• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Highest Grade Group Does Not Drive the Risk of Recurrence when Systematic and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-targeted Biopsies are Discordant: Preliminary Findings Using Radical Prostatectomy Pathology as a Surrogate for MRI-targeted Biopsy Grade.当系统和多参数磁共振成像(MRI)靶向活检结果不一致时,最高分级组不会增加复发风险:以 MRI 靶向活检分级为替代指标的根治性前列腺切除术病理的初步发现。
Eur Urol Focus. 2024 May;10(3):486-488. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection.靶向多参数磁共振成像/超声融合活检在根治性前列腺切除标本中对定量 Gleason 4 分级预测的应用:对主动监测候选者选择的影响。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Mar;9(2):303-308. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.在未经活检的男性中检测具有临床意义的前列腺癌:系统活检、多参数 MRI 和对比超声弥散成像靶向活检的直接比较。
BJU Int. 2020 Oct;126(4):481-493. doi: 10.1111/bju.15093. Epub 2020 May 13.
4
Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.在未经前列腺活检的患者中进行前列腺癌风险评估:多参数磁共振成像-经直肠超声(TRUS)融合活检和系统 TRUS 活检中的鹿特丹前列腺癌风险计算器。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE).磁共振成像靶向与系统前列腺活检:一项前瞻性随机试验(PRECISE)的 2 年随访结果。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Jun;7(3):456-461. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
6
Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Systematic Template Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: A Comparison of Transperineal and Transrectal Approaches.经会阴与经直肠途径前列腺系统模板整合磁共振融合靶向穿刺与根治性前列腺切除术标本间 Gleason 分级分组一致性比较。
Urology. 2023 May;175:151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.001. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
7
Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.经会阴模板引导式饱和与靶向前列腺活检的男性前列腺癌检出率。
Prostate. 2022 Feb;82(3):388-396. doi: 10.1002/pros.24286. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
8
Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions.优化联合磁共振成像(MRI)靶向和系统活检策略:在仅存在外周多参数MRI可疑病变的情况下,保留多参数MRI阴性的移行区。
J Urol. 2022 Feb;207(2):333-340. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002248. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
9
The impact of mpMRI-targeted vs systematic biopsy on the risk of prostate cancer downgrading at final pathology.mpMRI 靶向与系统活检对最终病理前列腺癌降级风险的影响。
World J Urol. 2024 Apr 22;42(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04963-w.
10
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by transperineal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy in smaller prostates.经会阴多参数磁共振成像-超声融合靶向前列腺活检在较小前列腺中检测临床显著前列腺癌。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Oct;40(10):451.e9-451.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Performance: Data from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group.前列腺磁共振成像性能的差异:来自前列腺活检协作组的数据。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 May 2. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.007.

当系统和多参数磁共振成像(MRI)靶向活检结果不一致时,最高分级组不会增加复发风险:以 MRI 靶向活检分级为替代指标的根治性前列腺切除术病理的初步发现。

The Highest Grade Group Does Not Drive the Risk of Recurrence when Systematic and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-targeted Biopsies are Discordant: Preliminary Findings Using Radical Prostatectomy Pathology as a Surrogate for MRI-targeted Biopsy Grade.

机构信息

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur Urol Focus. 2024 May;10(3):486-488. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.07.011. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2023.07.011
PMID:37739916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10950835/
Abstract

Pathology grading of prostate biopsy follows the rule that the highest International Society of Urological Pathology grade group (GG) is the GG assigned. This rule was developed in the systematic biopsy (SBx) era and makes sense when samples are from very different areas of the prostate. This rule has been kept for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx), for which multiple samples-targeted and systematic-are taken from small areas. In particular, if the results for SBx and MRI-TBx are discordant, the patient is assigned the higher GG. However, the most appropriate grading when MRI-TBx and SBx grades are discordant has never been investigated empirically. A cohort of patients who have undergone SBx and MRI-TBx with long oncological follow-up does not yet exist. To estimate the risk of recurrence for every combination of biopsy and pathological grades, we used the GG on radical prostatectomy (RP) as a surrogate for GG on MRI-TBx GG surrogate. We analyzed data for 12 468 men who underwent SBx and RP at a tertiary referral center and assessed 5-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) for each pairwise combination of biopsy and surgical GG results. We found that for cases with discordant SBx and RP grades, the risk of recurrence was intermediate, irrespective of whether the highest grade was at RP or SBx. For instance, the 5-yr bRFS rate was 57% for men with GG 3 on RP and 60% for men with GG 3 on SBx, but 63% for men with RP GG 3 and SBx GG 2, and 79% for men with RP GG 2 and SBx GG 3. Translating these findings to MRI-TBx casts doubt on current grading practice: when GGs are discordant between SBx and MRI-TBx, the risk of biochemical recurrence risk is not driven by the highest grade but by an intermediate between the two grades. Our findings should motivate studies assessing long-term outcomes for patients undergoing both MRI-TBx and SBx with a view to empirically evaluating current grading practices. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with prostate cancer may undergo two biopsy types: (1) systematic biopsy, for which sampling follows a systematic template; and (2) targeted biopsy, for which samples are taken from lesions detected on scans. There may be a difference in prostate cancer grade identified by the two approaches. In such cases, the risk of cancer recurrence seems to be predicted by an intermediate grade between the lower and higher grades.

摘要

前列腺活检的病理分级遵循的规则是,采用最高的国际泌尿病理学会分级组(GG)。该规则是在系统活检(SBx)时代制定的,在前列腺的不同区域取样时具有意义。该规则已适用于多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)靶向活检(MRI-TBx),因为后者从小区域中靶向和系统地采集多个样本。特别是,如果 SBx 和 MRI-TBx 的结果不一致,患者会被分配更高的 GG。然而,对于 MRI-TBx 和 SBx 分级不一致时最合适的分级方法,尚未经过实证研究。目前还没有接受 SBx 和 MRI-TBx 检查且具有长期肿瘤学随访的患者队列。为了估计每种活检和病理分级组合的复发风险,我们使用根治性前列腺切除术(RP)上的 GG 作为 MRI-TBx 上 GG 的替代物。我们分析了在一家三级转诊中心接受 SBx 和 RP 的 12468 名男性的数据,并评估了每种活检和手术 GG 结果的组合 5 年生化无复发生存率(bRFS)。我们发现,对于 SBx 和 RP 分级不一致的病例,无论 RP 还是 SBx 的最高分级如何,复发风险均为中等。例如,RP GG 3 的男性 5 年 bRFS 率为 57%,而 SBx GG 3 的男性为 60%,但 RP GG 3 和 SBx GG 2 的男性为 63%,而 RP GG 2 和 SBx GG 3 的男性为 79%。将这些发现转化为 MRI-TBx,对当前的分级实践提出了质疑:当 SBx 和 MRI-TBx 之间的 GG 不一致时,生化复发风险的大小并非由最高分级决定,而是由两个分级之间的中间分级决定。我们的发现应该促使人们开展研究,评估同时接受 MRI-TBx 和 SBx 治疗的患者的长期结局,以从经验上评估当前的分级实践。

患者总结

患有前列腺癌的患者可能接受两种活检类型:(1)系统活检,其采样遵循系统模板;(2)靶向活检,其样本取自扫描中检测到的病变。两种方法可能会识别出不同的前列腺癌分级。在这种情况下,癌症复发的风险似乎由较低和较高分级之间的中间分级来预测。