• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症化疗患者经外周中心静脉置管相关并发症的临床特征:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Clinical characteristics of peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a prospective and observational study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University / West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37 Guo Xue Street, PO Box 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P.R. China.

Division of Abdominal Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University / West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37 Guo Xue Street, PO Box 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, P.R. China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11413-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-023-11413-0
PMID:37736715
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10515037/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The incidence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related complications is higher in cancer patients than in noncancer patients. However, the pattern of specific complication occurrence over time remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of PICC-related complications in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

This prospective, observational study was conducted at a university-affiliated hospital in Western China. Cancer patients undergoing PICC insertion for anticancer treatment were recruited and followed up until the first week after catheter removal. Any complications, including occurrence time and outcomes, were recorded. The trajectory of specific PICC-related complications over time were identify based on the Kaplan‒Meier curve analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 233 patients analyzed, nearly half (n = 112/233, 48.1%) developed 150 PICC-related complication events. The most common were symptomatic catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) (n = 37/233, 15.9%), medical adhesive-related skin injury (MARSI) (n = 27/233, 11.6%), and catheter dislodgement (n = 17/233, 7.3%), accounting for 54.0% (n = 81/150, 54.0%) of total complications events. According to Kaplan‒Meier curve analysis, symptomatic CRT, pain, phlebitis, and insertion site bleeding were classified as the "early onset" group mainly occurring within the first month post-insertion. Catheter fracture and catheter-related bloodstream infection were classified as the "late onset" group occurring after the second month post-insertion. MARSI, catheter dislodgement, occlusion, and insertion site infection were classified as the "persistent onset" group persistently occurring during the whole catheter-dwelling period. Among the 112 patients with PICC-related complications, 50 (44.6%) patients had their catheters removed due to complications, and 62 (55.4%) patients successfully retained their catheters until treatment completion through conventional interventions. The major reasons for unplanned catheter removal were catheter dislodgement (n = 12/233, 5.2%), symptomatic CRT (n = 10/233, 4.3%), and MARSI (n = 7/233, 3.0%), accounting for 58.0% (n = 29/50, 58.0%) of the total unplanned catheter removal cases. Catheter dwelling times between patients with complications under successful interventions (130.5 ± 32.1 days) and patients with no complications (138.2 ± 46.4 days) were not significantly different (t = 1.306, p = 0.194; log-rank test = 2.610, p = 0.106).

CONCLUSIONS

PICC-related complications were pretty common in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The time distribution of PICC-related complications varied, and medical staff should develop time-specific protocols for prevention. Because more than half of the patients with PICC-related complications could be managed with conventional interventions, PICCs remain a priority for cancer patients undergoing short-term chemotherapy. The study was registered in 02/08/2019 at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR1900024890).

摘要

目的

与非癌症患者相比,癌症患者外周中心静脉置管(PICC)相关并发症的发生率更高。然而,特定并发症随时间发生的模式仍不清楚。本研究的目的是调查接受化疗的癌症患者中 PICC 相关并发症的临床特征。

方法

这项前瞻性观察性研究在我国西部的一所大学附属医院进行。招募接受 PICC 置管以进行抗癌治疗的癌症患者,并在导管移除后的第一周进行随访。记录任何并发症,包括发生时间和结局。根据 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析确定特定 PICC 相关并发症的随时间变化轨迹。

结果

在分析的 233 名患者中,近一半(n=112/233,48.1%)发生了 150 次 PICC 相关并发症事件。最常见的是有症状的导管相关血栓形成(CRT)(n=37/233,15.9%)、医用胶粘剂相关皮肤损伤(MARSI)(n=27/233,11.6%)和导管移位(n=17/233,7.3%),占总并发症事件的 54.0%(n=81/150,54.0%)。根据 Kaplan-Meier 曲线分析,有症状的 CRT、疼痛、静脉炎和置管部位出血被归类为“早期发作”组,主要发生在置管后第一个月内。导管骨折和导管相关性血流感染被归类为“晚期发作”组,发生在置管后第二个月后。MARSI、导管移位、阻塞和置管部位感染被归类为“持续发作”组,在整个导管留置期间持续发生。在 112 名有 PICC 相关并发症的患者中,50 名(44.6%)患者因并发症而拔除导管,62 名(55.4%)患者通过常规干预成功保留导管直至治疗结束。计划外导管拔除的主要原因是导管移位(n=12/233,5.2%)、有症状的 CRT(n=10/233,4.3%)和 MARSI(n=7/233,3.0%),占总计划外导管拔除病例的 58.0%(n=29/50,58.0%)。成功干预的并发症患者(130.5±32.1 天)和无并发症患者(138.2±46.4 天)的导管留置时间无显著差异(t=1.306,p=0.194;log-rank 检验=2.610,p=0.106)。

结论

在接受化疗的癌症患者中,PICC 相关并发症相当常见。PICC 相关并发症的时间分布不同,医务人员应制定特定时间的预防方案。由于超过一半的 PICC 相关并发症患者可以通过常规干预措施进行管理,因此 PICC 仍然是接受短期化疗的癌症患者的首选。该研究于 2019 年 2 月 8 日在中国临床试验注册中心(注册号:ChiCTR1900024890)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/48b8f1ba2657/12885_2023_11413_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/ebf3adcb5caf/12885_2023_11413_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/5e8a52131a78/12885_2023_11413_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/2f3f5814317d/12885_2023_11413_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/c56a13d80f31/12885_2023_11413_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/cbcd9027edce/12885_2023_11413_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/ccb0e41a0a36/12885_2023_11413_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/40319e0f1592/12885_2023_11413_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/48b8f1ba2657/12885_2023_11413_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/ebf3adcb5caf/12885_2023_11413_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/5e8a52131a78/12885_2023_11413_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/2f3f5814317d/12885_2023_11413_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/c56a13d80f31/12885_2023_11413_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/cbcd9027edce/12885_2023_11413_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/ccb0e41a0a36/12885_2023_11413_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/40319e0f1592/12885_2023_11413_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb03/10515037/48b8f1ba2657/12885_2023_11413_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical characteristics of peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a prospective and observational study.癌症化疗患者经外周中心静脉置管相关并发症的临床特征:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11413-0.
2
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: A prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures.化疗期间癌症患者的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC):并发症发生率及总体失败情况的前瞻性研究
J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;113(6):708-14. doi: 10.1002/jso.24220. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
3
Peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 50,000 catheter days.癌症患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管相关并发症:一项超过50000导管日的前瞻性研究
J Vasc Access. 2017 Mar 21;18(2):153-157. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000670. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
4
Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness for peripherally inserted central catheters in adult acute hospital patients (CASCADE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.成人急性医院患者外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的中心静脉通路装置固定与敷料有效性研究(CASCADE):一项试点随机对照试验
Trials. 2017 Oct 4;18(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2207-x.
5
Peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates with upper versus lower extremity insertion sites.上肢与下肢穿刺部位的新生儿经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管并发症
Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Jun;13(3):198-204. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e31827e1d01.
6
A Frontline Approach With Peripherally Inserted Versus Centrally Inserted Central Venous Catheters for Remission Induction Chemotherapy Phase of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Randomized Comparison.急性髓系白血病缓解诱导化疗期经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管与中心静脉置管的一线对比:一项随机比较。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019 Apr;19(4):e184-e194. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
7
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.住院固体肿瘤患者中经外周插入中心静脉导管的使用模式和结局:一项多中心研究。
Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
8
Prevalence of medical adhesive-related skin injury at peripherally inserted central catheter insertion site in oncology patients.肿瘤患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管部位医用胶粘剂相关皮肤损伤的发生率
J Vasc Access. 2018 Jan;19(1):23-27. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000805.
9
Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.外周置入中心静脉导管与植入式港静脉导管在癌症患者中的临床影响:一项开放标签、随机、两中心试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Jun;122(6):734-741. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.038. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
A randomised, controlled trial comparing the long-term effects of peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy patients using B-mode ultrasound with modified Seldinger technique versus blind puncture.一项随机对照试验,比较在化疗患者中使用B超引导改良塞丁格技术经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管与盲穿置管的长期效果。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Feb;18(1):94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Discharge Readiness and Factors in Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Carriers with Malignant Tumors: A Meta-Analysis.评估恶性肿瘤患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管携带者的出院准备情况及相关因素:一项荟萃分析。
Iran J Public Health. 2025 May;54(5):951-962. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i5.18630.
2
Construction of a home-based self-management program for patients with indwelling peripherally inserted central catheter based on the IMB model.基于IMB模型构建居家自我管理项目用于带外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的患者
BMC Nurs. 2025 Apr 17;24(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03056-2.
3
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for PICC-related venous thrombosis in patients with cancer: a prospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical factors of PICC-RVT in cancer patients: a meta-analysis.癌症患者经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关性血栓的临床因素:一项荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Jun 14;31(7):393. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07855-8.
2
Different epidemiology of bloodstream infections in COVID-19 compared to non-COVID-19 critically ill patients: a descriptive analysis of the Eurobact II study.COVID-19 与非 COVID-19 危重症患者血流感染的不同流行病学特征:Eurobact II 研究的描述性分析。
Crit Care. 2022 Oct 18;26(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04166-y.
3
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.
癌症患者经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管相关静脉血栓形成风险预测模型的开发与验证:一项前瞻性队列研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 7;15(1):4654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89260-1.
4
Complications of tunneled and non-tunneled peripherally inserted central catheter placement in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients: a meta-analysis.化疗癌症患者经隧道式和非隧道式外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管的并发症:一项荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 15;11:1469847. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1469847. eCollection 2024.
5
Catheter and Non-Catheter-Related Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: Survival, Anticoagulation Efficacy, and Safety.癌症患者的导管和非导管相关静脉血栓栓塞症:生存、抗凝疗效和安全性。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2024 Jan-Dec;30:10760296241282771. doi: 10.1177/10760296241282771.
6
Trends in the prevalence and risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients from 2016 to 2022: a multicenter study.2016 年至 2022 年癌症患者中经外周中心静脉置管相关并发症的流行趋势及危险因素:一项多中心研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Mar 21;32(4):239. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08444-z.
住院固体肿瘤患者中经外周插入中心静脉导管的使用模式和结局:一项多中心研究。
Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
4
Cost-utility analysis of centrally inserted totally implanted access port (PORT) vs. peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the oncology chemotherapy.在肿瘤化疗中,中央置入式完全植入式输液港(PORT)与经外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)的成本-效用分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 22;10:942175. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.942175. eCollection 2022.
5
Duration of central venous catheter placement and central line-associated bloodstream infections after the adoption of prevention bundles: a two-year retrospective study.预防套件采用后中心静脉导管留置时间和中心静脉导管相关血流感染:一项为期两年的回顾性研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Jul 15;11(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01131-w.
6
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on choice of central venous access device for delivery of chemotherapy.一项关于化疗中央静脉通路装置选择的随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Sep;10(5):1184-1191.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
7
Occurrence rate and risk factors for long-term central line-associated bloodstream infections in patients with cancer: A systematic review.癌症患者中长期中心静脉导管相关血流感染的发生率及危险因素:系统评价。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Apr;19(2):100-111. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12574. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
8
Patterns of vascular access device use and thrombosis outcomes in patients with COVID-19: a pilot multi-site study of Michigan hospitals.COVID-19 患者血管通路装置使用和血栓形成结局的模式:密歇根州医院的一项多中心试点研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Feb;53(2):257-263. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02559-4. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
9
Applicability of TIVAP versus PICC in non-hematological malignancies patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review.TIVAP 与 PICC 在非血液恶性肿瘤患者中的应用比较:Meta 分析和系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 3;16(8):e0255473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255473. eCollection 2021.
10
Venous access devices for the delivery of long-term chemotherapy: the CAVA three-arm RCT.用于长期化疗的静脉通路装置:CAVA 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jul;25(47):1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta25470.