• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项电子与纸质患者报告结局采集(SPRUCE)的试验中进行研究:一项部分随机患者偏好研究的研究方案。

Study within a trial of electronic versus paper-based Patient-Reported oUtcomes CollEction (SPRUCE): study protocol for a partially randomised patient preference study.

机构信息

Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Independent Patient Representative, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e073817. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073817.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073817
PMID:37734892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10514621/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are currently collected from trial participants using paper questionnaires by the Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU). Streamlining PRO collection using electronic questionnaires (ePRO) may improve data collection and patient experience. Here, we outline our protocol for a Study within a trial of electronic versus paper-based Patient-Reported oUtcomes CollEction (SPRUCE), which investigates the acceptability of ePRO in oncology clinical trials.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

SPRUCE was developed alongside patient and public contributors. SPRUCE runs in multiple host trials with a partially randomised patient preference design, allowing participants to be randomised or choose their preference of electronic or paper questionnaires. Questionnaires are scheduled in accordance with host trial follow-up. The primary objective will assess differences in return rates (compliance) between ePRO and paper PROs at the first timepoint post-host trial intervention in the randomised group. Paper PRO compliance is expected to be 90%. 244 randomised participants are required to exclude ≤80% compliance rates with ePRO (10% non-inferiority margin, with 80% power and one-sided alpha=0.05). SPRUCE aims to assess acceptability of ePRO in oncology clinical trials, establish whether ePRO is acceptable to ICR-CTSU trial participants and can capture complete PRO data, consistent with paper PROs.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The SPRUCE protocol (ICR-CTSU/2021/10074) was approved by the Coventry and Warwick Central Research Ethics Committee (21/WM/0223) on 21 October 2021. Results will be disseminated via presentations, publications and lay summaries. No participant identifiable data will be included.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

SWAT169.

摘要

简介

目前,癌症研究所临床试验和统计学部门(ICR-CTSU)通过纸质问卷收集试验参与者的患者报告结局(PRO)。使用电子问卷(ePRO)简化 PRO 收集可能会改善数据收集和患者体验。在这里,我们概述了一项电子与纸质患者报告结局收集研究(SPRUCE)的试验内研究方案,该研究调查了电子 PRO 在肿瘤临床试验中的可接受性。

方法与分析

SPRUCE 是与患者和公众贡献者共同开发的。SPRUCE 在多个宿主试验中运行,采用部分随机患者偏好设计,允许参与者随机分配或选择电子或纸质问卷。问卷按照宿主试验随访进行安排。主要目标将评估随机组在宿主试验干预后的第一个时间点电子 PRO 和纸质 PRO 的回复率(依从性)之间的差异。预计纸质 PRO 的依从率为 90%。需要 244 名随机参与者排除电子 PRO 的依从率≤80%(10%非劣效性边际,80%效力和单侧 alpha=0.05)。SPRUCE 旨在评估电子 PRO 在肿瘤临床试验中的可接受性,确定电子 PRO 是否被 ICR-CTSU 试验参与者接受,并且能够与纸质 PRO 一致地捕获完整的 PRO 数据。

伦理与传播

SPRUCE 方案(ICR-CTSU/2021/10074)于 2021 年 10 月 21 日获得考文垂和沃里克中央研究伦理委员会(21/WM/0223)的批准。结果将通过演讲、出版物和通俗摘要进行传播。不会包含任何可识别参与者的个人数据。

试验注册

SWAT169。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ebf/10514621/7217c2cb581b/bmjopen-2023-073817f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ebf/10514621/7217c2cb581b/bmjopen-2023-073817f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ebf/10514621/7217c2cb581b/bmjopen-2023-073817f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Study within a trial of electronic versus paper-based Patient-Reported oUtcomes CollEction (SPRUCE): study protocol for a partially randomised patient preference study.在一项电子与纸质患者报告结局采集(SPRUCE)的试验中进行研究:一项部分随机患者偏好研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 21;13(9):e073817. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073817.
2
Feasibility of a new electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) system for an advanced therapy clinical trial in immune-mediated inflammatory disease (PROmics): protocol for a qualitative feasibility study.一种新型电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统用于免疫介导的炎症性疾病(PROmics)的先进治疗临床试验的可行性:定性可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 6;12(9):e063199. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063199.
3
Longitudinal study of symptom burden in outpatients with advanced cancers based on electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) platform: a single institution, prospective study protocol.基于电子患者报告结局(ePRO)平台的晚期癌症门诊患者症状负担的纵向研究:一项单中心、前瞻性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 20;10(11):e038223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038223.
4
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
5
Use of In-Game Rewards to Motivate Daily Self-Report Compliance: Randomized Controlled Trial.使用游戏内奖励激励每日自我报告依从性:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 3;21(1):e11683. doi: 10.2196/11683.
6
Use of daily electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) diaries in randomized controlled trials for rheumatoid arthritis: rationale and implementation.在类风湿关节炎随机对照试验中使用每日电子患者报告结局(PRO)日记:基本原理与实施
Trials. 2019 Mar 22;20(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3272-0.
7
Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) solution for patients with inflammatory diseases in an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product (ATMP) basket trial.炎症性疾病患者在先进治疗药物产品(ATMP)篮子试验中电子患者报告结局(ePRO)解决方案的开发和可用性测试。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Oct 9;7(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00634-3.
8
Protocol for a mixed-methods study to develop and feasibility test a digital system for the capture of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies (the PRO-CAR-T study).嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)疗法治疗患者中患者报告结局(PROs)采集数字系统的开发和可行性测试的混合方法研究方案(PRO-CAR-T 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 29;14(3):e085392. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085392.
9
Design and evaluation of a digital health intervention with proactive follow-up by nurses to improve healthcare and outcomes for patients with breast cancer in Mexico: protocol for a randomised clinical trial.一种由护士主动跟进的数字健康干预措施的设计和评估,旨在改善墨西哥乳腺癌患者的医疗保健和结局:一项随机临床试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 6;13(11):e077322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077322.
10
Patient Reported Outcome Measures in cancer care: a hybrid effectiveness-Implementation trial to optimise Symptom control and health service Experience (PROMISE)-protocol for a randomised controlled trial of electronic self-reporting of symptoms versus usual care during and following treatment in patients with cancer.癌症护理中的患者报告结局测量:一项混合有效性-实施试验,旨在优化症状控制和卫生服务体验(PROMISE)-方案,用于在癌症患者治疗期间和治疗后进行电子自我报告症状与常规护理的随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):e090836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090836.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and public involvement in the SPRUCE methodology study investigating electronic patient reported outcomes in oncology clinical trials.患者和公众参与SPRUCE方法学研究,该研究调查肿瘤临床试验中患者报告的电子结局。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 1;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00742-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Web-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Personalized Treatment and Care (PROMPT-Care): Multicenter Pragmatic Nonrandomized Trial.基于网络的患者报告结局测量用于个性化治疗和护理(PROMPT-Care):多中心实用非随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 29;22(10):e19685. doi: 10.2196/19685.
2
Characteristics of Participation in Patient-Reported Outcomes and Electronic Data Capture Components of NRG Oncology Clinical Trials.参与 NRG 肿瘤学临床试验中患者报告结局和电子数据采集部分的特点。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Nov 15;108(4):950-959. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.030. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
3
Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems.
电子患者报告结局(ePRO)系统可用性测试的关键方法学考虑因素。
Qual Life Res. 2020 Feb;29(2):325-333. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02329-z. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
4
Comparison between an electronic version of the foot and ankle outcome score and the standard paper version: A randomized multicenter study.足踝结局评分电子版与标准纸质版的比较:一项随机多中心研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(40):e17440. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017440.
5
Measurement Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Response Scale Types Collected Using Bring Your Own Device Compared to Paper and a Provisioned Device: Results of a Randomized Equivalence Trial.使用自带设备与纸质和专用设备收集的患者报告结局测量反应量表类型的测量等效性:一项随机等效性试验的结果。
Value Health. 2018 May;21(5):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
6
Electronic patient self-Reporting of Adverse-events: Patient Information and aDvice (eRAPID): a randomised controlled trial in systemic cancer treatment.电子患者不良反应自我报告:患者信息和建议(eRAPID):一项系统性癌症治疗的随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2017 May 8;17(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3303-8.
7
Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013.患者报告结局测量的电子管理与纸质管理的等效性:对2007年至2013年间开展的研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 7;13:167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0362-x.
8
PRO data collection in clinical trials using mixed modes: report of the ISPOR PRO mixed modes good research practices task force.临床研究中使用混合模式进行 PRO 数据收集:ISPOR PRO 混合模式良好研究实践工作组的报告。
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):501-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.06.005.
9
Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.关于支持电子和纸质患者报告结局(PRO)测量等效性所需证据的建议:国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)电子PRO良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
10
Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review.患者报告结局测量的电子管理与纸笔管理的等效性:一项荟萃分析综述。
Value Health. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):322-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00231.x.