Medical Microbiology, Interdisciplinary and International Program, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2023 Sep 21;22(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12941-023-00637-4.
This study investigated the differences in epidemiological and clinical data, and antimicrobial susceptibilities among different subspecies of Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC) clinical isolates at a medical school in Thailand.
A total of 143 MABSC clinical isolates recovered from 74 patients were genotypically analyzed for erm(41), rrl, and rrs mutations, and antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using a broth microdilution method. Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were reviewed from the medical records.
Seventy-four patients were infected with 28/74 (37.8%) M. abscessus subspecies abscessus (MAB), 43/74 (58.1%) M. abscessus subsp. massiliense (MMA), and 3/74 (4.1%) M. abscessus subsp. bolletii (MBO). The clinical findings and outcomes were generally indistinguishable between the three subspecies. All three subspecies of MABSC clinical isolates exhibited high resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, moxifloxacin, TMP/SMX, and tobramycin. MAB had the highest resistance rates to clarithromycin (27.8%, 20/72) and amikacin (6.9%, 5/72) compared to MBO and MMA, with p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively. In addition, the rough morphotype was significantly associated with resistance to amikacin (8.9%, 5/56), clarithromycin (26.8%, 15/56), and imipenem (76.8%, 43/56) (p < 0.001), whereas the smooth morphotype was resistant to linezolid (57.1%, 48/84) (p = 0.002). In addition, T28 of erm(41), rrl (A2058C/G and A2059C/G), and rrs (A1408G) mutations were detected in 87.4% (125/143), 16.1% (23/143), and 9.1% (13/143) of MABSC isolates, respectively.
Three MABSC subspecies caused a variety of infections in patients with different underlying comorbidities. The drug susceptibility patterns of the recent circulating MABSC strains in Thailand were different among the three MABSC subspecies and two morphotypes.
本研究旨在探讨泰国某医学院不同亚种的脓肿分枝杆菌复合体(MABSC)临床分离株的流行病学和临床数据以及抗菌药物敏感性的差异。
对 74 例患者的 143 株 MABSC 临床分离株进行 erm(41)、rrl 和 rrs 突变的基因分型分析,并采用肉汤微量稀释法测定抗菌药物敏感性。从病历中回顾患者特征和临床结局。
74 例患者感染 28/74(37.8%)M. abscessus 亚种脓肿(MAB)、43/74(58.1%)M. abscessus 亚种马萨里蒂(MMA)和 3/74(4.1%)M. abscessus 亚种博莱蒂(MBO)。三种亚种的 MABSC 临床分离株的临床发现和结局通常无法区分。所有三种亚种的 MABSC 临床分离株对环丙沙星、强力霉素、莫西沙星、TMP/SMX 和妥布霉素的耐药率均较高。MAB 对克拉霉素(27.8%,20/72)和阿米卡星(6.9%,5/72)的耐药率均高于 MBO 和 MMA,差异有统计学意义(p<0.001 和 p=0.004)。此外,粗糙表型与阿米卡星(8.9%,5/56)、克拉霉素(26.8%,15/56)和亚胺培南(76.8%,43/56)的耐药性显著相关(p<0.001),而光滑表型对利奈唑胺(57.1%,48/84)的耐药性显著相关(p=0.002)。此外,T28 型 erm(41)、rrl(A2058C/G 和 A2059C/G)和 rrs(A1408G)突变分别在 87.4%(125/143)、16.1%(23/143)和 9.1%(13/143)的 MABSC 分离株中检出。
三种 MABSC 亚种可导致不同基础合并症患者发生多种感染。泰国近期流行的 MABSC 菌株的药敏谱在三种 MABSC 亚种和两种形态之间存在差异。