Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan.
Nancy and James Grosfeld Cancer Genetics Center, William Beaumont University Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Oakland University, William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jan-Feb;14(1):e29-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
There are mixed and limited data regarding radiation therapy (RT) tolerance in carriers of a germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) ATM variant. We investigated RT-related toxic effects in carriers of an ATM variant who received treatment for breast cancer.
We identified 71 patients treated with adjuvant RT for breast cancer who were carriers of a variant in ATM: 15 were classified as P/LP and 56 classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS). We additionally identified 205 consecutively treated patients during a similar timeframe who were either confirmed ATM wild type or had no prior genetic testing. RT plans were reviewed. Acute and chronic toxic effects were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 criteria. Fisher's exact tests for count data were performed to compare toxic effects between the cohorts (P/LP vs VUS vs control). Wilcoxon rank-sum testing was performed to assess for differences in patient characteristics.
The median toxicity follow-up was 19.4 months; median follow-up for the subcohorts was 13.3 months (P/LP), 12.6 months (VUS), and 23.3 months (control). There were no significant differences in radiation plan heterogeneity, receipt of a boost, or size of breast/chest wall planning target volume. There was greater use of hypofractionated RT in the control cohort (P = .023). After accounting for patient- and treatment-related factors that may affect toxic effects, we found no significant differences with respect to acute dermatitis, hyperpigmentation, moist desquamation, breast/chest wall pain, or breast edema. Additionally, we found no significant differences with respect to chronic breast/chest wall pain, induration, telangiectasia, or cosmetic outcome.
RT as part of the management of breast cancer was well tolerated in carriers of a P/LP ATM variant, with toxic effect profiles that were similar to those seen in patients without known ATM mutations. High rates of excellent or good cosmesis were observed in carriers of a P/LP ATM variant who underwent breast conservation.
携带种系致病性或可能致病性(P/LP)ATM 变异体的患者,其放射治疗(RT)耐受情况存在混杂且有限的数据。我们研究了接受乳腺癌治疗的 ATM 变异携带者的 RT 相关毒性作用。
我们确定了 71 名接受辅助 RT 治疗乳腺癌的患者,他们携带 ATM 变异体:15 名被归类为 P/LP,56 名归类为意义不明的变异体(VUS)。我们还确定了在相似时间段内连续接受治疗的 205 名患者,他们要么是 ATM 野生型,要么没有进行过先前的基因检测。我们回顾了 RT 计划。使用通用不良事件术语标准 4.0 标准评估急性和慢性毒性作用。使用 Fisher 确切检验比较了队列之间的毒性作用(P/LP 与 VUS 与对照组)。使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验评估患者特征的差异。
中位毒性随访时间为 19.4 个月;亚组的中位随访时间分别为 13.3 个月(P/LP)、12.6 个月(VUS)和 23.3 个月(对照组)。辐射计划的异质性、接受增敏剂量照射或乳房/胸壁计划靶区的大小没有显著差异。对照组更倾向于采用低分割放疗(P=.023)。在考虑了可能影响毒性作用的患者和治疗相关因素后,我们发现急性皮炎、色素沉着、湿性脱皮、乳房/胸壁疼痛或乳房水肿方面没有显著差异。此外,我们发现慢性乳房/胸壁疼痛、硬结、毛细血管扩张或美容效果方面也没有显著差异。
作为乳腺癌治疗一部分的 RT 在携带 P/LP ATM 变异体的患者中耐受良好,其毒性作用谱与无已知 ATM 突变的患者相似。接受保乳治疗的 P/LP ATM 变异携带者,其良好或优秀的美容效果率很高。