• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

感知-听觉训练对口鼻过度鼻音语音分类的影响。

Effect of perceptive-auditory training on the classification of speech hypernasality.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Fonoaudiologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho - UNESP - Marília (SP), Brasil.

Pós-graduação em Ciência da Reabilidação, Hospital de Reabilitação de Anomalias Craniofaciais, Universidade de São Paulo - USP -Bauru (SP), Brasil.

出版信息

Codas. 2023 Sep 15;35(6):e20220069. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022069pt. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20232022069pt
PMID:37729318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10723581/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the effect of auditory-perceptual training by inexperienced speech-language pathologists in the classification of hypernasality in individuals with cleft lip and palate and compare their classification of hypernasality individually, with the gold standard evaluation, before and after this training.

METHODS

Three inexperienced speech-language pathologists used a four-point scale to assess 24 high-pressure speech samples from individuals with cleft lip and palate, before and after auditory-perceptual training. The speech samples corresponded to six samples of each degree of hypernasality. The speech-language pathologists received auditory-perceptual training during the assessments. They had access to anchor samples and immediate feedback of correct answers regarding the degree of hypernasality in training.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the overall percentage of correct answers when comparing before and after the auditory-perceptual training. There was a significant association and agreement of the three evaluators with a gold standard evaluation after training, with an increase in agreement for a single evaluator for absent and mild degrees of hypernasality. The dichotomous analysis of the data showed an increase in the Kappa Index of Agreement of this evaluator. Although there was an increase in the Index of Agreement between evaluators for absent, mild, and severe hypernasality, this increase did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The auditory-perceptual training provided did not result in a significant improvement in the hypernasality classification for the inexperienced speech-language pathologists, even though the individual data analysis showed that the training favored one of the evaluators. Further studies involving gradual and more extensive auditory-perceptual training may favor the classification of hypernasality by inexperienced SLPs.

摘要

目的

分析未经训练的言语治疗师在腭裂患者鼻音过高分类中的听觉感知训练效果,并比较他们在接受训练前后对鼻音过高的个体进行分类,与金标准评估进行比较。

方法

三名未经训练的言语治疗师使用四点量表对 24 名唇腭裂患者的高压力语音样本进行评估,在听觉感知训练前后进行。语音样本对应于每一度鼻音过高的六个样本。言语治疗师在评估期间接受听觉感知训练。他们可以访问锚定样本,并在训练中获得有关鼻音过高程度的正确答案的即时反馈。

结果

在比较听觉感知训练前后,总体正确答案百分比没有显著差异。在训练后,三名评估者与金标准评估之间存在显著的相关性和一致性,对缺失和轻度鼻音过高的单一评估者的一致性有所增加。数据的二项分析显示,该评估者的一致性 Kappa 指数增加。尽管对于缺失、轻度和重度鼻音过高,评估者之间的一致性指数有所增加,但这并未达到统计学意义。

结论

提供的听觉感知训练并未导致未经训练的言语治疗师在鼻音过高分类方面有显著改善,尽管个体数据分析表明,训练有利于其中一名评估者。涉及逐步和更广泛听觉感知训练的进一步研究可能有利于未经训练的言语治疗师对鼻音过高的分类。

相似文献

1
Effect of perceptive-auditory training on the classification of speech hypernasality.感知-听觉训练对口鼻过度鼻音语音分类的影响。
Codas. 2023 Sep 15;35(6):e20220069. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022069pt. eCollection 2023.
2
Influence of speech stimuli in the auditory perceptual identification of hypernasality in individuals with cleft lip and palate.言语刺激对唇腭裂患者鼻音过重听觉感知识别的影响
Codas. 2020 Dec 11;32(6):e20190269. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019269. eCollection 2020.
3
The influence of listener training on the perceptual assessment of hypernasality.听众训练对高鼻音感知评估的影响。
Codas. 2016 Apr;28(2):141-8. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015163.
4
Relationship between velopharyngeal closure, hypernasality, nasal air emission and nasal rustle in subjects with repaired cleft palate.腭裂修复患者的腭咽闭合、高鼻音、鼻漏气及鼻息音之间的关系。
Codas. 2015 May-Jun;27(3):267-72. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014145.
5
Reliability results of perceptual ratings of resonance, nasal airflow and speech acceptability in patients with cleft palate by Ugandan speech-language pathologists following a two-day workshop.经为期两天的研讨会培训后,乌干达言语病理学家对腭裂患者的共鸣、鼻腔气流和语音可接受性的感知评估的可靠性结果。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Sep;136:110191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110191. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
6
Training speech pathology students in the perceptual evaluation of speech in patients with cleft palate: Reliability results and the students' perspective.腭裂患者言语感知评估方面的言语病理学学生培训:可靠性结果及学生观点
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;157:111145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111145. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
7
Impact of inter-judge agreement on perceptual judgment of nasality.评判者间一致性对鼻音感知判断的影响。
Codas. 2014 Sep-Oct;26(5):357-9. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20142014068.
8
Influence of speech sample on perceptual rating of hypernasality.语音样本对鼻音过重感知评分的影响。
Codas. 2016 Jul 7;0:0. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015202.
9
Opinions of Speech-Language Pathologists Regarding Speech Management for Children With Cleft Lip and Palate.言语治疗师对唇腭裂患儿言语管理的看法。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020 Jan;57(1):55-64. doi: 10.1177/1055665619857000. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
10
Reliability of Hypernasality Rating: Comparison of 3 Different Methods for Perceptual Assessment.高鼻音评级的可靠性:三种不同感知评估方法的比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Sep;55(8):1060-1071. doi: 10.1177/1055665618767116. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Classification of speech nasality of individuals with cleft lip and palate with distinct ordinal scales.采用不同等级量表对唇腭裂患者的语音鼻音进行分类。
Codas. 2025 Jan 27;37(1):e20240044. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20240044pt. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Training speech pathology students in the perceptual evaluation of speech in patients with cleft palate: Reliability results and the students' perspective.腭裂患者言语感知评估方面的言语病理学学生培训:可靠性结果及学生观点
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jun;157:111145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2022.111145. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
2
Comparing Methodologies in a Series of Speech Outcome Studies : Challenges and Lessons Learned.一系列言语结果研究中的比较方法:挑战与经验教训
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Jan;55(1):35-44. doi: 10.1177/1055665617718546. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Influence of speech stimuli in the auditory perceptual identification of hypernasality in individuals with cleft lip and palate.言语刺激对唇腭裂患者鼻音过重听觉感知识别的影响
Codas. 2020 Dec 11;32(6):e20190269. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20202019269. eCollection 2020.
4
Pharyngeal bulb prosthesis and speech outcome in patients with cleft palate.腭裂患者咽腔球瓣假体与语音效果。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Mar-Apr;88(2):187-193. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.05.028. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Borg scale: a new method for hypernasality rating.博格量表:一种评估鼻音过重的新方法。
Codas. 2019 Dec 2;31(6):e20180296. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20192018296. eCollection 2019.
6
Analysis of oral-nasal balance after intensive speech therapy combined with speech bulb in speakers with cleft palate and hypernasality.腭裂并鼻音过强患者经强化语言治疗联合言语球囊后口鼻腔平衡分析。
J Commun Disord. 2020 May-Jun;85:105945. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105945. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
7
Speech-language therapy students' auditory-perceptual judgements of simulated concurrent hypernasality and articulation disorders.言语治疗专业学生对模拟并发鼻音亢进和发音障碍的听觉感知判断。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2020 May 3;34(5):479-492. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2019.1655666. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Hypernasality in singing among children with cleft palate: a preliminary study.腭裂儿童歌唱中的超鼻音:一项初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Oct;48(10):1317-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.896. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
9
Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality, audible nasal airflow and speech understandability using ordinal and visual analogue scaling and their relation with nasalance scores.使用序贯和视觉模拟量表对高鼻音、可闻鼻气流和言语可懂度进行感知评估及其与鼻音计评分的关系。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Nov-Dec;76:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
10
Reliability of Hypernasality Rating: Comparison of 3 Different Methods for Perceptual Assessment.高鼻音评级的可靠性:三种不同感知评估方法的比较
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018 Sep;55(8):1060-1071. doi: 10.1177/1055665618767116. Epub 2018 Apr 10.