Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/RaymondVerm.
Department of Surgery, Edward Hines VA Medical Center, Hines, IL.
Surgery. 2024 Mar;175(3):618-628. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.07.026. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
Increasing regionalization for esophagectomy for cancer may lead patients to travel for surgery at one institution and receive chemotherapy at another closer to home. We explore the effects on survival for care fragmentation, the Commission on Cancer status of secondary institutions providing chemotherapy, and the type of institution performing surgery.
We queried the National Cancer Database to identify all patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer and received perioperative chemotherapy between 2006 and 2019. Patients were divided into single-center care, fragmented-to-Commission on Cancer care, or fragmented-to-non-Commission on Cancer care. We identified associations using multivariable logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, and Cox proportional hazards models.
A total of 18,502 patients met the criteria for inclusion: 8,290 (44.8%) received single-center care; 3,414 (18.5%) fragmented-to-Commission on Cancer care; and 6,798 (36.4%) fragmented-to-non-Commission on Cancer care. Fragmented care was more likely in White patients (adjusted odds ratio = 1.25; P < .001) and in patients nonadjacent to a metropolitan area (adjusted odds ratio = 1.36; P < .001). Overall survival was equivalent between single-center and fragmented care, but undergoing an esophagectomy at an academic center was associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.82; P = .016). In patients with an esophagectomy at a nonacademic center, overall survival was best if perioperative chemotherapy was administered at Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities compared with chemotherapy at fragmented-to-non-Commission on Cancer centers (P = .022).
Most of the esophageal cancer care in the US is fragmented at multiple institutions. When care is fragmented, it is most commonly at non-Commission on Cancer centers for perioperative chemotherapy. Overall survival is best when esophagectomy is performed at an academic center, and perioperative therapy is administered at Commission on Cancer-accredited facilities.
癌症食管癌切除术的区域化程度不断提高,可能导致患者前往一家机构进行手术,而在离家较近的另一家机构接受化疗。我们探讨了治疗碎片化、提供化疗的二级机构的癌症委员会地位以及进行手术的机构类型对生存的影响。
我们查询了国家癌症数据库,以确定所有在 2006 年至 2019 年间接受食管癌切除术并接受围手术期化疗的食管癌患者。患者分为单中心治疗、碎片化至癌症委员会治疗或碎片化至非癌症委员会治疗。我们使用多变量逻辑回归、Kaplan-Meier 生存分析和 Cox 比例风险模型来确定关联。
共有 18502 名患者符合纳入标准:8290 名(44.8%)接受单中心治疗;3414 名(18.5%)碎片化至癌症委员会治疗;6798 名(36.4%)碎片化至非癌症委员会治疗。白人患者(调整优势比=1.25;P<.001)和非大都市地区患者(调整优势比=1.36;P<.001)更有可能接受碎片化治疗。单中心治疗和碎片化治疗的总体生存率相当,但在学术中心接受食管癌切除术与改善生存率相关(调整风险比=0.82;P=.016)。在非学术中心接受食管癌切除术的患者中,如果围手术期化疗在癌症委员会认可的机构进行,而不是在碎片化至非癌症委员会中心进行,总体生存率最佳(P=.022)。
美国大部分食管癌治疗都是在多个机构进行碎片化治疗。当治疗碎片化时,最常见的是在非癌症委员会中心进行围手术期化疗。当在学术中心进行食管癌切除术且围手术期治疗在癌症委员会认可的机构进行时,总体生存率最佳。