Siu A L, Sonnenberg F A, Manning W G, Goldberg G A, Bloomfield E S, Newhouse J P, Brook R H
N Engl J Med. 1986 Nov 13;315(20):1259-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198611133152005.
We examined geographic variation in the rate of inappropriate hospitalization and the effect of cost sharing on that rate. The medical records of 1132 adults hospitalized in a randomized trial of health insurance plans were reviewed by two physicians who were blinded to the patients' insurance plan. They judged 23 percent of the admissions to be inappropriate and an additional 17 percent to have been avoidable by the use of ambulatory surgery. The percentage of inappropriate admissions varied among six sites (from 10 to 35 percent), but areas with low total admission rates did not necessarily have low proportions of inappropriate admissions. In plans with cost sharing for all services, 22 percent of admissions and 34 percent of hospital days were classified as inappropriate, as compared with 24 percent of admissions and 35 percent of hospital days in the plan under which care was free to the patient (these differences were not statistically significant). Our data show that a substantial fraction of hospitalization is potentially avoidable. Because cost sharing did not selectively reduce inappropriate hospitalization, it is important to develop other mechanisms to do so.
我们研究了不适当住院率的地理差异以及费用分担对该比率的影响。在一项医疗保险计划随机试验中住院的1132名成年人的病历由两名对患者保险计划不知情的医生进行了审查。他们判定23%的入院是不适当的,另有17%的入院通过使用门诊手术是可以避免的。不适当入院的百分比在六个地点有所不同(从10%到35%),但总入院率低的地区不一定不适当入院的比例也低。在所有服务都有费用分担的计划中,22%的入院和34%的住院天数被归类为不适当,而在患者无需付费的计划中,这一比例分别为24%的入院和35%的住院天数(这些差异无统计学意义)。我们的数据表明,很大一部分住院是有可能避免的。由于费用分担并没有选择性地减少不适当住院,因此开发其他机制来做到这一点很重要。