Institute of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
The College of Health Sciences, Academy of Applied Studies Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Libyan J Med. 2023 Dec;18(1):2258665. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2023.2258665. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
The measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic in the academic 2020/2021 included full-time online courses for medical students in Serbia for the first time since the faculty was founded in 1920. The purpose of this study was to examine the attitudes and opinions about the full-time online course among medical students and their teachers. A qualitative study was carried out in the autumn of 2021. In-depth interviews were conducted with 38 participants (27 students in the 4th study year and 11 teachers who teach in the 3rd study year) about their experiences in the past academic year. To select study participants, purposive sampling was employed. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was applied. Five topics emerged: 1) Theoretical online learning, 2) Practical online learning, 3) Motivation, 4) Technical aspects of online learning and 5) Evaluation of knowledge. Overall, students' attitudes toward theoretical classes were mostly negative, but the attitudes of teachers were mostly positive. However, the attitudes of both students and teachers toward practical online classes were mostly negative. Students were, in general, less motivated to follow online classes compared to conventional courses, even though the teachers felt that they had to put more effort into making a suitable online course. Most participants considered that the online classes had a negative impact on their knowledge and practical skills, but their academic achievement was not inferior compared to previous years. The full-time online course should include conventional on-site teaching. The relevance of acquiring practical skills is strongly emphasized.
2020/2021 学年控制 COVID-19 大流行的措施包括自 1920 年该学院成立以来,塞尔维亚医学生首次全日制在线课程。本研究的目的是调查医学生及其教师对全日制在线课程的态度和意见。2021 年秋季进行了一项定性研究。对 38 名参与者(第 4 学年的 27 名学生和第 3 学年教授的 11 名教师)进行了深入访谈,了解他们过去一学年的经历。为了选择研究参与者,采用了目的性抽样。访谈进行了录音并逐字记录。应用了定性内容分析。出现了五个主题:1)理论在线学习,2)实践在线学习,3)动机,4)在线学习的技术方面,5)知识评估。总体而言,学生对理论课的态度大多是负面的,但教师的态度大多是正面的。然而,学生和教师对实践在线课程的态度大多是负面的。与传统课程相比,学生普遍对在线课程的积极性较低,尽管教师认为他们必须付出更多努力来制作合适的在线课程。大多数参与者认为在线课程对他们的知识和实践技能产生了负面影响,但他们的学业成绩与前几年相比并不逊色。全日制在线课程应包括传统的现场教学。获取实践技能的相关性被强烈强调。