Suppr超能文献

脊柱麻醉与全身麻醉(SAGA)在髋关节和膝关节置换术后恢复中的比较:三项随机、单盲、多中心临床试验研究方案。

Spinal anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia (SAGA) on recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty: A study protocol for three randomized, single-blinded, multi-centre, clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedic Surgery Hvidovre (CORH), Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jan;68(1):137-143. doi: 10.1111/aas.14331. Epub 2023 Sep 24.

Abstract

Mobilisation difficulties, due to muscle weakness, and urinary retention are common reasons for prolonged admission following hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. Whether spinal anaesthesia is detrimental to early mobilisation is controversial. Previous studies have reported differences in post-operative recovery between spinal anaesthesia and general anaesthesia; however, up-to-date comparisons in fast-track setups are needed. Our randomized, single-blinded, multi-centre, clinical trials aim to compare the post-operative recovery after total hip (THA), total knee (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) respectively when using either spinal anaesthesia (SA) or general anaesthesia (GA) in a fast-track setup. Included patients (74 THA, 74 TKA, and 74 UKA patients) are randomized (1:1) to receive either SA (2 mL 0.5% Bupivacaine) or GA (Induction: Propofol 1.0-2.0 mg/kg iv with Remifentanil 3-5 mcg/kg iv. Infusion: Propofol 3-5 mg/kg/h and Remifentanil 0.5 mcg/kg/min iv). Patients undergo standard primary unilateral hip and knee arthroplasty procedures in an optimized fast-track setup with intraoperative local infiltrative analgesia in TKA and UKA, post-operative multimodal opioid sparing analgesia, immediate mobilisation with full weightbearing, no drains and in-hospital only thromboprophylaxis. Data will be collected on the day of surgery and until patients are discharged. The primary outcome is the ability to be safely mobilised during a 5-m walking test within 6 h of surgery. Secondary outcomes include fulfilment of discharge criteria, post-operative pain, dizziness, and nausea as well as patient reported recovery and opioid related side effects. Data will also be gathered on all hospital contacts within 30-days of surgery. This study will offer insights into advantages and disadvantages of anaesthetic methods used in fast-track arthroplasty surgery.

摘要

术后活动困难,由于肌肉无力和尿潴留,是髋关节和膝关节置换术后住院时间延长的常见原因。椎管内麻醉是否不利于早期活动存在争议。先前的研究报告了椎管内麻醉和全身麻醉之间术后恢复的差异;然而,需要对快速通道设置中的最新比较。我们的随机、单盲、多中心临床试验旨在比较分别在快速通道设置下使用椎管内麻醉(SA)或全身麻醉(GA)时,全髋关节置换术(THA)、全膝关节置换术(TKA)和单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)后的术后恢复情况。纳入的患者(74 例 THA、74 例 TKA 和 74 例 UKA 患者)按 1:1 随机分为 SA(2ml0.5%布比卡因)或 GA(诱导:丙泊酚 1.0-2.0mg/kg 静脉注射,瑞芬太尼 3-5mcg/kg 静脉注射。输注:丙泊酚 3-5mg/kg/h,瑞芬太尼 0.5mcg/kg/min 静脉注射)。患者在优化的快速通道设置下接受标准单侧初次髋关节和膝关节置换术,在 TKA 和 UKA 中进行术中局部浸润性镇痛,术后多模式阿片类药物节约镇痛,立即活动,完全负重,不引流,仅在医院进行血栓预防。数据将在手术当天和患者出院前收集。主要结局是在手术 6 小时内安全地进行 5 米步行测试的能力。次要结局包括满足出院标准、术后疼痛、头晕和恶心以及患者报告的恢复和阿片类药物相关副作用。还将收集手术 30 天内所有医院接触的相关数据。这项研究将提供关于快速通道关节置换手术中使用的麻醉方法的优缺点的见解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验