Jarow J P, Cooley B C, Marshall F F
J Urol. 1986 Nov;136(5):1132-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45238-4.
In order to study the efficacy of laser-assisted vasal anastomosis (LAVA), a microscopic carbon dioxide surgical laser (Xanar) was utilized in the anastomoses of human vas deferens in vitro and the Sprague-Dawley rat vas deferens in vivo. The longitudinal tensile and internal hydrostatic pressure strengths of laser-assisted vasal anastomoses were compared to conventional microsurgical suture anastomoses in the human vas deferens. The LAVA group had a greater mean internal hydrostatic pressure strength (p less than 0.001) and a lesser mean longitudinal tensile strength (p less than 0.001) than the conventional microsurgical group. Further evaluation was performed in the Sprague-Dawley rat model, comparing post-operative fertility, patency, healing and sperm granuloma occurrence among four surgically treated groups and a control group: LAVA, conventional suture anastomosis, sham operated, and vasectomized. Light and scanning electron microscopic examination revealed equivalent healing in both the LAVA and conventional groups. Fertility was not statistically different in the LAVA, conventional, control, and sham operated groups. However, the incidence of gross sperm granulomas observed in the LAVA group (80%) was much higher than in the conventional suture anastomosis group (0%). In conclusion, laser-assisted vasal anastomosis is a fast and simple technique for vasal reanastomosis and was as successful (in pregnancies) as conventional suture anastomosis in producing fertility in rats undergoing vasal reanastomosis, but the incidence of sperm granuloma is higher.
为研究激光辅助输精管吻合术(LAVA)的疗效,在体外对人输精管及在体内对斯普拉格-道利大鼠输精管吻合时使用了一台显微二氧化碳外科激光器(Xanar)。将激光辅助输精管吻合术的纵向拉伸强度和内部静水压力强度与传统显微外科缝合吻合术在人输精管中的情况进行了比较。与传统显微外科组相比,LAVA组的平均内部静水压力强度更高(p小于0.001),而平均纵向拉伸强度更低(p小于0.001)。在斯普拉格-道利大鼠模型中进行了进一步评估,比较了四个手术治疗组和一个对照组(LAVA组、传统缝合吻合术组、假手术组和输精管切除组)术后的生育能力、通畅情况、愈合情况及精子肉芽肿的发生情况。光镜和扫描电镜检查显示LAVA组和传统组的愈合情况相当。LAVA组、传统组、对照组和假手术组的生育能力在统计学上无差异。然而,LAVA组观察到的肉眼可见精子肉芽肿发生率(80%)远高于传统缝合吻合术组(0%)。总之,激光辅助输精管吻合术是一种快速简便的输精管再吻合技术,在输精管再吻合的大鼠中,其生育成功率(怀孕方面)与传统缝合吻合术相同,但精子肉芽肿的发生率更高。