Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Microvida, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Microvida, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Dec;29(12):1595-1599. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.09.011. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of a combined SARS-CoV-2/influenza rapid antigen test (SIRAT) and to evaluate a SIRAT-based hospital isolation policy awaiting RT-PCR results for patients presenting at the emergency department (ED).
We performed a prospective observational study including all adult patients presenting with influenza-like symptoms at the ED of two hospitals from 31 October 2022 to 31 March 2023. A SIRAT and SARS-CoV-2 and influenza RT-PCR were performed on upper respiratory samples. SIRAT results were compared with RT-PCR. Droplet and contact isolation measures (DCIM) were imposed based on SIRAT results awaiting RT-PCR. We monitored symptomatic nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 and influenza infections potentially caused by delayed isolation of patients with false negative SIRAT and the hours of unnecessary DCIM saved.
We included 1740 patients of whom 1296 were hospitalized. SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B prevalence were 12.7% (221/1740) and 9.9% (171/1740). Sensitivity and specificity of the SIRAT were 67.7% (95% CI 61.1-73.9%) (149/220) and 99.4% (95% CI 99.0-99.8%) (1510/1518) for SARS-CoV-2 and 52.7% (95% CI 44.9-60.4%) (89/169) and 99.1% (95% CI 98.5-99.5%) (1530/1544) for influenza A/B. We found a 0% nosocomial transmission risk for SARS-CoV-2 (95% CI 0-8.8%) and influenza (95% CI 0-10%). In all, 8712 hours in total or a median up to 6 hours 59 minutes (IQR (interquartile range) 11h03) per patient of unnecessary DCIM were saved.
A SIRAT-guided hospital isolation policy awaiting RT-PCR results for patients who present at the ED can save unnecessary isolation hours without having to lead to significant symptomatic nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 or influenza viruses.
本研究旨在评估一种 SARS-CoV-2/流感联合抗原快速检测(SIRAT)的临床性能,并评估一种基于 SIRAT 的医院隔离政策,该政策等待 RT-PCR 结果以对急诊科就诊的患者进行隔离。
我们进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,纳入了 2022 年 10 月 31 日至 2023 年 3 月 31 日期间两家医院急诊科出现流感样症状的所有成年患者。对上呼吸道样本进行 SIRAT 和 SARS-CoV-2 和流感 RT-PCR 检测。比较 SIRAT 结果和 RT-PCR 结果。根据 SIRAT 结果等待 RT-PCR,实施飞沫和接触隔离措施(DCIM)。我们监测了由于对假阴性 SIRAT 患者的隔离延迟而导致的有症状的医院内 SARS-CoV-2 和流感感染的发生情况,以及节省的不必要的 DCIM 时间。
我们纳入了 1740 名患者,其中 1296 名住院。SARS-CoV-2 和流感 A/B 的流行率分别为 12.7%(221/1740)和 9.9%(171/1740)。SIRAT 的敏感性和特异性分别为 67.7%(95%CI 61.1-73.9%)(149/220)和 99.4%(95%CI 99.0-99.8%)(1510/1518)用于 SARS-CoV-2 和 52.7%(95%CI 44.9-60.4%)(89/169)和 99.1%(95%CI 98.5-99.5%)(1530/1544)用于流感 A/B。我们发现 SARS-CoV-2(95%CI 0-8.8%)和流感(95%CI 0-10%)的医院内传播风险为 0%。总共节省了 8712 小时的不必要的 DCIM,或每位患者中位数节省了 6 小时 59 分钟(IQR(四分位距)11h03)。
SIRAT 指导的急诊科就诊患者等待 RT-PCR 结果的医院隔离政策可以节省不必要的隔离时间,而不会导致 SARS-CoV-2 或流感病毒的显著有症状的医院内传播。