidemics have led to a surge in visits, placing pressure on hospital resource allocation and scheduling. Therefore, accurate prediction of outpatient visits is essential for informed decision-making in hospital management.

OBJECTIVE

Hourly visits to fever clinics can be characterized as a long-sequence time series in high frequency, which also exhibits distinct patterns due to the particularity of pediatric treatment behavior in an epidemic context. This study aimed to build models to forecast fever clinic visit with outstanding prediction accuracy and robust generalization in forecast horizons. In addition, this study hopes to provide a research paradigm for time-series forecasting problems, which involves an exploratory analysis revealing data patterns before model development.

METHODS

An exploratory analysis, including graphical analysis, autocorrelation analysis, and seasonal-trend decomposition, was conducted to reveal the seasonality and structural patterns of the retrospective fever clinic visit data. The data were found to exhibit multiseasonality and nonlinearity. On the basis of these results, an ensemble of time-series analysis methods, including individual models and their combinations, was validated on the data set. Root mean square error and mean absolute error were used as accuracy metrics, with the cross-validation of rolling forecasting origin conducted across different forecast horizons.

RESULTS

Hybrid models generally outperformed individual models across most forecast horizons. A novel model combination, the hybrid neural network autoregressive (NNAR)-seasonal and trend decomposition using Loess forecasting (STLF), was identified as the optimal model for our forecasting task, with the best performance in all accuracy metrics (root mean square error=20.1, mean absolute error=14.3) for the 15-days-ahead forecasts and an overall advantage for forecast horizons that were 1 to 30 days ahead.

CONCLUSIONS

Although forecast accuracy tends to decline with an increasing forecast horizon, the hybrid NNAR-STLF model is applicable for short-, medium-, and long-term forecasts owing to its ability to fit multiseasonality (captured by the STLF component) and nonlinearity (captured by the NNAR component). The model identified in this study is also applicable to hospitals in other regions with similar epidemic outpatient configurations or forecasting tasks whose data conform to long-sequence time series in high frequency exhibiting multiseasonal and nonlinear patterns. However, as external variables and disruptive events were not accounted for, the model performance declined slightly following changes in the COVID-19 containment policy in China. Future work may seek to improve accuracy by incorporating external variables that characterize moving events or other factors as well as by adding data from different organizations to enhance algorithm generalization.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情极大地改变了全球卫生和医疗格局。为应对疫情爆发,中国医院设立了24小时发热门诊来为新冠患者服务。这些门诊的出现以及连续疫情的影响导致就诊人数激增,给医院资源分配和排班带来压力。因此,准确预测门诊就诊人数对于医院管理中的明智决策至关重要。

目的

发热门诊的每小时就诊人数可被视为高频的长序列时间序列,由于疫情背景下儿科治疗行为的特殊性,其还呈现出独特模式。本研究旨在构建模型,以在预测范围内实现出色的预测准确性和强大的泛化能力来预测发热门诊就诊人数。此外,本研究希望为时间序列预测问题提供一种研究范式,其中包括在模型开发前进行探索性分析以揭示数据模式。

方法

进行了包括图形分析、自相关分析和季节性趋势分解在内的探索性分析,以揭示回顾性发热门诊就诊数据的季节性和结构模式。发现数据呈现多季节性和非线性。基于这些结果,在数据集上验证了包括单个模型及其组合在内的时间序列分析方法的集合。均方根误差和平均绝对误差用作准确性指标,并在不同预测范围内进行滚动预测原点的交叉验证。

结果

在大多数预测范围内,混合模型通常优于单个模型。一种新颖的模型组合,即混合神经网络自回归(NNAR)-使用局部加权散点平滑法(Loess)预测的季节性和趋势分解(STLF),被确定为我们预测任务的最优模型,在提前15天预测的所有准确性指标(均方根误差=20.1,平均绝对误差=14.3)中表现最佳,并且在提前1至30天的预测范围内具有总体优势。

结论

尽管预测准确性往往会随着预测范围的增加而下降,但混合NNAR-STLF模型因其能够拟合多季节性(由STLF组件捕获)和非线性(由NNAR组件捕获)而适用于短期、中期和长期预测。本研究中确定的模型也适用于其他地区具有类似疫情门诊配置或预测任务的医院,其数据符合呈现多季节性和非线性模式的高频长序列时间序列。然而,由于未考虑外部变量和干扰事件,在中国新冠疫情防控政策变化后,模型性能略有下降。未来的工作可能寻求通过纳入表征动态事件的外部变量或其他因素以及通过添加来自不同机构的数据来提高算法泛化能力,从而提高准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/9be70e4ea486/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/32687af901d0/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/c8a092a11afd/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/84265784241b/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/305d4ec50e3e/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/700859dab784/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/06df30d83910/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/0e62a4a2f5c2/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/b190096b9d6d/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/58affba2310f/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/7e8ed99fa638/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/ba2e13c06092/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/9c86ff330da1/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/d08a6443d6b2/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/411a3cadb98d/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/9be70e4ea486/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/32687af901d0/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/c8a092a11afd/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/84265784241b/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/305d4ec50e3e/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/700859dab784/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/06df30d83910/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/0e62a4a2f5c2/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/b190096b9d6d/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/58affba2310f/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/7e8ed99fa638/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/ba2e13c06092/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/9c86ff330da1/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/d08a6443d6b2/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/411a3cadb98d/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02f9/10551790/9be70e4ea486/medinform_v11i1e45846_fig15.jpg

相似文献

1
Analyzing and Forecasting Pediatric Fever Clinic Visits in High Frequency Using Ensemble Time-Series Methods After the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hangzhou, China: Retrospective Study.中国杭州新冠疫情后基于集成时间序列方法的高频儿科发热门诊就诊情况分析与预测:一项回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Sep 20;11:e45846. doi: 10.2196/45846.
2
Predictive performance of multi-model ensemble forecasts of COVID-19 across European nations.多模型集成预测对欧洲各国 COVID-19 疫情的预测性能。
Elife. 2023 Apr 21;12:e81916. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81916.
3
Comparative assessment of methods for short-term forecasts of COVID-19 hospital admissions in England at the local level.英格兰本地层面 COVID-19 住院人数短期预测方法的对比评估。
BMC Med. 2022 Feb 21;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02271-x.
4
Forecasting COVID-19 Hospital Census: A Multivariate Time-Series Model Based on Local Infection Incidence.预测 COVID-19 医院普查:基于局部感染发生率的多元时间序列模型。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 4;7(8):e28195. doi: 10.2196/28195.
5
A COVID-19 Pandemic Artificial Intelligence-Based System With Deep Learning Forecasting and Automatic Statistical Data Acquisition: Development and Implementation Study.一种基于人工智能的新冠肺炎大流行深度学习预测与自动统计数据采集系统:开发与实施研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 20;23(5):e27806. doi: 10.2196/27806.
6
An ensemble -sub-epidemic modeling framework for short-term forecasting epidemic trajectories: Application to the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.一种用于短期预测疫情轨迹的集成子疫情建模框架:在美国新冠肺炎疫情中的应用。
medRxiv. 2022 Jun 21:2022.06.19.22276608. doi: 10.1101/2022.06.19.22276608.
7
SpatialWavePredict: a tutorial-based primer and toolbox for forecasting growth trajectories using the ensemble spatial wave sub-epidemic modeling framework.空间波预测:基于教程的入门和工具包,用于使用集合空间波亚流行建模框架预测增长轨迹。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02241-2.
8
Improving the precision of modeling the incidence of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in mainland China with an ensemble machine learning approach.采用集成机器学习方法提高中国大陆肾综合征出血热发病率建模的精度。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 16;16(3):e0248597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248597. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparative assessment of methods for short-term forecasts of COVID-19 hospital admissions in England at the local level.英国地方层面新冠病毒肺炎住院人数短期预测方法的比较评估
medRxiv. 2022 Jan 19:2021.10.18.21265046. doi: 10.1101/2021.10.18.21265046.
10
How New Mexico Leveraged a COVID-19 Case Forecasting Model to Preemptively Address the Health Care Needs of the State: Quantitative Analysis.新墨西哥州如何利用新冠疫情预测模型来预先满足该州的医疗保健需求:定量分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 9;7(6):e27888. doi: 10.2196/27888.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing the dynamic zero-COVID policy in China.优化中国的动态清零政策。
Int J Biol Sci. 2022 Aug 21;18(14):5314-5316. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.75699. eCollection 2022.
2
Forecasting patient arrivals at emergency department using calendar and meteorological information.利用日历和气象信息预测急诊科患者就诊人数
Appl Intell (Dordr). 2022;52(10):11232-11243. doi: 10.1007/s10489-021-03085-9. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
3
China's Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an "Authoritarian" Perspective.中国应对 COVID-19 的公共卫生政策:从“威权主义”的角度。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 15;9:756677. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.756677. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of ARIMA, ETS, NNAR, TBATS and hybrid models to forecast the second wave of COVID-19 hospitalizations in Italy.比较 ARIMA、ETS、NNAR、TBATS 和混合模型,以预测意大利第二波 COVID-19 住院人数。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Aug;23(6):917-940. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01347-4. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
5
Performance evaluation of Emergency Department patient arrivals forecasting models by including meteorological and calendar information: A comparative study.纳入气象和日历信息的急诊科患者到达预测模型的性能评估:一项比较研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Aug;135:104541. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104541. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Pediatric Endocrinology of Post-Pandemic Era.后疫情时代的儿科内分泌学
Chonnam Med J. 2021 May;57(2):103-107. doi: 10.4068/cmj.2021.57.2.103. Epub 2021 May 24.
7
Forecasting emergency department hourly occupancy using time series analysis.运用时间序列分析预测急诊科每小时占用率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.075. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
Impact of COVID-19 on accident and emergency attendances and emergency and planned hospital admissions in Scotland: an interrupted time-series analysis.2019冠状病毒病对苏格兰事故与急诊就诊以及急诊和计划住院的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
J R Soc Med. 2020 Nov;113(11):444-453. doi: 10.1177/0141076820962447. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
9
Forecasting emergency department overcrowding: A deep learning framework.预测急诊科过度拥挤:一个深度学习框架。
Chaos Solitons Fractals. 2020 Oct;139:110247. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110247. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
10
Identifying the effects of an upgraded 'fever clinic' on COVID-19 control and the workload of emergency department: retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in China.识别升级后的“发热门诊”对 COVID-19 控制和急诊科工作量的影响:中国一家三级医院的回顾性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e039177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039177.