School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):1023. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10003-x.
The majority of cancer patients and cancer care clinicians-CCCs (e.g., oncologists) believe that exercise is an important adjunct therapy that should be embedded in standard practice. Yet, CCCs do not routinely discuss exercise with their patients, nor do they regularly refer them to exercise professionals (e.g., exercise physiologists-EPs). This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of an evidence-based approach to improving exercise communication between CCCs and their patients, including an exercise referral pathway.
Implementation and testing of the Exercise Communication and Referral Pathway (ECRP) occurred in Sydney, Australia. The ECRP included a brief oncology-initiated communication exchange with patients, CCC exercise referral to an EP, followed by EP-initiated telephone consultation with patients concerning tailored exercise advice. Participant perceptions concerning the feasibility and applicability of the ECPR were evaluated. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with CCCs (n = 3), cancer patients (n = 21), and an EP (n = 1). Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken.
Analysis generated three themes: (1) Navigating the role of CCCs in the ECRP, suggesting that oncology-initiated communication is a cue to action, however there was a lack of role clarity regarding exercise referral; (2) Implementing Patient-Orientated Care within a Standardised Pathway, highlighting the need for tailored information and advice for patients that reflects individual disease, socio-cultural, and environmental factors, and; (3) Taking Steps Towards Action, revealing the need for structural (e.g., EP initiated contact with patients) and policy changes (i.e., changes to Medicare, direct oncologist referral) to engage patients and better integrate exercise as part of standard care.
Findings provide important insights into improving oncology-patient exercise communication and developing an exercise referral pathway to increase engagement and patient reach. However, individual (e.g., experience, knowledge) and contextual factors (e.g., time, resources) need consideration when implementing an ECRP.
This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical (#ACTRN12620000358943) on March 13, 2020.
大多数癌症患者和癌症护理临床医生(例如肿瘤学家)认为,运动是一种重要的辅助疗法,应该纳入标准治疗。然而,临床医生并不经常与患者讨论运动,也不经常将他们转介给运动专业人士(例如运动生理学家)。本研究评估了一种基于证据的方法在改善临床医生与患者之间运动沟通方面的可行性和可接受性,包括运动转介途径。
在澳大利亚悉尼实施和测试了运动沟通和转介途径(ECRP)。ECRP 包括一个由肿瘤学发起的与患者的简短沟通交流,临床医生将患者转介给运动生理学家,然后由运动生理学家通过电话与患者进行个性化的运动咨询。评估了参与者对 ECRP 的可行性和适用性的看法。对临床医生(n=3)、癌症患者(n=21)和运动生理学家(n=1)进行了半结构化访谈。采用归纳主题分析。
分析生成了三个主题:(1)临床医生在 ECRP 中的角色定位,表明肿瘤学发起的沟通是采取行动的线索,但在运动转介方面缺乏角色明确性;(2)在标准化途径中实施以患者为中心的护理,强调需要为患者提供量身定制的信息和建议,反映个体疾病、社会文化和环境因素;(3)迈向行动,揭示了结构性(例如,运动生理学家主动与患者联系)和政策变革(即修改医疗保险,直接由肿瘤医生转介)的必要性,以吸引患者并更好地将运动纳入标准治疗。
研究结果为改善肿瘤学患者运动沟通和制定运动转介途径提供了重要见解,以提高参与度和患者覆盖率。然而,在实施 ECRP 时需要考虑个人因素(例如经验、知识)和环境因素(例如时间、资源)。
该试验于 2020 年 3 月 13 日在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12620000358943)进行了前瞻性注册。