• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越结果:在 SARS-CoV-2 的不断检测和监测中临床与研究的关系。

More Than Results: The Clinical and Research Relationship in the Evolving Detection and Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

Avera Institute for Human Genetics, Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

S D Med. 2023 Jun;76(6):248-256.

PMID:37732913
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) became an essential tool for laboratories to provide high-sensitivity qualitative diagnostic testing for patients and real-time data to public health officials. Here we explore the predictive value of quantitative data from RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values in epidemiological measures, symptom presentation, and variant transition.

METHODS

To examine the association with hospitalizations and deaths, data from 74,479 patients referred to the Avera Institute for Human Genetics (AIHG) for COVID-19 testing in 2020 were matched by calendar week to epidemiological data reported by the South Dakota Department of Health. We explored the association between symptom data, patient age, and Ct values for 101 patients. We also explored changes in Ct values during variant transition detected by genomic surveillance sequencing of the AIHG testing population during 2021.

RESULTS

Measures from AIHG diagnostic testing strongly explain variance in the South Dakota state positivity percentage (R2 = 0.758), a two-week delay in hospitalizations (R2 = 0.856), and a four-week delay in deaths (R2 = 0.854). Based on factor analysis of patient symptoms, three groups could be distinguished which had different presentations of age, Ct value, and time from collection. Additionally, conflicting Ct value results among SARSCoV- 2 variants during variant transition may reflect the community transmission dynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of Ct value in RT-PCR diagnostic assays combined with routine screening have valuable applications in monitoring the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 within communities.

摘要

简介

在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)成为实验室为患者提供高灵敏度定性诊断检测和向公共卫生官员提供实时数据的重要工具。在这里,我们探讨了 RT-PCR 循环阈值(Ct)值定量数据在流行病学指标、症状表现和变异转变中的预测价值。

方法

为了研究与住院和死亡的关联,我们将 2020 年向 Avera 人类遗传学研究所(AIHG)进行 COVID-19 检测的 74479 名患者的数据按日历周与南达科他州卫生部报告的流行病学数据相匹配。我们探讨了 101 名患者的症状数据、患者年龄和 Ct 值之间的关联。我们还研究了在 2021 年通过对 AIHG 检测人群的基因组监测测序检测到的变异转变期间 Ct 值的变化。

结果

AIHG 诊断检测的措施强烈解释了南达科他州阳性百分比(R2=0.758)、住院延迟两周(R2=0.856)和死亡延迟四周(R2=0.854)的差异。基于对患者症状的因子分析,可以区分出三组,它们在年龄、Ct 值和采集后时间方面的表现不同。此外,在变异转变期间 SARSCoV-2 变体之间出现相互矛盾的 Ct 值结果可能反映了社区传播动态。

结论

RT-PCR 诊断检测中的 Ct 值测量值与常规筛查相结合,在监测社区内 SARS-CoV-2 的动态方面具有重要应用价值。

相似文献

1
More Than Results: The Clinical and Research Relationship in the Evolving Detection and Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.超越结果:在 SARS-CoV-2 的不断检测和监测中临床与研究的关系。
S D Med. 2023 Jun;76(6):248-256.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
3
Emergency SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern: Novel Multiplex Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for Rapid Detection and Surveillance.关注的紧急 SARS-CoV-2 变异株:用于快速检测和监测的新型多重实时 RT-PCR 检测方法。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0251321. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02513-21.
4
Quantitative analysis of RT-PCR test results for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics across Poland during COVID-19 pandemic: Comparison between early stage and major pandemic waves in 2020 and 2021 with reference to SARS-CoV-2 variants.定量分析 COVID-19 大流行期间波兰各地 SARS-CoV-2 诊断的 RT-PCR 检测结果:2020 年和 2021 年大流行早期阶段与主要流行波之间的比较,并参考了 SARS-CoV-2 变体。
Adv Med Sci. 2022 Sep;67(2):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru.秘鲁唾液 RT-PCR 和鼻咽拭子抗原检测 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断性能评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0086122. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00861-22. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
6
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
[Evaluation of the Rapid Antigen Detection Kit with the Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples].[用于呼吸道样本中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的快速抗原检测试剂盒与聚合酶链反应的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):263-273. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229806.
8
Correlation of Population SARS-CoV-2 Cycle Threshold Values to Local Disease Dynamics: Exploratory Observational Study.人群中 SARS-CoV-2 循环阈值与当地疾病动态的相关性:探索性观察研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 3;7(6):e28265. doi: 10.2196/28265.
9
The Relationship Between Population-Level SARS-CoV-2 Cycle Threshold Values and Trend of COVID-19 Infection: Longitudinal Study.人群水平 SARS-CoV-2 循环阈值与 COVID-19 感染趋势之间的关系:纵向研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 8;8(11):e36424. doi: 10.2196/36424.
10
Rapid and Accurate Identification of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Using Real Time PCR Assays.利用实时 PCR 检测方法快速准确地鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 变异株。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 May 10;12:894613. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.894613. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Cycle Threshold Values of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR during Outbreaks in Nursing Homes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.养老院疫情期间新冠病毒逆转录聚合酶链反应的循环阈值:一项回顾性队列研究
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2024 Oct 16;5(4):658-668. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5040046.