Valenti Giusy D, Bottaro Rossella, Faraci Palmira
University of Palermo, Italy.
University of Enna "Kore", Italy.
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Mar;47(1):52-65. doi: 10.1177/01632787231203380. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
The current study aimed at investigating the two sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality of the Nomophobia Questionnaire (NMP-Q), applying the newly developed bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (B-ESEM) approach. We first contrasted several CFA and ESEM models to test the psychometric multidimensionality due to the fallibility of indicators. Then, we compared the first-order structures with those specifying both global and specific factors to test the coexistence of hierarchically ordered factors. Results from 469 participants to the 20-item questionnaire showed the superiority of a B-ESEM representation with a well-defined G-factor and four weaker S-factors. On a methodological level, our findings provide additional support for the utility of using B-ESEM's integrative perspective to better capture the complexity of multidimensional constructs.
本研究旨在运用新开发的双因素探索性结构方程模型(B-ESEM)方法,探究无手机恐惧症问卷(NMP-Q)在与构念相关的心理测量多维性方面的两个来源。我们首先对比了几个验证性因素分析(CFA)和探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)模型,以检验由于指标的易出错性导致的心理测量多维性。然后,我们将一阶结构与那些同时指定全局和特定因素的结构进行比较,以检验分层有序因素的共存情况。对469名参与20项问卷的受访者的研究结果表明,具有明确界定的G因素和四个较弱S因素的B-ESEM表示形式具有优越性。在方法层面,我们的研究结果为使用B-ESEM的综合视角更好地捕捉多维构念的复杂性的效用提供了额外支持。