Institute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Institute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Dec;118(6):1133-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.09.007. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
Both small-quantity and medium-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS) have been used for the prevention of child undernutrition. A meta-analysis of 14 trials of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS) - no LNS showed effects on length-for-age z-score {LAZ, +0.14 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11, 0.16]} and weight-for-length z-score [WLZ, +0.08 (0.06, 0.10)] z-scores, as well as prevalence ratios (95% CI) for stunting [LAZ < -2, 0.88 (0.85, 0.91)] and wasting [WLZ < -2, 0.86 (0.80, 0.93)]. However, little is known about the effects of medium-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (MQ-LNS) on growth.
We aimed to examine the effects of preventive MQ-LNS (∼250-499 kcal/d) provided at ∼6-23 mo of age on growth outcomes - no LNS or provision of SQ-LNS.
We conducted a systematic review of studies of MQ-LNS for prevention, and categorized them as providing <6 mo - ≥6 mo of supplementation; for the latter category, we conducted a meta-analysis, with the main outcomes being change in WLZ and LAZ, and prevalence of wasting and stunting.
Three studies provided MQ-LNS for 3-5 mo (seasonal) for children 6-36 mo of age, and did not show consistent effects on growth outcomes. Eight studies provided MQ-LNS for 6-18 mo, generally starting at 6 mo of age; in the meta-analysis (max total n = 13,954), MQ-LNS increased WLZ [+0.09 (95% CI: 0.05, 0.13)] and reduced wasting [0.89 (0.81, 0.97)], but had no effect on LAZ [+0.04 (-0.02, 0.11)] or stunting [0.97 (0.92, 1.02)] - no LNS. Two studies directly compared SQ-LNS and MQ-LNS and showed no significant differences in growth outcomes.
The current evidence suggests that MQ-LNS offer no added benefits over SQ-LNS, although further studies directly comparing MQ-LNS with SQ-LNS would be useful. One possible explanation is incomplete consumption of the MQ-LNS ration and thus lower than desirable intake of certain nutrients.
Registry and registry number for systematic reviews or meta-analyses: Registered with PROSPERO as CRD42022382448 on December 18, 2022: =https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022382448.
小剂量和中剂量的基于脂质的营养补充剂(LNS)都被用于预防儿童营养不良。对 14 项小剂量基于脂质的营养补充剂(SQ-LNS)试验的荟萃分析——无 LNS 显示对年龄别身长 Z 评分(LAZ,+0.14[95%置信区间(CI):0.11,0.16])和身长别体重 Z 评分(WLZ,+0.08[0.06,0.10])的影响,以及发育迟缓(LAZ<-2)和消瘦(WLZ<-2)的患病率比值(95%CI)[LAZ < -2,0.88(0.85,0.91)]和消瘦(WLZ < -2,0.86(0.80,0.93))。然而,对于中剂量基于脂质的营养补充剂(MQ-LNS)对生长的影响知之甚少。
我们旨在研究预防性 MQ-LNS(约 250-499 千卡/天)在 6-23 月龄时提供对生长结果的影响-无 LNS 或提供 SQ-LNS。
我们对 MQ-LNS 预防的研究进行了系统评价,并将其分为提供<6 个月-≥6 个月的补充;对于后者,我们进行了荟萃分析,主要结果是 WLZ 和 LAZ 的变化,以及消瘦和发育迟缓的患病率。
三项研究提供了 3-5 个月(季节性)的 MQ-LNS,用于 6-36 月龄的儿童,对生长结果没有一致的影响。八项研究提供了 6-18 个月的 MQ-LNS,通常从 6 个月开始;在荟萃分析(最大总 n=13954)中,MQ-LNS 增加了 WLZ[+0.09(95%CI:0.05,0.13)]和减少了消瘦[0.89(0.81,0.97)],但对 LAZ 没有影响[+0.04(-0.02,0.11)]或发育迟缓[0.97(0.92,1.02)]-无 LNS。两项研究直接比较了 SQ-LNS 和 MQ-LNS,发现生长结果没有显著差异。
目前的证据表明,MQ-LNS 与 SQ-LNS 相比没有额外的益处,尽管直接比较 MQ-LNS 与 SQ-LNS 的进一步研究将是有用的。一种可能的解释是 MQ-LNS 配给的不完全消耗,因此某些营养素的摄入量低于理想水平。
用于系统评价或荟萃分析的注册和注册号:于 2022 年 12 月 18 日在 PROSPERO 上注册为 CRD42022382448:=https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022382448。